Abstract
Background
Guidelines recommend exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) for patients with heart failure (HF). However, established research has not investigated the longer-term outcomes including mortality and hospitalisation in light of the contemporary management of HF.
Methods
This was a systematic review including a meta-analysis of EBCR on all-cause mortality, hospital admission, and standardised exercise capacity using four separate exercise tests in patients with heart failure over a minimum follow-up of six months from January 1999–January 2013. Electronic searches were performed in the databases: Medline, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO constrained to randomised controlled trials (RCTs).
Results
A total of 46 separate RCTs qualified for the meta-analysis, which employed conventional methods for binary and continuous data. The relative risk (RR) ratio for hospital admission (12 studies) was significantly reduced (RR ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.84; p = 0.001), but mortality (21 studies) was not (RR ratio 0.88; 95% CI 0.77–1.02; p = 0.08). The standardised exercise capacity (26 studies) showed a standardised mean difference (SMD) in favour of the exercise group as compared with the controls (SMD 0.98, 95% CI 0.59–1.37; p < 0.001). Women and elderly people were less frequently enrolled in the RCTs independent of the outcomes. Heterogeneity was moderate to high in the analysis of hospital admission and the standardised exercise capacity demonstrated through skewedness in their funnel plots.
Conclusions
EBCR in patients with HF is associated with significant improvements in exercise capacity and hospital admission over a minimum of six months follow-up, but not in all-cause mortality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
