In mainstream public relations, the word “activist” has a negative connotation of one who disrupts an organization’s financial well-being. This is because mainstream public relations takes a modernist stance that valorizes the organization’s interests above all else. Postmodern scholars such as Holtzhausen (2012), however, urge public relations practitioners themselves to take an activist stance when confronted with organizational malpractices. Holtzhausen (2012) especially points out new media as tools with which the discursive space between stakeholders and organizations can be democratized. This study will explore the barriers to and the consequences of such activism as faced by public relations practitioners who resisted their employers over malpractices. We will also examine what form their activism took and how these public relations practitioner-activists leveraged the power of new media in their organizational activism.
BergerBKReberBH (2006) Gaining Influence in Public Relations: The Role of Resistance in Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
BestSKellnerD (1991) Postmodern Theory. New York: The Guilford Press.
3.
CharmazK (2011) The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds), Grounded Theory Methods in Social Justice Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 359–380.
4.
CheneyGChristensenLT (2001) Public relations as contested terrain a critical response. In: HeathRL (ed), Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 167–182.
5.
CiszekEL (2016) Digital activism: how social media and dissensus inform theory and practice. Public Relations Review42: 314–321.
6.
CoombsWT (1998) The internet as potential equalizer: new leverage for confronting social irresponsibility. Public Relations Review24(3): 289–303.
7.
CreswellJW (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
8.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2005) Privileging identity, difference, and power: the circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research17(2): 91–115.
9.
CurtinPA (2015) Exploring articulation in internal activism and public relations theory: a case study. Journal of Public Relations Research28(1): 19–34.
10.
DetertJREdmondsonAC (2007) Why employees are afraid to speak. Harvard Business Review85(5): 23–25.
11.
DozierDM (1992) The Organizational Roles of Communications and Public Relations Practitioners. In: GunigJEet al. (ed), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 327–355.
12.
DozierDMLauzenMM (2000) Liberating the intellectual domain from the practice: public relations, activism, and the role of the scholar. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 3–22.
13.
DuhéSC (2017) New Media and Public Relations. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
14.
DuhéSC (2007) Power, resistance, and social change. In: DuhéSC (ed), New Media and Public Relations. New York, NY: Peter Lang .Publishing Inc, pp. 173–174.
15.
DuttaMJPalM (2007) The internet as a site of resistance the case of narmada bachao andolan. In: DuhéSC (ed), New Media and Public Relations. New York, NY: Peter Lang Publishing Inc, pp. 203–215.
16.
GreenwoodCA (2015) Whistleblowing in the fortune 1000: what practitioners told us about wrongdoing in corporations in a pilot study. Public Relations Review41: 490–500.
17.
GregoryA (2015) Practitioner-leaders’ representation of roles: the melbourne mandate. Public Relations Review41(5): 598–606.
18.
GrunigJEGrunigLADozierDM (2006) The excellence theory. In: BotanCHHazletonV (eds), Public Relations Theory II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 21–62.
19.
GrunigLA (1992) Activism: how it limits the effectiveness of organizations and how excellent public relations departments respond. In: GrunigJEDozierDMEhlingWP, et al. (eds), Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. HillsdaleN.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 503–530.
20.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1989) Fourth Generation Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
21.
HanGZhangA (2009) Starbucks is forbidden in the Forbidden city: blog, circuit of culture and informal public relations campaign in China. Public Relations Review35: 395–401.
22.
HillJW (1958) Corporate Public Relations: Arm of Modern Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.
23.
HoltzhausenDR (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
24.
HoltzhausenDR (2002) Towards a postmodern research agenda for public relations. Public Relations Review28: 251–264.
25.
HoltzhausenDR (2011) The need for a postmodern turn in global public relations. In: BardhanNWeaverCK (eds), Public Relations in Global Cultural Contexts: Multi-Paradigmatic Perspective. New York: Routledge, pp. 140–166.
26.
HoltzhausenDR (2012) Public Relations as Activism: Postmodern Approaches to Theory & Practice. New York: Routledge.
27.
HuangJBaptistaJGalliersRD (2013) Reconceptualizing rhetorical practices in organizations: the impact of social media on internal communications. Information & Management50: 112–124.
28.
KennedyAKSommerfeldtEJ (2015) A postmodern turn for social media research: theory and research directions for public relations. Atlantic Journal of Communication23: 21–45.
29.
LindlofTRTaylorBC (2002) Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
LyotardJF (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
31.
MacnamaraJ (2016) Organizational listening: addressing a major gap in public relations theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research28(3—4): 146–169.
32.
MaddenSBrownKXuS (2019) Empowering the future practitioner: postmodernism in the undergraduate public relations classroom. Journal of Public Relations Education5(2): 105–131.
33.
McCowenN (2007) The role of public relations with internal activists. Journal of Public Relations Research19(1): 47–68.
34.
MickeyTJ (1997) A postmodern view of public relations: sign and reality. Public Relations Review23(3): 2271–2284.
35.
MillsJBonnerAFrancisK (2006) The development of constructivist grounded theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 1–10.
36.
PalMDuttaMJ (2008) Public relations in a global context: the relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research20: 159–179.
ShinJBroadusTFisherMT, et al. (2017) The use of blogging as online grassroots activism analysis of the scott sisters case. In: DuhéS (ed), New Media and Public Relations. New York: Peter Lang Publishing Inc.
39.
SimS (2011) Postmodernism and philosophy. In: SimS (ed), The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–14.
40.
SommerfeldtEJKentMLTaylorM (2012) Activist practitioner perspectives of website public relations: why aren’t activist websites fulfilling the dialogic promise?Public Relations Review38: 303–312.
41.
TaylorMKentMLWhiteWJ (2001) How activist organizations are using the internet to build relationships. Public Relations Review27: 263–284.
42.
TaylorVEWinquistCE (eds), (2001) Encyclopedia of Postmodernism. New York: Routledge.
43.
ThompsonW (2004) Postmodernism and History. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
TothEL (2002) Postmodernism for modernist public relations: the cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review28: 243–250.
45.
TylerL (2005) Towards a postmodern understanding of crisis communication. Public Relations Review31: 566–571.
46.
Van Den AbbeeleG (1998) Postmodernism and critical theory. In: SimS (ed), The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. New York: Routledge, pp. 15–23.
47.
Van DijkJ (2012) The Network Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
