An examination of the American Social Health Association’s (ASHA) 1973 VD is for Everybody campaign showed that it was an attempt to not only combat rising venereal disease rates but also to advance the organization’s views on social morality. The paper used an integration of the cultural-economic model of public relations (CEM) and queer theory as the theoretical framework and the discourse-historical approach (DHA) as the method of inquiry. The CEM was applied to investigate how social norms and organizational rules shaped a discourse of othering. Concurrently, queer theory was employed to contest the binary classifications that othering perpetuates. Complementing the CEM with queer theory helped reveal hidden or implicit ideologies embedded within the campaign discourses, and the DHA further enabled the unpacking of campaign narratives by uncovering how prevailing societal thought patterns shaped collective perceptions and understanding of diverse subjects.
Ad Council (1973) VD is for Everybody [Public Service Announcements]. ASHA Papers. Box 193, Folder 13.
2.
AndersonWB (2017) Social movements and public relations in the early twentieth century: How one group used public relations to curtail venereal disease rates. Journal of Public Relations Research29: 3–15.
3.
AndersonWB (2018) “The next great plague to go”: How the U.S. Surgeon General used public relations to fight venereal disease during the Great Depression. Journalism History44: 63–69.
4.
AndersonWB (2019a) Public relations and social morality as national identity: A cultural-economic examination of the U.S. government’s fight against venereal disease in the 1920s. Journal of Public Relations Research30: 184–201.
5.
AndersonWB (2019b) How to keep Rosie the riveter from contracting VD: A case study of how U.S. social reformers used public relations during World War II. Public Relations Review45: 101787.
6.
AndersonW (2020) A cultural-economic examination of public relations measurement in the 1920s and its implications for contemporary practice. Corporate Communications: An International Journal25(4): 669–685.
7.
Anti-V.D. drive is “for Everybody” (1973) New York Times.
8.
ASHA (1974) The Association’s annual report of 1973. Social Health News49(2): Social Welfare Archives, University of Minnesota, Corporate Records, Annual Reports, Program Reports, Annual Reports, Box 20, Folder 05.
9.
BalankoSL (2002) Good sex? A critical review of school sex education. Guidance and Counseling17: 117–123.
10.
BledsteinBJohnstonR (2001) The Middling Sorts: Explorations in the History of the American Middle Class. London: Routledge.
11.
BrandtAM (1985) No Magic Bullet: A Social History of Venereal Disease in the United States since 1880. Oxford: Oxford University.
12.
CiszekE (2018) Queering PR: Directions in theory and research for public relations scholarship. Journal of Public Relations Research30: 134–145.
13.
CiszekERodriguezNS (2020) Power, agency and resistance in public relations: A queer of color critique of the Houston Equal Rights Ordinance. Communication, Culture, and Critique13(4): 536–555.
14.
CiszekEPlaceKRLoganN (2022) Critical humanism for public relations: Harnessing the synergy of gender, race and sexuality research. Public Relations Review48(1): 102151.
15.
CurtinP (2022) The cultural-economic model of public relations theory and practice. In: PompperDPlaceKRWeaverCK (eds) The Routledge Companion to Public Relations. New York: Routledge, pp. 149–161.
16.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2005) Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research17: 91–115.
17.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2007) International Public Relations: Negotiating Culture, Identity, and Power. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
18.
CurtinPAGaitherTKCiszekE (2016) Articulating public relations practice and critical/cultural theory through a cultural-economic lens. In: L’EtangJMcKieDSnowN, et al. (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations. London: Routledge, pp. 41–53.
19.
DankelT (2022) The eugenic logic of sexual normality. In: EarpBDChambersCWatsonL (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Sex and Sexuality. New York: Routledge, pp. 359–374.
20.
du GayPHallSJanesLMackayHNegusK, et al. (1997) The story of the Sony Walkman. Culture, Media, & Identities1–39.
21.
FaircloughNMulderrigJWodakR (2011) Critical discourse analysis. In: Van DijkTA (ed) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 357–379.
22.
FreedenM (2017) After the Brexit referendum: Revisiting populism as an ideology. Journal of Political Ideologies22(1): 1–11.
23.
GaitherTKCurtinPA (2018) Articulating national identity in postcolonial democracies: Defining relations and interests through competing publics. In: JonsonJPieczka (eds) Public Interest Communication: Critical Debates and Global Contexts. New York: Routledge, pp. 113–132.
24.
