Involving stakeholders in organizational decisions is essential in the present sustainability movement, associated with the social license to operate and specific forms of communication in, from and about organizations with an impact orientation. This paper introduces a concept of strategic problematization of sustainability for transformation as innovative approach to Public Relations (PR), acknowledging the plurality of agonistic voices in stakeholder engagement processes in social, cultural and environmental transformations and challenging the normative concept of dialogue and solution- and consensus-oriented approaches to date. The article discusses the transformative potential of PR by reframing dissent and introducing problematization as ability to agonize and, therefore, as key process of constructive strategic communication for sustainable development. Three conversational procedures in water (scarcity) management on a local, national and international level were chosen to explore the potential of strategic problematization in relation to sustainability as normative framework of today’s society. The implications of the case studies and the conceptual framework expand existing engagement theories with a critical perspective and manifest the transformative potential of PR for a sustainable future.
AdlerRP (2005) What do we mean by “civic engagement”?Journal of Transformative Education3(3): 236–253.
2.
AllenM (2016) Strategic Communication for Sustainable Organizations: Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer.
3.
BacchiC (2012) Why study problematizations? Making politics visible. Open Journal of Political Science2(1): 1–8.
4.
BanerjeeSB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Critical Sociology34(1): 51–79.
5.
BarthMGodemannJRieckmannM, et al. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal for Sustainability in Higher Education8(4): 416–430.
6.
BjornARichardsonKHauschildMZ (2019) Framework for development and communication of absolute environmental sustainability assessment methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology23(4):838–854.
7.
BotanC (1997) Ethics in strategic communication campaigns: The case for a new approach to public relations. Journal of Business Communication34: 188–202.
8.
BrackinP, et al. (2011). Institutionalized: Organizational obstacles to communicating sustainability. In: IEEE international professional communication conference, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 17–19October, 2011, pp.1–5. IEEE.
9.
BrymanA (2016) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
BurkartR (2007) On Jürgen Habermas and public relations. Public Relations Review33(3): 249–254.
11.
BurnsHL (2015) Transformative sustainability pedagogy: Learning from ecological systems and indigenous wisdom. Journal of Transformative Education13(3): 259–276.
12.
CallonMLatourB (1981) Unscrewing the Big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-CetinaKCicourelAV (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp.277–303.
13.
CarrollAB (1999). Corporate social responsibility. Evolution of a definitional construct. Business & Society38(3): 268–295.
14.
ChaudhuriAJayaremJ (2018) A socio-technical view of performance impact of integrated quality and sustainability strategies. International Journal of Production Research57(5): 1478–1496.
15.
ChristensenLTMorsingMThyssenO (2013) CSR as aspirational talk. Organization20(3): 372–393.
16.
CorusCOzanneJL (2012) Stakeholder engagement: Building participatory and deliberative spaces in subsistence markets. Journal of Business Research65(12): 1728–1735.
17.
CrableREVibbertSL (1985) Managing issues and influencing public policy. Public Relations Review11(2): 3–15.
18.
CraneAMattenD (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective. NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
19.
CraneAMcWilliamsAMattenD, et al. (eds.) (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
CreswellJW (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions, 2nd edn.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
21.
CrottyMJ (1998) The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
22.
DadeAHassenzahlD (2013). Communicating sustainability: A content analysis of website communications in the United States. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education14(3): 254–263.
23.
DavidsonS (2016) Public relations theory: An agonistic critique of the turns to dialogue and symmetry. Public Relations Inquiry5(2): 145–167.
24.
DavidsonS (2018) Organisational rhetoric in deeply pluralistic societies: The agonistic alternative. In: IhlenØHeathR (eds.) The Handbook of Organizational Rhetoric and Communication. Wiley Blackwell: Oxford.
25.
DavidsonSMotionJ (2017) On Mouffe: Radical pluralism and public relations. In: IhlenØFredrikssonM (eds.) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. (2nd Expanded Edition). New York: Routledge, pp. 394–413.
26.
DawkinsC (2015) Agonistic pluralism and stakeholder engagement. Business Ethics Quarterly25(01): 1–28.
27.
DeaconR (2006) Michel Foucault on education: A preliminary theoretical overview. South African Journal of Education26: 177–187.
28.
de CerteauM (1988) The Writing of History. Columbia University Press.
29.
DeGeorgRT (2009) Business Ethics, 7th edn.New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
30.
DekkerPHalmanL (2003). The Values of Volunteering: Cross-Cultural Perspectives. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
31.
