Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2015-5
President of state in face of mortality: Exploring implications of Drnovšek’s radical shift on media,public relations and relationships between the two
The purpose of this article is to explore the influence a radical transformation of a politician facing mortality has on public relations, media and relationships between the two, focusing on the case of former Slovenian President Janez Drnovšek, who towards the end of his mandate transformed from a conventional, pragmatic politician to a New Age critical spiritual leader. Drawing on grounded theory approach, 12 qualitative interviews with journalists and Drnovšek’s political advisers were conducted. The results show that while the opinions and perceptions of Drnovšek’s change differed significantly between political advisers and journalists with the former neutralising it and the latter emphasising it, the methods of communication and relationships between them somewhat surprisingly remained the same, indicating their endurance and resistance to a radical political transformation in the process of public dying. What changed were Drnovšek himself and his ‘private’ style of communication with the media, and journalistic routines, resulting in amplified media coverage of an unconventional and ‘loopy’ President.
AndersonA (2003) Environmental activism and news media. In: CottleS (ed.) News, Public Relations and Power. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India: Sage, pp.117–132.
2.
BakaričD (2007) Jana Lutovac Lah, svetovalka predsednika republike Janeza Drnovška za odnose z javnostmi: ‘Predsedniku sem v oporo!’Obrazi12, 15June, pp. 34–36.
3.
BazeleyP (2007) Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles, CA; London; New Delhi, India; Singapore: Sage.
BerkowitzDLeeJ (2004) Media relations in Korea: Cheong between journalists and public relations practitioner. Public Relations Review30: 431–437.
6.
BerzelakM (2008) Politik z velikim Č. Jana, posebna izdaja Zbogom predsednikXXXVI, 25February, p.2.
7.
BognerAMenzW (2009) The theory-generating expert interview: Epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. In: BognerALittigBMenzW (eds) Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.43–80.
8.
BreckerE (1973) The Denial of Death. New York: The Free Press.
9.
BryantCD (2007) The sociology of death and dying. In: BryantCDPeckDL (eds) 21st Century Sociology. Thousand Oaks, CA; London; New Delhi, India: Sage, pp.56–166.
10.
ChristiansCG (2005) Ethics and politics in qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA; London; New Delhi, India: Sage, pp.139–164.
11.
CohenLLawrenceMMorrisonK (2011) Research Methods in Education. Oxon; New York: Routledge.
12.
CurtinPA (1999) Reevaluating public relations information subsidies: Market-driven journalism and agenda-building theory and practice. Journal of Public Relations Research11(1): 53–90.
13.
CutlipSMCenterAHBroomGM (2006) Effective Public Relations. London: Prentice Hall International.
14.
ČrničA (2007) Predsednik za novo dobo: Religiološka analiza Drnovškovega obrata. Družboslovne RazpraveXXIII(56): 21–37.
15.
DavisA (2010) Political Communication and Social Theory. Oxon; New York: Routledge.
EliasN (2001) The Loneliness of the Dying. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
18.
FroehlichRRüdigerB (2006) Framing political public relations: Measuring success of political communication strategies in Germany. Public Relations Review32: 18–25.
19.
FurmanN (2010) Communicating public money: Risks vs. opportunities. In: VerčičDSrirameshK (eds) Government Communication: Proceedings of the 17th International Public Relations Research Symposium BledCom. Ljubljana: Pristop, pp.124–131.
20.
GaltungJRugeMH (1965) The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research2(1): 64–91.
21.
Gibanje za pravičnost in razvoj (2006) Available at: http://www.gibanje.org (accessed 15 March 2014).
22.
GolobičG (2008) Pogrešali bomo izjemnega državnika. Jana, posebna izdaja Zbogom predsednikXXXVI, 25February, p.3.
23.
GrefeEACastlemanSA (2005) Information, communication systems, and technology in public affairs. In: HarrisPFleisherCS (eds) Handbook of Public Affairs. London: Sage, pp.160–186.
24.
HintonJ (1972) Dying. London: Penguin Books.
25.
JahansooziJ (2006) Relationships, transparency and evaluation: Implications for public relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.61–91.
26.
JeklinB (2008) Delali smo mu hudo krivico. Jana, posebna izdaja Zbogom predsednikXXXVI, 25February, p.6.
27.
Johnson-CarteeKS (2005) News Narratives and News Framing: Constructing Political Reality. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
28.
KearlMC (1989) Endings: A Sociology of Death and Dying. New York: Oxford University Press.
29.
KovačB (2008) Simbolni konec tranzicije. Mladina09, 29February, p.23.
30.
Kübler-RossE (2009) On Death and Dying: What the Dying Have to Teach Doctors, Nurses, Clergy and Their Own Families. Oxon: Routledge.
31.
