The article deals with the current status of public relations (PR) as a scientific discipline which is in the process of breaking up into several subdisciplinary fields of research. It gives an overview of the problematic aspects of the disciplinary developments of PR and crystallizes the main points of the debate. The author criticizes the constant broadening and fragmentation of the field, occupying terrain from neighboring disciplines, and the eclecticism with which PR adopts concepts and theories from other fields without providing substantial theory building of its own. PR is considered a ‘postdisciplinary’ field of research, and the author points toward both the positive and the negative aspects that are associated with this. The conclusion suggests different approaches how to address the status quo.
AbbottA (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AldooryL (2005) A (re)conceived feminist paradigm for public relations: A case for substantial improvement. Journal of Communication55(4): 668–684.
3.
BardhanNWeaverCK (2010) Public Relations in Global Cultural Contexts. London: Routledge.
4.
BergerBMengJ (2010) Public relations practitioners and the leadership challenge. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.421–434.
5.
BotanCHHazletonV (2006) Public relations in a new age. In: BotanCHHazletonV (eds) Public Relations Theory II. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.1–18.
6.
BotanCHTaylorM (2004) Public relations: State of the field. Journal of Communication54(4): 645–661.
7.
BrownRE (2010) Symmetry and its critics: Antecedents, prospects, and implications for symmetry in a post-symmetry era. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.277–292.
8.
BrownRE (2012) Epistemological modesty: Critical reflections on public relations thought. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 89–105.
9.
CaseS (2001) Feminism and performance: A post-disciplinary couple. Theatre Research International26(2): 145–152.
10.
CheneyGChristensenLT (2000) Public relations as contested terrain: A critical response. In: HeathRL (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.167–182.
11.
ChristensenLTCornelissenJP (2011) Bridging corporate and organizational communication: Review, development and a look to the future. Management Communication Quarterly25(3): 383–414.
12.
ChristensenLTMorsingMCheneyG (2008) Corporate Communications: Convention, Complexity, and Critique. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
13.
ColeS (1994) Why sociology doesn’t make progress like the natural sciences. Sociological Forum9(2): 133–154.
14.
CornelissenJ (2008) Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
15.
CraigRT (1999) Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory9(2): 119–161.
16.
CroppFPincusJD (2000) The mystery of public relations. Unraveling its past, unmasking its future. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.189–203.
17.
CurtinPA (2012) Public relations and philosophy: Parsing paradigms. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 31–47.
18.
DeetzSA (1994) Future of the discipline: The challenges, the research, and the social contribution. In: DeetzSA (ed.) Communication Yearbook 17. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.565–600.
19.
DühringL (2012) Concepts of scientific progress and their implications for the public relations discipline or ‘Knowledge for What?’Paper presented at the Annual EUPRERA Congress, Istanbul, September.
20.
EdwardsL (2010) ‘Race’ in public relations. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.205–222.
21.
EdwardsL (2012) Defining the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 7–30.
22.
EdwardsLHodgesCEM (2011) Public Relations, Society and Culture: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. London: Routledge.
23.
EhlingWP (1989) Public relations management and marketing management: Different paradigms and different missions. Paper presented to a challenge to the calling: Public relations colloquium 1989, San Diego, January 24.
24.
EngesethS (2009) Fall of PR and Rise of Advertising. Stockholm: Engeseth Publishing.
25.
GrunigJE (ed.) (1992) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26.
HallahanK (1993) The paradigm struggle and public relations practice (Special Issue: Public Relations Paradigm). Public Relations Review19(2): 197–205.
27.
HallahanKHoltzhausenDvan RulerB. (2007) Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication1(1): 3–35.
28.
HeathRL (2010) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
29.
HeathRLPalencharMJ (2009) Strategic Issues Management: Organizations and Public Policy Challenges, vol. 2. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30.
HerbstS (2008) Disciplines, intersections, and the future of communication research. Journal of Communication58(4): 603–614.
31.
HoltzhausenDRHallahanK (2007) Strategic directions for new journal. International Journal of Strategic Communication1(1): 1–2.
32.
HuttonJG (1996) Integrated marketing communications and the evolution of marketing thought. Journal of Business Research37(3): 155–162.
33.
HuttonJG (2010) Defining the relationship between public relations and marketing: Public relations’ most important challenge. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.509–522.
34.
IhlenØVan RulerB (2009) Introduction: Applying social theory to public relations. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.1–20.
35.
IhlenØVerhoevenP (2009) Conclusions on the domain, context, concepts, issues and empirical avenues of public relations. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.332–349.
36.
IhlenØVerhoevenP (2012) A public relations identity for the 2010s. Public Relations Inquiry1(2): 159–176.
37.
IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (2009) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge.
38.
JablinFMPutnamLL (2004) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research, and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
KitchenPJ (1997) Was public relations a prelude to corporate communications?Corporate Communications: An International Journal2(1): 22–30.
40.
KuhnTS (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edition). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
41.
LauzenMM (1991) Imperialism and encroachment in public relations. Public Relations Review17(3): 245–255.
42.
L’EtangJ (2008) Writing PR history: Issues, methods and politics. Journal of Communication Management12(4): 319–335.
43.