DiehlSKarmasinMMuellerB, et al. (eds) (2017). Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. Springer, Cham.
32.
DozierDMGrunigJEGrunigLA (1995) Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
33.
EisenhardtKM (1989) Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review14(4): 532–550.
34.
ElvingWGolobUPodnarK, et al. (2015) Guest editorial: The bad, the ugly and the good: New challenges for CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal20(2): 118–127.
FadeevaZ (2005) Promise of sustainability collaboration - potential fulfilled?Journal of Cleaner Production13(2): 165–174.
37.
FlyverboomMChristensenLTHansenHK (2015) The transparency-power nexus. Management Communication Quarterly29(3): 385–410.
38.
FoucaultM (1977) Language, Counter-Memory, Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews. BouchardDFSimonS (Trans.). Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
39.
FoucaultM (1988) The concern for truth. In: KritzmanLD (ed.) Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture. Interviews and Other Writings, 1977-1984. Trans. A Sheridan. New York: Routledge, pp.255–267
40.
FoucaultM (1991) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. University of Chicago Press.
41.
FrankAK (2017) What is the story with sustainability? A narrative analysis of diverse and contested understandings. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences7: 310–323.
42.
FreemanRE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Massachusetts: Pitman Publishing Inc.
43.
FreemanREHarrisonJSWicksAC, et al. (2010) Stakeholder Theory. The State of the Art. New York: Cambridge University Press.
44.
FriedmanALMilesS (2006) Stakeholders: Theory and Practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
45.
GaneshSStohlC (2014). Collective action, community organizing and social movements. In: MumbyDPutnamL (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Communication, 3rd edn.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, pp.743–765.
46.
GaneshSZollerHM (2012) Dialogue, activism, and democratic social change. Communication Theory22(1): 66–91.
47.
GaneshSZollerHCheneyG (2005) Transforming resistance, broadening our boundaries: Critical organizational communication meets globalization from below. Communication Monographs72(2): 169–191.
48.
GarnerJT (2009) Strategic dissent: Expressions of organizational dissent motivated by influence goals. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(1): 34–51.
49.
GarnerJT (2016) Simulating dissent: Mapping the life span of organizational dissent using agent-based modeling. Western Journal of Communication80(4): 414–434.
50.
GencR (2017). The importance of communication in sustainability & sustainable strategies. Procedia Manufacturing8: 511–516.
GolobUBartlettJL (2007) Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review33(1): 1–9.
53.
GolobUWederFPodnarK, et al. (2019). Re-imagining the sustainable consumer. CSR Communication Conference. Proceedings5: 70–74.
54.
GreenwoodM (2007) Stakeholder engagement: Beyond the myth of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics74(4): 315–327.
55.
GrunigLA (1992) Activism: How it limits the effectiveness of organizations and how excellent public relations departments respond. In: GrunigJE (ed.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates, pp.503–530.
56.
GrunigJHuntT (1984) Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
57.
HallgrenL (2016) Reframing conflict in natural resource management: Mutuality, reciprocity and pluralistic agonism as dynamics of community constructivity and destructivity. In: PetersonTRBergeåHFeldpaush-ParkerAMRaitioK (eds.) Environmental Communication and Community: Constructive and Destructive Dynamics of Social Transformation. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.16–30.
58.
HallgrenLBergeåHWestbergL (2018) Communication problems when participants disagree (or avoid disagreeing) in dialogues in swedish natural resource management—challenges to agonism in practice. Frontiers in Communication3: 2018.00056.
59.
HaroldC (2004) Pranking rhetoric: “culture jamming” as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication21(3): 189–211.
60.
HoffmannJ (2018) Talking into (non)existence: Denying or constituting paradoxes of corporate social responsibility. Human Relations71(5): 668–691.
61.
HoltzhausenD (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
62.
HuangLClarkeAHeldsingerN, et al. (2019) The communication role of social media in social marketing: A study of the community sustainability knowledge dissemination on LinkedIn and Twitter. Journal of Marketing Analytics7(2): 64–75.
63.
HurstBIhlenO (2018) Corporate Social Responsibility and Engagement: Commitment, Mapping of Responsibilities, and Closing the Loop. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
64.
IdowuSOCapaldiNZuL, et al. (2013) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Heidelberg: Springer.
65.
IhlenØvan RulerB (2007) How public relations works: Theoretical roots and public relations perspectives. Public Relations Review33(3): 243–248.
66.
IhlenØvan RulerB (2009) Introduction: Applying social theory to public relations. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds.) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.1–20.
67.
