Vernon ST, Coffey S, Bhindi R, et al. Increasing proportion of ST elevation myocardial infarction patients with coronary atherosclerosis poorly explained by standard modifiable risk factors. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2017: 24: 1824–1830.
2.
RainesJK. Electromagnetic field interactions with the human body: Observed effects and theories, Greenbelt, MD, USA: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, 1981.
3.
Bandara P and Johannson O. Letter to the Editor. Radiat Protect Dosimetry. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncx108 (accessed 20 September 2017).
4.
HardellL. World Health Organization, radiofrequency radiation and health – a hard nut to crack (Review). Int J Oncol2017; 51: 405–413.
5.
RuedigerHW. Genotoxic effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Pathophysiology2009; 16: 89–102.
American Academy of Environmental Medicine. Electromagnetic and Radiofrequency Fields Effect on Human Health. https://www.aaemonline.org/emf_rf_position.php (accessed 20 September 2017).
BaanRGrosseYLauby-SecretanBet al.Carcinogenicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Lancet Oncol2011; 12: 624–626.
11.
BortkiewiczAGadzickaESzymczakW. Mobile phone use and risk for intracranial tumors and salivary gland tumors – a meta-analysis. Int J Occup Med Environ Health2017; 30: 27–43.
12.
CoureauGBouvierGLebaillyPet al.Mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case–control study. Occup Environ Med2014; 71: 514–522.
13.
LerchlAKloseMGroteKet al.Tumor promotion by exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields below exposure limits for humans. Biochem Biophys Res Commun2015; 459: 585–590.
14.
CarlbergMHardellL. Evaluation of mobile phone and cordless phone use and glioma risk using the Bradford Hill viewpoints from 1965 on association or causation. BioMed Res Int2017; 2017: 9218486–9218486.
15.
StarkeySJ. Inaccurate official assessment of radiofrequency safety by the Advisory Group on Non-ionising Radiation. Rev Environ Health2016; 31: 493–503.
YakymenkoITsybulinOSidorikEet al.Oxidative mechanisms of biological activity of low-intensity radiofrequency radiation. Electromag Biol Med2016; 35: 1–17.
18.
BandaraPWellerS. Biological effects of low-intensity radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation – time for a paradigm shift in regulation of public exposure. J Australas Radiat Prot Soc2017; 34: in press.
19.
Abu KhadraKMKhalilAMAbu SamakMet al.Evaluation of selected biochemical parameters in the saliva of young males using mobile phones. Electromag Biol Med2015; 34: 72–76.
20.
HamzanyYFeinmesserRShpitzerTet al.Is human saliva an indicator of the adverse health effects of using mobile phones?Antioxid Redox Signal2013; 18: 622–627.
21.
ZothansiamaZosangzualiMLalramdinpuiiMet al.Impact of radiofrequency radiation on DNA damage and antioxidants in peripheral blood lymphocytes of humans residing in the vicinity of mobile phone base stations. Electromag Biol Med2017; 36: 1–11.
22.
BarnesFGreenenbaumB. Some effects of weak magnetic fields on biological systems: RF fields can change radical concentrations and cancer cell growth rates. IEEE Power Electronics Mag2016; 3: 60–68.
23.
VassalleCBianchiSBattagliaDet al.Elevated levels of oxidative stress as a prognostic predictor of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with coronary artery disease. J Atheroscler Thromb2012; 19: 712–717.
24.
LuscherTF. Ageing, inflammation, and oxidative stress: final common pathways of cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J2015; 36: 3381–3383.
25.
BrauneSWrocklageCRaczekJet al.Resting blood pressure increase during exposure to a radio-frequency electromagnetic field. Lancet1998; 351: 1857–1858.
26.
VangelovaKDeyanovCIsraelM. Cardiovascular risk in operators under radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Hyg Environ Health2006; 209: 133–138.
27.
SzmigielskiSBortkiewiczAGadzickaEet al.Alteration of diurnal rhythms of blood pressure and heart rate to workers exposed to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields. Blood Press Monit1998; 3: 323–330.
28.
CookHJSteneckNHVanderAJet al.Early research on the biological effects of microwave radiation: 1940–1960. Ann Sci1980; 37: 323–351.
29.
Army Medical Intelligence and Information Agency. Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Radiation (Radiowaves and Microwaves) – Eurasian Communist Countries. Office of the Surgeon General, United States of America, 1976.
30.
BolenSM. Radiofrequency/microwave radiation biological effects and Safety standards: A review, Griffiss Air Force Base, New York: United States Air Force Materiel Command, 1994.
31.
PuskaPVartiainenENissinenAet al.Background, principles, implementation, and general experiences of the North Karelia Project. Glob Heart2016; 11: 173–178.
32.
VangelovaKKIsraelMS. Variations of melatonin and stress hormones under extended shifts and radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Rev Environ Health2005; 20: 151–161.
33.
BortkiewiczAGadzickaESzymczakWet al.Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis in radio and TV broadcasting stations workers. Int J Occup Med Environ Health2012; 25: 446–455.
34.
HavasMMarrongelleJ. Replication of heart rate variability provocation study with 2.4-GHz cordless phone confirms original findings. Electromag Biol Med2013; 32: 253–266.
35.
Andrzejak R, Poreba R, Poreba M, et al. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Ind Health 2008; 46: 409–417.
36.
PallML. Electromagnetic fields act via activation of voltage-gated calcium channels to produce beneficial or adverse effects. J Cell Mol Med2013; 17: 958–965.
37.
PallML. The NO/ONOO-cycle as the central cause of heart failure. Int J M Sci2013; 14: 22274–22330.
HussAEggerMHugKet al.Source of funding and results of studies of health effects of mobile phone use: systematic review of experimental studies. Environ Health Perspect2007; 115: 1–4.
43.
PiepoliMFHoesAWAgewallSet al.2016 European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: the Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts): developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation (EACPR). Eur J Prev Cardiol2016; 23: NP1–NP96.