This article is the first to discuss the recent and significant reforms of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization’s (UNESCO) communications. I analyse the major measures such as bringing together communication and political workers in one sector, assembling all communicators and web services in one division and introducing monthly media reports. I examine issues such as opening the brand, clearance of press releases, use of languages, professionalisation, press agentry and the need to adopt a more conversational and multiple-voice approach. UNESCO’s communications reform has advanced only halfway in two respects. First, changes have not resulted in a comprehensive communication strategy. Despite refurbishing its web site and introducing various social media, the organisation is still using the one-sided model of public information. It is lacking the new media agents who can engage UNESCO’s diverse constituency in online sharing and networking. Second, the restructuring has partly empowered the communicators and made them more professional. The reform, however, is not accomplished. The functionalist, old-bureaucratic notion that communication is an organisational ‘silo’, and that changes should affect only those who are appointed to communicate, is redundant. For a full success, not only the communications of the organisation, but also the organisation that communicates needs to change.
BennettWL (2003) Communicating global activism: Strengths and vulnerability of networked politics. Information, Communication & Society6(2): 143–168.
2.
BergerBK (2005) Power over, power with, and power to relations: Critical reflections on public relations, the dominant coalition, and activism. Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 5–28.
3.
BergerPLLuckmannT (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Anchor Books.
BotanCHHazletonV (2006) Public Relations Theory II. London: Routledge.
6.
BroganCSmithJ (2009) Trust Agents: Using the Web to Build Influence, Improve Reputation, and Earn Trust. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
7.
CheneyGChristensenLTZornTEJr. (2004) Organizational Communication in an Age of Globalization: Issues, Reflections, Practices. Prospect Highs, IL: Waveland Press.
8.
ChildersEUrquhartB (1994) Renewing United Nations System. Uppsala: Dag Hammarsk Jöld Foundation.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2007) It’s Not Just PR: Public Relations in Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
12.
CorradoM (2002) The role of survey research in international campaigns: What can be learned from case studies. In: KlingemannH-DRoemmeleA (eds) Public Information Campaigns & Opinion Research. London: Sage, pp.125–146.
13.
CurtinPA (2012) Public relations and philosophy: Parsing paradigms. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 31–47.
14.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2007) International Public Relations: Negotiating Culture, Identity, and Power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
DavisA (2002) Public Relations Democracy: Public Relations, Politics and the Mass Media in Britain. Manchester; New York: Manchester University Press.
16.
DeetzS (2001) Conceptual foundations. In: JablinFMPutnamLL (eds) The New Handbook of Organizational Communication: Advances in Theory, Research and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.5–18.
17.
DefournyV (2003) Public information in the UNESCO: Toward a strategic role. In: SrirameshKVercicD (eds) The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York; London: Routledge, pp.958–974.
DimitrovR (2008b) ChilOut: Strategic communication by small advocacy groups. Australian Journal of Communication34(3): 129–143.
20.
DimitrovR (2008c) The strategic response: An introduction to nonprofit communications. Third Sector Review (Special Issue: Third Sector and Communication)14(2): 9–50.
21.
DimitrovR (2008d) Gender violence, fan activism and public relations in sport: The case of ‘Footy Fans Against Sexual Assault’. Public Relations Review34(2): 90–98.
22.
DuhéSC (ed.) (2007) New Media and Public Relations. New York: Peter Lang Publishing, Inc.
23.
EdwardsL (2012) Defining the ‘object’ of public relations research: A new starting point. Public Relations Inquiry1(1): 7–30.
24.
EdwardsLHodgesC (eds) (2011) Public Relations, Society and Culture: Theoretical and Empirical Explorations. London: Routledge.
25.
FarrR (1987) Social representations: A French tradition of research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour17(4): 343–365.
26.
FineAH (2006) Momentum: Igniting Social Change in the Connected Age. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) (2009) Headquarters organizational structure – Further progress report. CoC-IEE Working Groups I and III, 4June. Available at: http://www.fao.org/uploads/media/WG-4June-HQE_3.pdf (accessed 29 November 2011).
28.
GallowayCJ (2013) Deliver us from definitions: A fresh way of looking at public relations. Public Relations Inquiry2(2): 147–159.
29.
GeorgeALBennettA (2005) Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30.
GolbeckJGrimesJMRogersA (2010) Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology61(8): 1612–1621.
GraffyC (2009) The rise of public diplomacy 2.0. The Journal of International Security Affairs17.
33.
GranataF (2004) La communication interne: un état spontané ou une action organisée? Le cas de l’UNESCO. Paris: Université de Paris XII (Val de Marne).
34.
GreenbergJGrosenickG (2008) Building communicative capacity in the third sector: Research from Canada. Third Sector Review (Special Issue: Third Sector and Communication)14(2): 51–74.
35.
GrunigJE (2001) Two way symmetrical public relations: Past, present and future. In HeathR. L. (Ed.), Handbook of public relations, London: Sage, pp. 11–30.
