A recent critical turn to both public relations and institutional studies has highlighted ‘agency’ as a shared important theme. While public relations scholars call to bring back ‘agency’ into analysis of practice and process of public relations, neo-institutionalists use ‘agency’ to explain heterogeneity and innovation in institutional outcomes. In this context, this article proposes to use ‘agency’ as a meeting ground to explore how the two disciplines could engage in a dialogue that improves mutual understanding and theoretical enrichment of each other. It argues that institutional thoughts such as ‘embedded agency’, ‘institutional entrepreneurship’ and ‘institutional work’ advance understandings of the downplayed issues of power, diversity and activism in the public relations literature. In turn, the multi-paradigmatic public relations scholarship provides useful tools for analysing institutional agency. Also, this article discusses future research agenda to advance fruitful collaboration between the two domains.
BattilanaJD’AunnoT (2009) Institutional work and the paradox of embedded agency. In: LawrenceTBSuddabyRLecaB (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.31–58.
2.
BitektineAHaackP (2015) The ‘macro’ and the ‘micro’ of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review40(1): 49–75.
3.
BorchersTA (2013) Persuasion and Ethics in the Media Age. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
4.
BotanCHTaylorM (2004) Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication54(4): 645–661.
5.
BoxenbaumEStrandgaard PedersenJ (2009) Scandinavian institutionalism: A case of institutional work. In: LawrenceTBSuddabyRLecaB (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.178–204.
6.
BrownRE (2015) The Public Relations of Everything: The Ancient, Modern and Postmodern Dramatic History of an Idea. New York: Routledge.
7.
CleggS (2010) The state, power and agency: Missing in action in institutional theory?Journal of Management Inquiry19(4): 4–14.
8.
ClementeMRouletTJ (2015) Public opinion as a source of deinstitutionalization: A ‘spiral of silence’ approach. Academy of Management Review40(1): 96–114.
9.
CloutierCDenisJLangleyA, et al. (2016) Agency at the managerial interface: Public sector reform as institutional work. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory26: 259–276.
10.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2012) Fringe public relations: How activism moves critical PR toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review38: 880–887.
11.
CornelissenJPDurandRFissPC, et al. (2015) Putting communication front and center in institutional theory and analysis. Academy of Management Review40(1): 10–27.
12.
DelbridgeREdwardsT (2007) Reflections on developments in institutional theory: Toward a relational approach. Scandinavian Journal of Management23: 191–205.
13.
DemetriousK (2013) Public Relations, Activism, and Social Change: Speaking Up. Abingdon: Routledge.
14.
DiMaggioPJ (1988) Interest and agency in institutional theory. In: ZuckerLZ (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge: Ballinger, pp.3–22.
15.
EdwardsL (2009) Symbolic power and public relations practice: Locating individual practitioners in their social context. Journal of Public Relations Research21(3): 251–272.
16.
EdwardsL (2018) Understanding Public Relations: Theory, Culture and Society. London: Sage.
17.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
18.
FrandsenFJohansenW (2009) Institutionalizing crisis communication in the public sector: An explorative study in Danish municipalities. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(2): 102–115.
19.
FrandsenFJohansenWSalo-MonsenHH (2016) Responding to institutional complexity: Reputation and crisis management in Danish municipalities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration20(2): 7–38.
20.
FredrikssonMPallasJWehmeierS (2013) Public relations and neo-institutional theory. Public Relations Inquiry2(2): 183–203.
21.
GarudRHardyCMaguireS (2007) Institutional entrepreneurship as embedded agency: An introduction to the special issue. Organization Studies28(7): 957–969.
22.
GiddensA (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of a Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
GrandienCJohanssonC (2012) Institutionalization of communication management: A theoretical framework. Corporate Communication: An International Journal17(2): 209–227.
24.
GrandienCJohanssonC (2016) Organizing and disorganizing strategic communication: Discursive institutional change dynamics in two communication departments. International Journal of Strategic Communication10(4): 332–351.
25.
GrayBPurdyJMAnsariS (2015) From interactions to institutions: Microprocesses of framing and mechanisms for the structuring of institutional fields. Academy of Management Review40(1): 115–143.
26.
GreenwoodRHiningsCRWhettenD (2014) Rethinking institutions and organizations. Journal of Management Studies51(7): 1206–1220.
27.
GrunigJEHuntT (1984) Managing Public Relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
28.
HalffGGregoryA (2014) Toward an historically informed Asian model of public relations. Public Relations Review40: 397–407.
29.
HallahanK (1999) Seven models of framing: Implications for public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research11(3): 205–242.
30.
HallettTVentrescaMJ (2006) Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy. Theory and Society35: 213–236.
31.
HeathRL (ed.) (2009) The Rhetorical Tradition: Wrangle in the Marketplace. New York: Routledge.
32.
HeathRLMotionJLeitchJ (2010) Power and public relations: Paradoxes and programmatic thoughts. In: HeathRL (ed.) The Sage Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.155–175.
33.
HoltzhausenDR (2012) Public Relations as Activism: Postmodern Approaches to Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
34.
HouJZ (2016) The emerging ‘field’ of public relations in China: Multiple interplaying logics and evolving actors’ inter-relations. Public Relations Review42: 627–640.
35.
HuangYH (2001) OPRA: A cross-cultural, multiple-item scale for measuring organization-public relationships. Journal of Public Relations Research13: 61–90.
36.
