As lifestyle adherence and risk factor management following completion of cardiac rehabilitation (CR) have been shown to be problematic, we developed a brief self-regulation lifestyle programme for post-CR patients.
Design:
Randomized-controlled trial.
Methods:
Following completion of CR 210 patients were randomized to receive either a lifestyle maintenance programme (n = 112) or standard care (n = 98). The programme was based on self-regulation principles and consisted of a motivational interview, seven group sessions, and home assignments. Risk factors and health behaviours were assessed at baseline (end of CR) and 6 months thereafter.
Results:
ANCOVAs showed a significant effect of the lifestyle programme after 6 months on blood pressure, waist circumference, and exercise behaviour.
Conclusion:
This trial indicates that a relatively brief intervention based on self-regulation theory is capable of instigating and maintaining beneficial changes in lifestyle and risk factors after CR.
DusseldorpEMeulmanJKraaijV. A meta-analysis of psychoeduational programs for coronary heart disease patients. Health Psychol1999; 18(5): 506–519.
2.
ClarkAMHardingLVandermeerB. Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease. Ann Intern Med2005; 143(9): 659–672.
3.
KotsevaKWoodDDe BackerG. Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries. Lancet2009; 373(9667): 929–940.
4.
EUROASPIRE I and II Group; European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Clinical reality of coronary prevention guidelines: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I and II in nine countries. EUROASPIRE I and II Group. European Action on Secondary Prevention by Intervention to Reduce Events. Lancet2001; 357(9261): 995–1001.
5.
EUROASPIRE II Study Group. Lifestyle and risk factor management and use of drug therapies in coronary patients from 15 countries; principal results from EUROASPIRE II Euro Heart Survey Programme. Eur Heart J2001; 22(7): 554–572.
6.
KotsevaKWoodDADe BacquerD. Cardiac rehabilitation for coronary patients: lifestyle, risk factor and therapeutic management. Results from the EUROASPIRE II survey. Eur Heart J Suppl2004; 6(J): J17–J26.
7.
MittagO. Outcomes of cardiac rehabilitation with versus without a follow-up intervention rendered by telephone (Luebeck follow-up trial): overall and gender-specific effects. Int J Rehabil Res2006; 29(4): 295–301.
8.
ChaseJ-AD. Systematic review of physical activity intervention studies after cardiac rehabilitation. J Cardiovasc Nurs2011; 26(5): 351–358.
9.
BrubakerPHRejeskiWJSmithMJ. A home-based maintenance exercise program after center-based cardiac rehabilitation: effects on blood lipids, body composition, and functional capacity. J Cardiopulm Rehabil2000; 20(1): 50–56.
10.
WillichSN. Cardiac risk factors, medication, and recurrent clinical events after acute coronary disease. A prospective cohort study. Eur Heart J2001; 22(4): 307–313.
11.
MooreSMRulandCMPashkowFJ. Women’s patterns of exercise following cardiac rehabilitation. Nurs Res1998; 47(6): 318–324.
GregorySBostockYBackett-MilburnK. Recovering from a heart attack: a qualitative study into lay experiences and the struggle to make lifestyle changes. Family Pract2006; 23(2): 220–225.
14.
ClarkAMHartlingLVandermeerB. Secondary prevention programmes for coronary heart disease: a meta-regression showing the merits of shorter, generalist, primary care-based interventions. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2007; 14(4): 538–546.
15.
ReidRDDafoeWAMorrinL. Impact of program duration and contact frequency on efficacy and cost of cardiac rehabilitation: results of a randomized trial. Am Heart J2005; 149(5): 862–868.
16.
BellgAJ. Maintenance of health behavior change in preventive cardiology: internalization and self-regulation of new behaviors. Behav Modif2003; 27(1): 103–131.
17.
McKeeGBannonJKerinsM. Changes in diet, exercise and stress behaviours using the stages of change model in cardiac rehabilitation patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs2007; 6(3): 233–240.
18.
MaesSKarolyP. Self-regulation assessment and intervention in physical health and illness: a review. Appl Psychol2005; 54(2): 267–299.
19.
RothmanAJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol2000; 19(1 Suppl): 64–69.
20.
MichieSAbrahamCWhittingtonC. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol2009; 28(6): 690–701.
21.
WingRRTateDFGorinAA. A self-regulation program for maintenance of weight loss. N Eng J Med2006; 355(15): 1563–1571.
22.
HuismanSDDe GuchtVDusseldorpE. The effect of weight reduction interventions for persons with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis from a self-regulation perspective. Diabetes Educ2011; 35(5): 818–835.
23.
SniehottaFFFuhrmannBKiwusU. Long-term effects of two psychological interventions on physical exercise and self-regulation following coronary rehabilitation. Int J Behav Med2005; 12(4): 244–255.
24.
KnittleKMaesSde GuchtV. Psychological interventions for rheumatoid arthritis: examining the role of self-regulation with a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis Care Res2010; 62(10): 1460–1472.
25.
LearSAPritchardPHFrohlichJJ. Extensive lifestyle management intervention following cardiac rehabilitation: pilot study. Rehabil Nurs2002; 26(6): 227–232.
26.
LearSAIgnaszewskiALindenW. The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation trial. Eur Heart J2003; 24(21): 1920–1927.
27.
LearSABrozicAPritchardPH. A randomized controlled trial of an extensive lifestyle management intervention (ELMI) following cardiac rehabilitation: study design and baseline data. Curr Control Trials Cardiovasc Med2005; 3(1): 9–9.
28.
LearSASpinelliJJLindenW. The Extensive Lifestyle Management Intervention (ELMI) after cardiac rehabilitation: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J2006; 152(2): 333–339.
29.