GustAYLovaasKEEliaJP (2003) Introduction: Queering communication: Starting the conversation. Journal of Homosexuality45(2-4): 1–10.
25.
HaffnerDW (1989) SIECUS: 25 years of commitment to sexual health and education. SIECUS Report17(4): 1–4.
26.
HallS (1997) Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.
27.
HaysS (1996) The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood. New Haven: Yale University.
28.
IrvineJM (2004) Talk about Sex: The Battles over Sex Education in the United States. Berkeley: University of California.
29.
JensenRE (2010) Dirty Words: The Rhetoric of Public Sex Education, 1870-1924. Champagne: University of Illinois.
30.
KahnemanWC (1989) Why the need for a sex information and education Council of the United States as a new, separate organization. SIECUS Report17(4): 13–17.
31.
KellyCR (2016) Chastity for democracy: Surplus repression and the rhetoric of sex education. Quarterly Journal of Speech102(4): 353–375.
32.
Kelly-HankuAAggletonPShihP (2018) I shouldn’t talk of medicine only: Biomedical and religious frameworks for understanding antiretroviral therapies, their invention and their effects. Global Public Health13(10): 1454–1467.
33.
KennyLD (2000) Daughters of Suburbia: Growing up White, Middle Class, and Female. New Brunswick: Rutgers University.
34.
LaddEC (1978) Opinion roundup: Left, right or center-Which way are we going. Public Opinion. Public Opinion, 7, 33–40.
35.
LoganNCiszekE (2021) At the intersection of race, gender and sexuality: A queer of color critique of public relations habitus. Journal of Public Relations Research33(6): 487–503.
36.
LópezFMolnarAJohnsonR, et al. (2021) Understanding the Attacks on Critical Race Theory. Boulder: National Education Policy Center.
37.
LordAM (2010) Condom Nation: The U.S. Government’s Sex Education Campaign from World War I to the Internet. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
38.
LuptonD (2016) The Quantified Self. Malden: John Wiley & Sons.
39.
McCannHMonaghanW (2019) Queer Theory Now: From Foundations to Futures. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
40.
MehlmanN (2007) Sex ed… and the reds? Reconsidering the anaheim battle over sex education, 1962–1969. History of Education Quarterly47: 203–232.
41.
MoranJP (2000) Teaching Sex: The Shaping of Adolescence in the 20th Century. Cambridge: Harvard University.
42.
Ofori-ParkuSSKoomsonP (2023) Corporate sustainability as a hegemonic discourse of globalization: The discourse-historical approach as a critical issues and stakeholder analysis tool. Public Relations Review49(1): 102275.
43.
PetrzelaNP (2015) Classroom Wars: Language, Sex, and the Making of Modern Political Culture. London: Oxford.
44.
ReisiglM (2017) The discourse-historical approach. In: ReisiglM (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 44–59.
45.
ReisiglMWodakR (2009) Discourse-historical approach. In: WodakRMeyerM (eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Sage, pp. 87–123.
46.
ReisiglMWodakR (2015) Discourse and racism. In: TannenDHamiltonHESchiffrinD (eds) The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 372–397.
47.
RosenR (2000) The World Split Open: How the Modern Women’s Movement Changed America. New York: Penguin.
48.
SamuelLR (2012) The American Dream: A Cultural History. Syracuse. Syracuse: Syracuse University.
49.
SeidmanS (1992) Embattled Eros: Sexual Politics and Ethics in Contemporary America. New York: Routledge.
50.
ShaBL (2018) Editor’s essay: Identity and/in/of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research30(4): 129–133.
51.
ShahCQ (2015) Sex Ed, Segregated: The Quest for Sexual Knowledge in Progressive-Era America. Rochester: University of Rochester.
52.
ShankarS (2019) Nothing sells like whiteness: Race, ontology, and American advertising. American Anthropologist122: 112–119.
53.
SIECUS (1972) SIECUS publications order form. SIECUS Report1(1): 15.
54.
Van LeeuwenT (2013) The representation of social actors. In: Caldas-CouthardCRCoulthardM (eds) Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 41–79.
55.
WarnerM (1999) The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge: Harvard University.
56.
WebsterB (1973, October 30) The Need for Public Information in Venereal Disease Control in the United States Today. New York: Advertising Council. [press conference transcript].
57.
WodakR (2009) The semiotics of racism: A critical discourse-historical analysis. In: RenkemaJ (ed) Discourse, of Course: An Overview of Research in Discourse Studies. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 311–326.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