LabanV (2007) Televizijsko novinarstvo: Hibridizacija žanrov in stilov. Ljubljana: FDV.
32.
LarssonL (2006) Public relations and democracy: A Swedish perspective. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.123–141.
33.
LewisJRitchieJ (2003) Generalizing from qualitative research. In: RitchieJLewisJ (eds) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.263–268.
34.
LittigB (2009) Interviewing the elite – Interviewing experts: Is there a difference? In: BognerALittigBMenzW (eds) Interviewing Experts. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave MacMillan, pp.98–113.
Malenšek KojićT (2007) Odnosi med strokovnjaki za odnose z javnostmi in novinarji. Master Thesis, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
37.
McGregorJ (2002) Restating news values: Contemporary criteria for selecting the news. In: Australia and New Zealand Communication Association International Conference: Communication – Reconstructed for the 21st Century, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 10–12 July.
38.
MladenovićS (2008) Analitiki: O Drnovškovem mandatu težko podati enovito oceno. Available at: http://www.sta.si/vest.php?s=s&id=1260583 (accessed 23 February 2008).
39.
NeijensPSmitE (2006) Dutch public relations practitioners and journalists: Antagonists no more. Public Relations Review32: 232–240.
40.
Poler KovačičM (2002) Vplivi odnosov z mediji na novinarski sporočanjski proces. Teorija in praksa39(5): 766–785.
RepovžG (2007) Intervju Janez Drnovšek: ‘Kar se dogaja, je zunaj okvirov normalnega’. Mladina07, 17February, pp.36–40.
44.
RijavecP (1998) Odnosi z mediji. In: GrubanBVerčičDZavrlF (eds) Preskok v odnose z javnostmi. Ljubljana: Pristop, pp.189–202.
45.
RossK (2010) Danse Macabre: Politicians, journalists, and the complicated Rumba of relationships. The International Journal of Press/Politics15(3): 272–294.
46.
SallotLMJohnsonEA (2006) Investigating relationships between journalists and public relations practitioners: Working together to set, frame and build the public agenda, 1991–2004. Public Relations Review32: 151–159.
47.
Serajnik SrakaNVidrihB (2001) Vladni odnosi z javnostmi: Model organiziranosti vladnih odnosov z javnostmi v Sloveniji. Teorija in praksa38(4): 650–674.
48.
Serajnik SrakaNKekMVidrihB (2010) Capacity building in government communication – The case of Slovenia: From capacity building to professionalism. In: VerčičDSrirameshK (eds) Government Communication: Proceedings of the 17th International Public Relations Research Symposium BledCom. Ljubljana: Pristop, pp.208–220.
49.
ShawTWhiteC (2004) Public relations and journalism educators’ perceptions of media relations. Public Relations Review30: 493–502.
50.
ShinJHCameronGT (2003) Informal relations: A look at personal influence in media relations. Journal of Communication Management7(3): 239–253.
51.
SilvermanD (2006) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analyzing Talk, Text and Interaction. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India: Sage.
52.
StraussACorbinJ (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures in Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA; London; New Delhi, India: Sage.
53.
TrampušJ (2006) Janez D. Mladina 52–53, 22December, pp.18–20.
54.
Van BrusselLCarpentierN (eds) (2014) The Social Construction of Death: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Basingstoke; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
55.
VastermanPLM (2005) Media-hype: Self-reinforcing news waves, journalistic standards and the construction of social problems. European Journal of Communication20(4): 508–530.
56.
VerčičD (2003) Public relations in a corporativisit country: The case of Slovenia. In: SrirameshKVerčičD (eds) The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 281–300.
57.
VerčičD (2004) Slovenia. In: Van RulerBVerčičD (eds) Public Relations and Communication Management in Europe: A Nation-by-Nation Introduction to Public Relations Theory and Practice. Berlin; New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp.375–386.
58.
VerčičD (2009) Public relations in a corporativisit country: The case of Slovenia. In: SrirameshKVerčičD (eds) The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research and Practice (Revised edition). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 573–595.
59.
VerčičDAžmanA (2002) Communication between government and citizens in Slovenia: A report & recommendations. In: United Nations development programme regional bureau for Eastern Europe and the CIS UNDP RBEC sub-regional project RER/01/003/A08/13: ‘Improving Communication from Government to Societies’. Ljubljana: 29June.
60.
VerčičDZavrlFRijavecP (2002) Odnosi z mediji. Ljubljana: GV Založba.
61.
VoltmerK (ed.) (2006) Mass Media and Political Communication in New Democracies. London; New York: Routledge/ECPR.
62.
VregF (2001) Volitve 2000 in predvolilna kampanja. Teorija in praksa38(2): 181–200.
63.
VregF (2004) Politični marketing in demokracija. Ljubljana: FDV.