LisspersJNordlanderROhmanA. Behavioral effects of a comprehensive, multifactorial program for lifestyle change after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: a prospective, randomized controlled study. J Psychosom Res1999; 46(2): 143–154.
30.
LisspersJHofman-BangCRydnL. Long-term effects of lifestyle behavior change in coronary artery disease: effects on recurrent coronary events after percutaneous coronary intervention. Health Psychol2005; 24(1): 41–48.
31.
GroupTVHS. Influence on lifestyle measures and five-year coronary risk by a comprehensive lifestyle intervention programme in patients with coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2003; 10(6): 429–437.
32.
GiannuzziPTemporelliPLMarchioliR. Global secondary prevention strategies to limit event recurrence after myocardial infarction: results of the GOSPEL study, a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Italian Cardiac Rehabilitation Network. Arch Intern Med2008; 168(20): 2194–2204.
33.
NHS/NVVC R-commissie and Hartstichting N. Multidisciplinaire Richtlijn Hartrevalidatie, Utrecht: Drukkerij Pascal, 2011.
34.
MichieSAshfordSSniehottaFF. A refined taxonomy of behaviour change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviours: the CALO-RE taxonomy. Psychol Health2011; 26(11): 1479–1498.
35.
BoutronIMoherDAltmanDG. CONSORT group. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med2008; 148(4): 295⊟310–295⊟310.
36.
PickeringTGHallJEAppelLJ. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association. Hypertension2005; 45(1): 142–161.
37.
RossRBerentzenTBradshawAJ. Does the relationship between waist circumference, morbidity and mortality depend on measurement protocol for waist circumference?Obes Rev2008; 9(4): 312–325.
38.
BravataDMSmith-SpanglerCSundaramV. Using pedometers to increase physical activity: a systematic review. JAMA2007; 298(19): 2296–2304.
39.
BrugJGlanzKVan AssemaP. The impact of computer-tailored feedback and iterative feedback on fat, fruit, and vegetable intake. Health Educ Behav1998; 25(4): 517–531.
40.
BogersRPDagneliePCWesterterpKR. Using a correction factor to correct for overreporting in a food-frequency questionnaire does not improve biomarker-assessed validity of estimates for fruit and vegetable consumption. J Nutr2003; 133(4): 1213–1219.
41.
ArrindellWAEttemaH. Dimensionele structuur, betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van de Nederlandse bewerking van de Symptom Checklist (SCL-90): Gegevens gebaseerd op een fobischen een ‘normale’ populatie [Dimensional structure, reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Dutch version of the Symptom Checklist (SCL-90): data based on a phobic and a ‘normal’ population]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor de Psychologie en haar Grensgebieden1981; 36(2): 77–108.
42.
ErdfelderE. G * Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth2007; 39(2): 175–191.
43.
SimmonsJPNelsonLDSimonsohnU. False-positive psychology: undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychol Sci2011; 22(11): 1359–1366.
44.
ElobeidMAPadillaMAMcVieT. Missing data in randomized clinical trials for weight loss: scope of the problem, state of the field, and performance of statistical methods. PloS One2009; 4(8): e6624–e6624.
45.
YusufSAvezumAPaisP. Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet2004; 364(9438): 937–952.
46.
GiallauriaFLucciRD’AgostinoM. Two-year multicomprehensive secondary prevention program: favorable effects on cardiovascular functional capacity and coronary risk profile after acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Med2009; 10(10): 772–780.
47.
LewingtonSClarkeRQizilbashN. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet2002; 360(9349): 1903–1913.
48.
FernandezRSDavidsonPGriffithsR. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing a health-related lifestyle self-management intervention with standard cardiac rehabilitation following an acute cardiac event: implications for a larger clinical trial. Aust Crit Care2009; 22(1): 17–27.
49.
StrandbergTEPitkalaKHBerglindS. Multifactorial intervention to prevent recurrent cardiovascular events in patients 75 years or older: the Drugs and Evidence-Based Medicine in the Elderly (DEBATE) study: a randomized, controlled trial. Am Heart J2006; 152(3): 585–592.
50.
CoutinhoTGoelKCorrêa de SáD. Central obesity and survival in subjects with coronary artery disease: a systematic review of the literature and collaborative analysis with individual subject data. J Am Coll Cardiol2011; 57(19): 1877–1886.
51.
GoelKThomasRJSquiresRW. Combined effect of cardiorespiratory fitness and adiposity on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J2011; 161(3): 590–597.
52.
BaladyGJWilliamsMAAdesPA. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils. Circulation2007; 115(20): 2675–2682.
53.
Tudor-LockeCHatanoYPangraziRP. Revisiting ‘how many steps are enough?’. Med Sci Sports Exerc2008; 40(7 Suppl): S537–S543.
54.
TaylorRS. Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med2004; 116(10): 682–692.
55.
Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap. Multidisciplinaire richtlijn Cardiovasculair risicomanagement, herziening 2011, Utrecht: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum, 2011.
56.
PiepoliMF. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17(1): 1–17.
57.
World Health Organization. Avoiding heart attacks and stroke, Geneva: WHO, 2005.
58.
Brug J, van Assema P, Kok G, et al. Self-rated dietary fat intake: association with objective assessment of fat, psychosocial factors, and intention to change. J Nutr Educ 1994; 26(5): 218–223.
59.
ClarkAM. A realist study of the mechanisms of cardiac rehabilitation. J Adv Nurs2005; 52(4): 362–371.
60.
Müller-RiemenschneiderFMeinhardCDammK. Effectiveness of nonpharmacological secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2010; 17(6): 688–700.
61.
VanheesLLefevreJPhilippaertsR. How to assess physical activity? How to assess physical fitness?Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil2005; 12(2): 102–114.
62.
ThompsonDRClarkAM. Cardiac rehabilitation: into the future. Heart2009; 95(23): 1897–1900.
