Cardiac rehabilitation is an important component in the continuum of care for individuals with cardiovascular disease, providing a multidisciplinary education and exercise programme to improve morbidity and mortality risk. Internationally, cardiac rehabilitation programmes are implemented through various models. This review compared cardiac rehabilitation guidelines in order to identify any differences and/or consensus in exercise testing, prescription and monitoring.
Methods
Guidelines, position statements and policy documents for cardiac rehabilitation, available internationally in the English language, were identified through a search of electronic databases and government and cardiology society websites. Information about programme delivery, exercise testing, prescription and monitoring were extracted and compared.
Results
Leading cardiac rehabilitation societies in North America and Europe recommend that patients progress from moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic endurance exercise over the course of the programme, with resistance training included as an important adjunct, for maintaining independence and quality of life. North American and European guidelines also recommend electrocardiograph-monitored exercise stress tests. Guidelines for South America and individual European nations typically include similar recommendations; however, those in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand specify lower-intensity exercise and less technical assessment of functional capacity.
Conclusion
Higher-intensity aerobic training programmes, supplemented by resistance training, have been recommended and deemed safe for cardiac rehabilitation patients by many authorities. Based on research evidence, this may also provide superior outcomes for patients and should therefore be considered when developing an international consensus for exercise prescription in cardiac rehabilitation.
Bjarnason-WehrensBMcGeeHZwislerAD. Cardiac rehabilitation in Europe: Results from the European Cardiac Rehabilitation Inventory Survey. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17: 410–418.
4.
World Health Organization Expert Committee. Rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with special emphasis on developing countries. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser1993; 831: 1–122.
5.
McCreery C, Cradock K, Fallon N, et al. Cardiac Rehabilitation Guidelines 2013. Dublin: Irish Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Available at: http://www.iacr.info/about/guidelines/ (2013, accessed 24 March 2015).
OldridgeN. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: Meta-analysis outcomes revisited. Future Cardiol2012; 8: 729–751.
8.
Turk-AdawiKSarrafzadeganNGraceSL. Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation. Nat Rev Cardiol2014; 11: 586–596.
9.
HuangKLiuWHeD. Telehealth interventions versus center-based cardiac rehabilitation of coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015; 22: 959–971.
10.
AndersonLOldridgeNThompsonDR. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol2016; 67: 1–12.
11.
ClarkRAConwayAPoulsenV. Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: A systematic review. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015; 22: 35–74.
12.
LawlerPRFilionKBEisenbergMJ. Efficacy of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation post-myocardial infarction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am Heart J2011; 162: 571–584.
13.
RosenbaumANKremersWKSchirgerJA. Association between early cardiac rehabilitation and long-term survival in cardiac transplant recipients. Mayo Clin Proc2016; 91: 149–156.
14.
GoelKPackQRLahrB. Cardiac rehabilitation is associated with reduced long-term mortality in patients undergoing combined heart valve and CABG surgery. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015; 22: 159–168.
15.
LewinterCDohertyPGaleCP. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with heart failure: A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials between 1999 and 2013. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015; 22: 1504–1512.
16.
Anchique SantosCVLopez-JimenezFBenaimB. Cardiac rehabilitation in Latin America. Prog Cardiovasc Dis2014; 57: 268–275.
BaladyGJWilliamsMAAdesPA. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation2007; 115: 2675–2682.
19.
American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs, 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 2013.
20.
StoneJAArthurHMSuskinN. Canadian Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Translating Knowledge into Action, 3rd ed. Winnipeg, Canada: Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation, 2009.
21.
PiepoliMFCorraUBenzerW. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: From knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17: 1–17.
WoodruffeSNeubeckLClarkRA. Australian Cardiovascular Health and Rehabilitation Association (ACRA) core components of cardiovascular disease secondary prevention and cardiac rehabilitation 2014. Heart Lung Circ2015; 24: 430–441.
PiepoliMFCorraUBenzerW. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: Physical activity counselling and exercise training: Key components of the position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur Heart J Suppl2010; 31: 1967–1974.
28.
PavyBIliouMCVerges-PatoisB. French Society of Cardiology guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation in adults. Arch Cardiovasc Dis2012; 105: 309–328.
