High intensity interval training in coronary artery disease patients,is it worth the effort?

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Townsend

Nichols

Scarborough

et al.

Cardiovascular disease in Europe – epidemiological update 2015. Eur Heart J 2015; 36: 2696–2705.

GBD 2013 Mortality and Causes of Death Collaborators. Global, regional and national age–sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 385: 117–171.

Anderson

Oldridge

Thompson

et al.

Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016; 67: 1–12.

Kraal JJ, Vromen T, Spee R, et al. The influence of training characteristics on the effect of exercise training in patients with coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Int J Cardiol. Epub ahead of print 15 October 2017.

Piepoli

Corrà

Benzer

et al.

Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the cardiac rehabilitation section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2010; 17: 1–17.

Vanhees

Stevens

Schepers

et al.

Determinants of the effects of physical training and of the complications requiring resuscitation during exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004; 11: 304–312.

Fletcher

Balady

Froelicher

et al.

Exercise standards. A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation 1995; 91: 580–615.

Rognmo

Hetland

Helgerud

et al.

High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2004; 11: 216–222.

Wisloff

Stoylen

Loennechen

et al.

Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation 2007; 115: 3086–3094.

10.

Pattyn

Coeckelberghs

Buys

et al.

Aerobic interval training vs moderate continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 2014; 44: 687–700.

11.

Elliot

Rajopadhyaya

Bentley

et al.

Interval training versus continuous exercise in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Heart Lung Circ 2015; 24: 149–157.

12.

Liou

Fildes

et al.

High intensity interval versus moderate intensity continuous training in patients with coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of physiological and clinical parameters. Heart Lung Circ 2016; 25: 166–174.

13.

Xie

Yan

Cai

et al.

Effects of high-intensity training on aerobic capacity in cardiac patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2017; 2017: 5420840–5420840.

14.

Conraads

Pattyn

De Maeyer

et al.

Aerobic interval training and continuous training equally improve aerobic exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study. Int J Cardiol 2015; 179: 203–210.

15.

Gomes-Neto M, Duraes AR, Reis HFCD, et al. High-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on exercise capacity and quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 24: 1696–1707.

16.

Reichert

Baros

Domingues

et al.

The role of perceived personal barriers to engagement in leisure-time physical activity. Am J Public Health 2007; 97: 515–519.

17.

Wewege

van den Berg

Ward

et al.

The effects of high-intensity interval training vs. moderate-intensity continuous training on body composition in overweight and obese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 635–646.

18.

Keating

Johnson

Mielke

et al.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on body adiposity. Obes Rev 2017; 18: 943–964.

19.

Pattyn

Cornelissen

Buys

et al.

Are aerobic interval training and continuous training isocaloric in coronary artery disease patients?

Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1486–1495.

20.

Conraads

Van Craenenbroeck

Pattyn

et al.

Rationale and design of a randomized trial on the effectiveness of aerobic interval training in patients with coronary artery disease: the SAINTEX-CAD study. Int J Cardiol 2013; 168: 3532–3536.

21.

Ellingsen

Halle

Conraads

et al.

High-intensity interval training in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Circulation 2017; 135: 839–849.

22.

Aamot

Forbord

Gustad

et al.

Home-based versus hospital-based high-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 1070–1078.

23.

Zenko

Ekkekakis

Ariely

. Can you have your vigorous exercise and enjoy it too? Ramping intensity down increases postexercise, remembered, and forecasted pleasure. J Sport Exerc Psychol 2016; 38: 149–159.

24.

Pattyn

Vanhees

Cornelissen

et al.

The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: 1-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1154–1164.

25.

Mittleman

Maclure

Tofler

et al.

Triggering of acute myocardial infarction by heavy physical exertion. Protection against triggering by regular exertion. Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 1677–1683.

26.

Siscovick

Weiss

Fletcher

et al.

The incidence of primary cardiac arrest during vigorous exercise. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 874–877.

27.

Levinger

Shaw

Stepto

et al.

What doesn’t kill you makes you fitter: a systematic review of high-intensity interval exercise for patients with cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Clin Med Insights Cardiol 2015; 9: 53–63.

28.

Rognmo

Moholdt

Bakken

et al.

Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation 2012; 126: 1436–1440.

29.

Guazzi

Adams

Conraads

et al.

EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement, clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Circulation 2012; 126: 2261–2274.