IhlenØVerhoevenP (2009) Conclusions on the domain, context, concepts, issues, and empirical avenues of public relations. In: IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.323–340.
37.
InvernizziERomentiS (2009) Institutionalization and evaluation of corporate communication in Italian companies. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(2): 116–130.
38.
JoSHonLCBrunnerBR (2005) Organisation-public relationships: Measurement validation in a university setting. Journal of Communication Management9(1): 14–27.
39.
JohnstonKA (2014) Public relations and engagement: Theoretical imperatives of a multidimensional concept. Journal of Public Relations Research26(5): 381–383.
40.
KentML (2011) Public relations rhetoric: Criticism, dialogue, and the long now. Management Communication Quarterly25(3): 550–559.
41.
KiEJHonLC (2008) A measure of relationship cultivation strategies. Journal of Public Relations Research21(1): 1–24.
42.
KoeneBAS (2006) Situated human agency, institutional entrepreneurship and institutional change. Journal of Organizational Change Management19(3): 365–382.
43.
LammersJC (2011) How institutions communicate: Institutional messages, institutional logics, and organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly25(1): 154–182.
44.
LawrenceTBSuddabyR (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: CleggSRHardyCLaurenceTB (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp.215–254.
45.
LedinghamJA (2003) Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research15(2): 181–198.
46.
LedinghamJABruningSD (1998) Relationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship. Public Relations Review24(1): 55–65.
47.
L’EtangJXifraJCoombsT (2014) Knowledges, reflexivity and power. Public Relations Inquiry3(1): 3–6.
48.
LimJJonesL (2010) A baseline summary of framing research in public relations from 1999 to 2009. Public Relations Review36: 292–297.
49.
LundbergKGSataøenHL (2019) From translation of ideas to translocal relations: Shifting heuristics from Scandinavian Neo-Institutional Theory to institutional ethnography. In: LundRWBNilsenACE (eds) Institutional Ethnography in the Nordic Region (1st edition). London: Routledge, pp.39–50.
50.
MaguireSHardyCLawrenceTB (2004) Institutional Entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. The Academy of Management Journal47(5): 657–679.
51.
MartiIMairJ (2009) Bringing change into the lives of the poor: Entrepreneurship outside traditional boundaries. In: LawrenceTBSuddabyRLecaB (eds) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.92–119.
52.
MolleringGMuller-SeitzG (2018) Direction, not destination: Institutional work practices in the face of field-level uncertainty. European Management Journal36: 28–37.
53.
MotionJLeitchS (1996) A discursive perspective from New Zealand: Another worldview. Public Relations Review22(3): 297–309.
54.
MunirKA (2015) A loss of power in institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry24(1): 90–92.
55.
MuzioDBrockDMSuddabyR (2013) Professionals and organizational change: Towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. Journal of Management Studies50(5): 699–721.
56.
OcasioWLoewensteinJNigamA (2015) How streams of communication reproduce and change institutional logics: The role of categories. Academy of Management Review40(1): 28–48.
57.
RoperJ (2005) Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony?Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 69–86.
58.
SalomonsenHHAndersenLB (2014) Institutional change and professional norms: A study of grading behavior in higher education. International Journal of Public Administration37(10): 611–624.
59.
SandhuS (2009) Strategic communication: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication3: 72–92.
60.
SchildtHAMantereSVaaraE (2011) Reasonability and the linguistic division of labor in institutional work. Journal of Management Inquiry20(1): 82–86.
61.
SeoMGCreedWED (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review27(2): 222–247.
62.
SommerfeldtEJTaylorM (2011) A social capital approach to improving public relations’ efficacy: Diagnosing internal constraints on external communication. Public Relations Review37: 197–206.
63.
SuddabyR (2011) How communication institutionalises: A response to Lammers. Management Communication Quarterly25(1): 183–190.
64.
ThompsonG (2018) Help for heroes: From organizational discourse to a new orthodoxy. Public Relations Inquiry7(1): 25–43.
65.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (2008) Institutional logics. In: GreenwoodROliverCSuddabyR, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.99–129.
66.
VaaraESorsaVPalliP (2010) On the force potential of strategy texts: A critical discourse analysis of a strategic plan and its power effects in a city organization. Organization17(6): 685–702.
67.
VerčičDvan RulerBButschiG, et al. (2001) On the definition of public relations: A European view. Public Relations Review27: 373–387.
68.
VossenEvan GestelN (2019) Translating macro-ideas into micro-level practices: The role of social interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management35: 26–35.
69.
WæraasANielsenJA (2016) Translation theory ‘translated’: Three perspectives on translation in organizational research. International Journal of Management Reviews18: 236–270.
70.
WæraasASataoenHL (2014) Trapped in conformity? Translating reputation management into practice. Scandinavian Journal of Management30: 242–253.
71.
WakefieldRIPlowmanKDCurryA (2013) Institutionalizing public relations: An international multi-case study. Journal of Public Relations Research25: 207–224.
72.
WaldorffSB (2013) Accounting for organizational innovations: Mobilizing institutional logics in translation. Scandinavian Journal of Management29: 219–234.
73.
WedlinLSahlinK (2017) The imitation and translation of management ideas. In: GreenwoodROliverCLawrenceTB, et al. (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.102–127.
74.
WeikE (2011) Institutional entrepreneurship and agency. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour41(4): 465–481.
75.
WillmottH (2011) ‘Institutional work’ for what? Problems and prospects of institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry20(1): 67–72.