L’EtangJ (2010) ‘Making it Real’: Anthropological reflections on public relations, diplomacy, and rhetoric. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.145–162.
44.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) (1996) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. London: International Thomson Business Press.
45.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (2006) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46.
McDonaldLMHebbaniAG (2011) Back to the future: Is strategic management (re)emerging as public relations’ dominant paradigm?PRism8(1): 1–16.
47.
McKieD (2000) Updating public relations: ‘New science’, research paradigms, and uneven developments. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 1. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.75–91.
48.
McKieDMunshiD (2007) Reconfiguring Public Relations: Ecology, Equity and Enterprise. London: Routledge.
49.
MastermanM (1972) The nature of a paradigm. In: LakatosIMusgraveA (eds) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge (Reprint). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.59–90.
MenandL (2010) The Marketplace of Ideas (Kindle Edition). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
52.
MengJBergerBKGowerKK. (2012) A test of excellent leadership in public relations: Key qualities, valuable sources, and distinctive leadership perceptions. Journal of Public Relations Research24(1): 18–36.
53.
MickeyTJ (2003) Deconstructing Public Relations: Public Relations Criticism. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
54.
MoloneyK (1997) Teaching organizational communication as public relations in UK universities. Corporate Communications: An International Journal2(4): 138–142.
55.
MoloneyK (2006) Rethinking Public Relations: PR Propaganda and Democracy, vol. 2. London: Routledge.
56.
MotionJWeaverKC (2005) A discourse perspective for critical public relations research: Life sciences network and the battle for truth. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 49–67.
57.
NewtonT (2010) Knowledge and practice: Organization studies within a historical and figurational context. Organization Studies31(9–10): 1369–1395.
58.
NothhaftH (2011) Kommunikationsmanagement als professionelle Organisationspraxis: Theoretische Annäherung auf Grundlage einer teilnehmenden Beobachtungsstudie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
59.
PetersJD (1986) Institutional sources of intellectual poverty in communication research. Communication Research13(4): 527–559.
60.
PieczkaM (1996) Paradigms, systems theory and public relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (ed.) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. London: International Thomson Business Press, pp.124–156.
61.
RadfordGP (2012) Public relations in a postmodern world. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 49–67.
62.
RiesARiesL (2004) The fall of advertising and the rise of PR. New York: Harper Paperbacks.
63.
RuleJB (1997) Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
64.
SallotLMLyonLJAcosta-AlzuruC. (2003) From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research15(1): 27–90.
65.
ShawEHJonesDGB (2005) A history of schools of marketing thought. Marketing Theory5(3): 239–281.
66.
SiscoHFCollinsELZochLM (2011) Breadth or depth? A content analysis of the use of public relations theory. Public Relations Review37(2): 145–150.
67.
SmithRD (2005) Strategic Planning for Public Relations, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
68.
SrirameshK (2004) Epilogue: The need for multiculturalism in public relations education in Asia. In: SrirameshK (ed.) Public Relations in Asia: An Anthropology. Singapore: International Thomson Business Press, pp.321–341.
69.
SrirameshK (2007) The relationship between culture and public relations. In: TothEL (ed.) The Future of Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management: Challenges for the Next Generation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.507–526.
70.
SrirameshK (2010) Globalization and public relations. Opportunities for growth and reformulation. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.691–707.
71.
SrirameshKVerčičD (eds) (2012) Culture and Public Relations: Links and Implications. London: Routledge.
72.
SwansonDL (1993) Fragmentation, the field, and the future. Journal of Communication43(4): 163–173.
TironeJF (1979) Education, theory, and research in public relations. Public Relations Review5(1): 15–25.
75.
TothEL (2010) Reflections on the field. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.711–722.
76.
WatsonT (2010) Reputation models, drivers, and measurement. In: HeathRL (ed.) The SAGE Handbook of Public Relations, vol. 2. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp.339–352.
77.
WatsonTNobleP (2007) Evaluating Public Relations: A Best Practice Guide to Public Relations Planning, Research and Evaluation, vol. 2. London: Kogan Page Publishers.
78.
WatsonTZerfassA (2011) Return on investment in public relations: A critique of concepts used by practitioners from communication and management sciences perspectives. PRism8(1): 1–14.
79.
ZerfassA (2010) Assuring rationality and transparency in corporate communications: The role of communication controlling from a management point of view. Paper presented at the 13th international public relations research conference, Miami, FL, 10–13 March.
80.
ZerfassASherzadaM (2014) Corporate communication from the CEO’s perspective: How top executives conceptualize and value strategic communication. Paper presented at the 17th annual international public relations research conference, Miami, FL, March.
81.
ZerfassATenchRVerčičD. (2014) European Communication Monitor 2014. Excellence in Strategic Communication – Key Issues, Leadership, Gender and Mobile Media. Results of a Survey in 42 Countries. Brussels: European Association of Communication Directors (EACD); European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA), Helios Media.
82.
ZerfassAVerhoevenPMorenoÁ. (2011) European Communication Monitor 2011: Empirical Insights into Strategic Communication in Europe Results of an Empirical Survey in 43 Countries. Brussels: European Association of Communication Directors (EACD); European Public Relations Education and Research Association (EUPRERA).