29.
Japanese Circulation Society Joint Working Group. Guidelines for rehabilitation in patients with cardiovascular disease (JCS 2012). Circ J2014; 78: 2022–2093.
Bjarnason-WehrensBMayer-BergerWMeisterER. Recommendations for resistance exercise in cardiac rehabilitation. Recommendations of the German Federation for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2004; 11: 352–361.
Royal Dutch Society for Physical Therapy. KNGF clinical practice guideline for physical therapy in patients undergoing cardiac rehabilitation. Dutch J Phys Ther2011; 121: 1–47.
35.
British Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. The BACPR Standards and Core Components for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Rehabilitation 2012. 2nd ed. London: British Cardiovascular Society. Available at: http://www.bacpr.com/resources/46C_BACPR_Standards_and_Core_Components_2012.pdf (2012, accessed 8 April 2015).
BorgG. Borg’s Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales, Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.
38.
DendalePDereppeHSutterJD. Position paper of the Belgian Working Group on Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation: Cardiovascular rehabilitation. Acta Cardiol2008; 63: 673–681.
39.
Probert H, Barritt H, Breen S, et al. Standards for Physical Activity and Exercise in the Cardiovascular Population. 3rd ed. Manchester: Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Cardiac Rehabilitation. Available at: http://acpicr.com/sites/default/files/ACPICR%20Standards%202015.pdf (2015, accessed 7 March 2015).
AchttienRJStaalJBvan der VoortS. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: A practice guideline. Neth Heart J2013; 21: 429–438.
PinaILApsteinCSBaladyGJ. Exercise and heart failure: A statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention. Circulation2003; 107: 1210–1225.
44.
PiepoliMFConraadsVCorraU. Exercise training in heart failure: from theory to practice. A consensus document of the Heart Failure Association and the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Heart Fail2011; 13: 347–357.
45.
MoeGWEzekowitzJAO’MearaE. The 2013 Canadian Cardiovascular Society heart failure management guidelines update: Focus on rehabilitation and exercise and surgical coronary revascularization. Can J Cardiol2014; 30: 249–263.
46.
SeligSELevingerIWilliamsAD. Exercise & Sports Science Australia Position Statement on exercise training and chronic heart failure. J Sci Med Sport2010; 13: 288–294.
47.
ObermanAFletcherGFLeeJ. Efficacy of high-intensity exercise training on left ventricular ejection fraction in men with coronary artery disease (The Training Level Comparison Study). Am J Cardiol1995; 76: 643–647.
48.
GobleAJHareDLMacdonaldPS. Effect of early programmes of high and low intensity exercise on physical performance after transmural acute myocardial infarction. Br Heart J1991; 65: 126–131.
49.
WorcesterMCHareDLOliverRG. Early programmes of high and low intensity exercise and quality of life after acute myocardial infarction. BMJ1993; 307: 1244–1247.
50.
RechnitzerPACunninghamDAAndrewGM. Relation of exercise to the recurrence rate of myocardial infarction in men: Ontario Exercise-Heart Collaborative Study. Am J Cardiol1983; 51: 65–69.
51.
BlumenthalJARejeskiWJWalsh-RiddleM. Comparison of high- and low-intensity exercise training early after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol1986; 61: 26–30.
52.
MezzaniAHammLFJonesAM. Aerobic exercise intensity assessment and prescription in cardiac rehabilitation: A joint position statement of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation, the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation. Eur J Prev Cardiol2013; 20: 442–467.
53.
SandercockGRCardosoFAlmodhyM. Cardiorespiratory fitness changes in patients receiving comprehensive outpatient cardiac rehabilitation in the UK: A multicentre study. Heart2013; 99: 785–790.
54.
WestRRJonesDAHendersonAH. Rehabilitation after myocardial infarction trial (RAMIT): Multi-centre randomised controlled trial of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in patients following acute myocardial infarction. Heart2012; 98: 637–644.
55.
Pattyn N, Vanhees L, Cornelissen VA, et al. The long-term effects of a randomized trial comparing aerobic interval versus continuous training in coronary artery disease patients: 1-year data from the SAINTEX-CAD study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016; 23: 1154–1164.