JarolimekSWederF (2017) Organizing CSR communication: Challenges for integrated CSR communication from a PR and organizational communication perspective. In: DiehlSKarmasinMMuellerB, et al (eds.) Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. Berlin: Springer, pp.109–128.
68.
JohnstonKALaneA (2018) Building relational capital: The contribution of episodic and relational community engagement. Public Relation Review44(5): 633–644.
69.
KassingJK (2011) Stressing out about dissent: Examining the relationship between coping strategies and dissent expression. Communication Research Reports28(3): 225–234.
70.
KentMLTaylorM (1998) Building dialogic relationships through the World Wide Web. Public Relations Review24: 273–288.
71.
KentMLTaylorM (2002) Toward a dialogic theory of public relations. Public Relations Review28(1): 21–37.
72.
KimJ-NSrirameshK (2009) A descriptive model of activism in global public relations research and practice. In: SrirameshKrishnamurthyVercicDejan (eds.) The Global Public Relations Handbook, 2nd edn.New York: Routledge, pp.79–97.
73.
KunstmanARattleI (2019) Towards a paradigmatic shift in sustainability studies: A systematic review of peer reviewed literature and future agenda setting to consider environmental (un)sustainability of digital communication. Environmental Communication13(5): 567–581.
74.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. London: Verso Books.
75.
LaszloJ (1997) Narrative organization of social representations. Papers on Social Representations6(2): 155–172.
76.
LekakisEJ (2017) Economic nationalism and the cultural politics of consumption under austerity: The rise of ethnocentric consumption in Greece. Journal of Consumer Culture17(2): 286–302.
77.
L’EtangJ (2008) Public Relations: Concepts, Practice and Critique. London: Sage.
78.
L’EtangJMcKieDSnowN, et al. (eds.) (2015) The Routledge Handbook of Critical Public Relations. Routledge.
79.
LineaNDHanksbLZhangcL (2016) Sustainability communication: The effect of message construals on consumers’ attitudes towards green restaurants. International Journal of Hospitality Management57: 143–151.
80.
MaltsevaKFieselerCTrittin-UlbrichH (2019) The challenges of gamifying CSR communication. Corporate Communications: An International Journal24(1): 44–62.
81.
MayringP (2002) Qualitative content analysis - research instrument or mode of interpretation? In: KiegelmannM (ed.) The Role of the Researcher in Qualitative Psychology. Tübingen: Huber, pp.139–148.
82.
MezirowJ (2000) Learning as Transformation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
83.
MilsteinTPulosA (2015) Culture jam pedagogy and practice: Relocating culture by staying on one’s toes. Communication, Culture & Critique8(3): 395–413.
84.
MouffeC (2005) On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.
85.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London, UK: Verso.
86.
MurrayKBVogelCM (1997) ‘Using a hierarchy-of effects approach to gauge the effectiveness of corporate social responsibility to generate goodwill toward the firm: Financial versus non financial impacts’. Journal of Business Research38: 141–159.
87.
NewigJSchulzDFischerD, et al. (2013) Communication regarding sustainability: Conceptual perspectives and exploration of societal subsystems. Sustainability5: 2976–2990.
O’BrianHCairnsP (2016). Why Engagement Matters. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives of User Engagement in Digital Media. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
90.
O’RiordanLFairbrassJ (2014) Managing CSR stakeholder engagement: A new conceptual framework. Journal of Business Ethics125(1): 121–145.
91.
ParkerSParkerM (2017) Antagonism, accommodation and agonism in critical management studies: Alternative organizations allies. Human Relations70(11): 1366–1387.
92.
PearsonR (1989) Business ethics as communication ethics: Public relations and the idea of dialogue. In: BotanCHHazletonVJr (eds.) Public Relations Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.111–131.
93.
PetersonTRFranksRR (2006) Environmental conflict communication. In: OetzelJGTing-ToomeyS (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Conflict Communication: Integrating Theory and Practice. London: Sage, pp.513–536.
94.
PieczkaM (2011) Public relations as dialogic expertise?Journal of Communication Management15(2): 108–124.
95.
PieczkaM (2015) Dialogue and critical public relations. In: L’EtangJMcKieDSnowN, et al (eds.) The Routledge Critical Handbook of Public Relations. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.76–89.
96.
PompperD (2015) Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and Public Relations: Negotiating Multiple Complex Challenges. Routledge.
97.