36.
GubaEGLincolnYS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.191–215.
37.
GuthDMarshC (2004) Adventures in Public Relations: Case Studies and Critical Thinking. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
38.
HallahanKHoltzhausenDvan RulerB. (2007) Defining strategic communication. International Journal of Strategic Communication1(1): 3–35.
39.
HeathRL (2001) A rhetorical enactment rationale for public relations. In: HeathRL (ed.) The Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.35–56.
40.
HerndonSLKrepsGL (eds) (2001) Qualitative Research: Applications in Organizational Life. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
41.
HolidayR (2012) Trust Me, I’m Lying: The Tactics and Confessions of a Media Manipulator. London: Penguin Books.
KrippendorffK (1994) A recursive theory of communication. In: CrowleyDMitchellD (eds) Communication Theory Today. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp.78–104.
46.
KrippendorffK (2004) Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
L’EtangJ (2005) Critical public relations: Some reflections. Public Relations Review31: 521–526.
49.
L’EtangJ (2007) Public relations as diplomacy. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. Boston, MA: International Thomson Business Press, pp.14–34.
50.
L’EtangJ (2008) Public Relations: Concepts, Practice and Critique. London: Sage.
51.
L’EtangJ (2009) Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication. American Behavioral Scientist53(4): 607–626.
52.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (1996) Critical Perspectives in Public Relations. London: International Thomson Business Press.
53.
LowJBloisK (2002) The evolution of generic brands in industrial markets: The challenges to owners of brand equity. Industrial Marketing Management31(5): 385–392.
PerelmanCKlubackWArnoldCC (1982) The Realm of Rhetoric. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
57.
PhillinganeED (2005) Press agentry. In: HeathRL (ed.) Encyclopedia of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.639–640.
58.
PicktonDBroderickA (2001) Integrated Marketing Communication. New York: Pearson Education.
59.
PieczkaML’EtangJ (2006) Public relations and the question of professionalism. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.265–278.
60.
PolkinghorneDE (1989) Phenomenological research methods. In: ValleRSHallingS (eds) Existential-Phenomenological Perspectives in Psychology, Plenum Press, New York, pp.41–60.
61.
RossC (2002) Public diplomacy comes of age. The Washington Quarterly25(2): 75–83.
62.
SchlesingerP (1990) Rethinking the sociology of journalism: Source strategies and the limits of media-centrism. In: FergusonM (ed.) Public Communication: The New Imperatives. London: Sage, pp.61–83.
63.
ShirkyC (2008) Here Comes Everyone: The Power of Organizing without organizations. New York: The Penguin Press.
64.
SnowC (2006) Public diplomacy practitioners: A changing cast of characters. Journal of Business Strategy27(3): 18–21.
65.
SparrowNTurnerJ (2001) The permanent campaign. The integration of market research techniques in developing strategies in a more uncertain political climate. European Journal of Marketing35(9–10): 984–1002.
66.
SrirameshKVercicD (2003) The relationship between culture and public relations. In: SrirameshKVercicD (eds) The Global Public Relations Handbook: Theory, Research, and Practice. New York: Routledge, pp.52–67.
67.
SunWStewartJPollardD (eds) (2011) Corporate Governance and the Global Financial Crisis: International Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
UNESCO (2010) A program of action and vision to enhance UNESCO’s visibility. Unpublished document.
72.
UNESCO (2011a) Sector for External Relations and Public Information, Division of Public Information: Monthly report on the use of UNESCO public information products. February 2011. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001916/191636E.pdf (accessed 5 January 2012).
73.
UNESCO (2011b) Sector for External Relations and Public Information, Division of Public Information: Monthly report on the use of UNESCO public information products. June 2011. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001937/193700e.pdf (accessed 3 January 2012).
74.
UNESCO (2011c) Sector for External Relations and Public Information, Division of Public Information: Monthly report on the use of UNESCO public information products. October 2011. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002142/214299e.pdf (accessed 5 January 2012).
75.
UNESCO (2011d) The Director-General: Restructuring of the Sector for External Relations and Public Information (ERI), DG/Note/11/1. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001907/190742e.pdf (accessed 14 October 2011).
76.
UNESCO (2012a) Executive Board: 190 EX/21, Part II, Follow-up to the independent external evaluation of UNESCO, Part II, Policy framework for strategic partnerships: A comprehensive partnership strategy. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002173/217301E.pdf (accessed 25 October 2013).
UNESCO (2013) Sector for External Relations and Public Information: Monthly report on the use of UNESCO public information products. June 2013. Available at: http://unesdoc.une-sco.org/images/0022/002217/221796e.pdf (accessed 24 October 2013).
80.
United Nations (ed.) (2010) The Millennium Development Goals Report. United Nations, New York. Available at: http://www.un.cv/files/MDGReport.pdf
81.
Van RulerBVercicDBütschiG. (2004) A first look for parameters of public relations in Europe. Journal of Public Relations Research16(1): 1–34.
