Psychometric properties of HeartQoL,a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire,in Danish implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

Abstract

Background

Patient-reported health-related quality of life is increasingly used as an outcome measure in clinical trials and as a performance measure to evaluate quality of care. The objective of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Danish HeartQoL questionnaire, a core heart disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire, in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

Design

This study involved cross-sectional and test-retest study designs.

Method

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients in the cross-sectional study completed the HeartQoL, the Short-Form 36 Health Survey, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. The HeartQoL structure, construct-related validity (convergent and discriminative) and reliability (internal consistency) were assessed. HeartQoL reproducibility (test-retest) was assessed in an independent sample of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

Results

Mokken scale analysis supported the bi-dimensional structure of HeartQoL among 358 implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients. Convergent (r > 0.72) and discriminative validity were confirmed. The HeartQoL scales demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha > 0.90). Test-retest reliability (two weeks interval) was assessed in 89 implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients and found to be acceptable for each scale (intra-class correlation > 0.90).

Conclusion

The Danish HeartQoL questionnaire demonstrated satisfactory key psychometric attributes of validity and reliability in this implantable cardioverter defibrillator population. This study adds support for the HeartQoL as a core heart-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire in a broad group of patients with heart disease including implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients.

Keywords

Implantable defibrillators psychometrics quality of life surveys and questionnaires

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Rumsfeld

Alexander

Goff

et al.

Cardiovascular health: The importance of measuring patient-reported health status a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013; 127: 2233–2249.

Anker

Agewall

Borggrefe

et al.

The importance of patient-reported outcomes: A call for their comprehensive integration in cardiovascular clinical trials. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 2001–2009.

Zipes

Camm

Borggrefe

et al.

ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: e247–e346.

Dunbar

Dougherty

Sears

et al.

Educational and psychological interventions to improve outcomes for recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and their families: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2012; 126: 2146–2172.

Oldridge

Höfer

McGee

et al.

The HeartQoL: Part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2014; 21: 98–106.

De Smedt

Clays

Höfer

et al.

Validity and reliability of the HeartQoL questionnaire in a large sample of stable coronary patients: The EUROASPIRE IV study of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 714–721.

Kristensen

Zwisler

A-D

Berg

et al.

Validating the HeartQoL questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2016; 23: 1496–1503.

Kikkenborg Berg

Caspar Thygesen

Hastrup Svendsen

et al.

Anxiety predicts mortality in ICD patients: Results from the Cross-Sectional National CopenHeartICD Survey with register follow-up. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2014; 37: 1641–1650.

Lynge

Sandegaard

Rebolj

. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011; 39: 30–33.

10.

Charlson

Pompei

Ales

et al.

A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 373–383.

11.

Streiner

Norman

Cairney

. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use, Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.

12.

Ware

Jr . SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000; 25: 3130–3139.

13.

Zigmond

. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.

14.

de Vet

HCW

. Measurement in medicine: A practical guide, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.

15.

Mokkink

Terwee

Patrick

et al.

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63: 737–745.

16.

Meijer

Baneke

. Analyzing psychopathology items: A case for nonparametric item response theory modeling. Psychol Methods 2004; 9: 354–368.

17.

Steiger

. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychol Bull 1980; 87: 245–251.

18.

Bland

Altman

. Statistics notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ 1997; 314: 572–572.

19.

Weir

. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 231–240.

20.

Aaronson

Alonso

Burnam

et al.

Assessing health status and quality-of-life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 2002; 11: 193–205.

21.

Polit

. Getting serious about test–retest reliability: A critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res 2014; 23: 1713–1720.

22.

Pedersen

Theuns

Erdman

et al.

Clustering of device-related concerns and type D personality predicts increased distress in ICD patients independent of shocks. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2007; 31: 20–27.

23.

Lee

Chinna

Bulgiba

et al.

Test–retest reliability of HeartQoL and its comparability to the MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire. Qual Life Res 2016; 25(2): 351–351.