RaitioK (2016) “Seized and missed opportunities in responding to conflicts. Constructivity and destructivity in forest conflict management in Finland and British Columbia, Canada. In: PetersonTRBergeåHLFeldpausch-ParkerAM, et al. (eds.) Environmental Communication and Community: Constructive and Destructive Dynamics of Social Transformation. London: Routledge, pp.229–248.
98.
RascheAMorsingMMoonJ (2017) Corporate Social Responsibility. Strategy, Communication, Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
99.
RenggliC (2007) The eventualization of evidences: An analysis of the relationships between sayabilities and visibilities after foucault. Forum: Qualitative Social Research8(2).
100.
RoperJ (2005) Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony?Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 69–86.
101.
RoperJ (2012) Environmental risk, sustainability discourses, and public relations. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 69–87.
102.
RosegrantMWClineSValmonte-SantosR (2010) Global water and food security: megatrends and emerging issues. In: RinglerCBiswasAKClineS (eds.) Global Change: Impacts on Water and Food Security. Heidelberg: Springer, pp.17–47.
103.
RowleyTJMoldoveanuM (2003) When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. The Academy of Management Review18(2): 204–219.
104.
SadlerS (1999) The Situationist City. Cambridge: MIT Press.
105.
SmithJAFlowerPLarkinM (2009) Interpretative phenomenological analysis: Theory, method and research. Qualitative Research in Psychology6(4): 346–347.
106.
SommerfeldtEJYangA (2018) Notes on a dialogue: Twenty years of digital dialogic communication research in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research30(3): 59–64.
107.
SteculaAMerkleyE (2019) Framing climate change: Economics, ideology, and uncertainty in american news media content from 1988 to 2014. Frontiers in Communication4: 2019.00006.
108.
SprainLTimpsonWM (2012) Pedagogy for Sustainability Science: Case-Based Approaches for Interdisciplinary Instruction. Environmental Communication6(4): 532–550.
109.
StebbinsRA (2015) Leisure and the Motive to Volunteer. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
110.
SteynBNiemannL (2014) Strategic role of public relations in enterprise strategy, governance and sustainability - A normative framework. Public Relations Review40(2): 171–183.
111.
TarrowS (2012) Power in Movement: Collective Action, Social Movements and Politics, 2nd edn.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
112.
TaylorMKentML (2014) Dialogic engagement: Clarifying foundational concepts. Journal of Public Relations Research26(5): 384–398.
113.
TheunissenPWan NoordinWN (2012) Revisiting the concept “dialogue” in public relations. Public Relations Review38(1): 5–13.
114.
UldamJVestergaardA (2015) Civic Engagement and Social Media: Political Participation Beyond Protest. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
UN (2019b). Sustainable development goal 6. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg6 (accessed 05 November 2019).
WederF (2009) Organisationskommunikation und Public Relations. Wien: facultas.
119.
WederF (2017a) CSR as common sense issue. In: DiehlSKarmasinMMuellerB, et al (eds.) Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication. Berlin: Springer, pp.23–36.
120.
WederF (2017b) Problematization of water supply and the risk of scarcity. Results of international case studies and narrative interviews. Final report. Klagenfurt, University.
121.
WederF (2021) Sustainability as master frame of the future? Potency and limits of sustainability as normative framework in corporate, political and NGO communication. The Sustainability Communication Reader: A Reflective Compendium, 103–119.
122.
WederFEinwillerSEberweinT (2019b) Heading for new shores. Impact orientation of CSR communication and the need for communicative responsibility. Corporate Communications: An International Journal24(2): 198–211.
123.
WederFKoinigIVociD (2019c) Antagonistic framing of sustainability by energy suppliers: Dissecting corporate CSR messages in a cross-cultural comparison. Corporate Communication: An International Journal24(2): 368–390.
124.
WederFLemkeSTungaratA (2019a). (Re)storying sustainability: The use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability11(19): 52–64.
125.
WenmanM (2013) Agonistic Democracy: Constituent Power in the Era of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
126.
WhelanG (2013) Corporate constructed and dissent enabling public spheres: Differentiating dissensual from consensual corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics115(4): 755–769.
127.
WinklerPThummesK (2019) Responsibility by opacity, dissent, and re-articulation. Outlines of an agonistic Public Relations. Presentation held at the KWT, Vienna, April 2019.
128.
YangATaylorM (2013) The relationship between the professionalization of public relations, societal social capital and democracy: Evidence from a cross-national study. Public Relations Review39(4): 257–270.
129.
YinRK (2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th edn.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
130.
ŽižekS (2009) First As Tragedy, Then As Farce. Verso Books, London: United Kingdom.