56.
BelardinelliRPaoliniICianciG. Exercise training intervention after coronary angioplasty: The ETICA trial. J Am Coll Cardiol2001; 37: 1891–1900.
57.
GiallauriaFCirilloPLucciR. Left ventricular remodelling in patients with moderate systolic dysfunction after myocardial infarction: Favourable effects of exercise training and predictive role of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2008; 15: 113–118.
58.
La RovereMTBersanoCGnemmiM. Exercise-induced increase in baroreflex sensitivity predicts improved prognosis after myocardial infarction. Circulation2002; 106: 945–949.
59.
IellamoFLegramanteJMMassaroM. Effects of a residential exercise training on baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability in patients with coronary artery disease: A randomized controlled study. Circulation2000; 102: 2588–2592.
60.
HambrechtRWaltherCMobius-WinklerS. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty compared with exercise training in patients with stable coronary artery disease: A randomized trial. Circulation2004; 109: 1371–1378.
61.
ArthurHMSmithKMKodisJ. A controlled trial of hospital versus home-based exercise in cardiac patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc2002; 34: 1544–1550.
62.
KalapuraTLavieCJJaffraniW. Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training on indexes of dispersion of ventricular repolarization in patients after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol2003; 92: 292–294.
63.
AdesPAPashkowFJFletcherG. A controlled trial of cardiac rehabilitation in the home setting using electrocardiographic and voice transtelephonic monitoring. Am Heart J2000; 139: 543–548.
64.
GordonNFEnglishCDContractorAS. Effectiveness of three models for comprehensive cardiovascular disease risk reduction. Am J Cardiol2002; 89: 1263–1268.
65.
CarlsonJJJohnsonJAFranklinBA. Program participation, exercise adherence, cardiovascular outcomes and program cost of traditional versus modified cardiac rehabilitation. Am J Cardiol2000; 86: 17–23.
66.
OerkildBFrederiksenMHansenJF. Home-based cardiac rehabilitation is an attractive alternative to no cardiac rehabilitation for elderly patients with coronary heart disease: results from a randomised clinical trial. BMJ Open2012; 2: e001820–e001820.
67.
KovoorPLeeAKYCarrozziF. Return to full normal activities including work at two wks after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol2006; 97: 952–958.
68.
MaddisonRPfaeffliLWhittakerR. A mobile phone intervention increases physical activity in people with cardiovascular disease: Results from the HEART randomized controlled trial. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015; 22: 701–709.
69.
SandströmLStåhleA. Rehabilitation of elderly with coronary heart disease – Improvement in quality of life at a low cost. Adv Physiother2009; 7: 60–66.
70.
WilliamsMAHaskellWLAdesPA. Resistance exercise in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease: 2007 update: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism. Circulation2007; 116: 572–584.
71.
MarzoliniSOhPIBrooksD. Effect of combined aerobic and resistance training versus aerobic training alone in individuals with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol2012; 19: 81–94.
72.
FletcherGFAdesPAKligfieldP. Exercise standards for testing and training: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation2013; 128: 873–934.
73.
ArenaRMyersJWilliamsMA. Assessment of functional capacity in clinical and research settings: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Circulation2007; 116: 329–343.
74.
HarrisonSLGreeningNJHouchen-WolloffL. Age-specific normal values for the incremental shuttle walk test in a healthy British population. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev2013; 33: 309–313.
75.
ElliottDDenehyLBerneyS. Assessing physical function and activity for survivors of a critical illness: a review of instruments. Aust Crit Care2011; 24: 155–166.
76.
PavyBIliouMCMeurinP. Safety of exercise training for cardiac patients. Results of the French registry of complications during cardiac rehabilitation. Arch Intern Med2006; 166: 2329–2334.
77.
RogersMAYamamotoCHagbergJM. The effect of 7 years of intense exercise training on patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol1987; 10: 321–326.
78.
BelardinelliRGeorgiouDCianciG. 10-year exercise training in chronic heart failure: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol2012; 60: 1521–1528.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
