The overall objective of this study is to examine how the institutional context of food safety affects and is affected by concerns for legitimacy and reputation. The paper employs a neo-institutional approach to analyzing the institutional field of food safety in a case study of a multinational food service provider where a tension between conflicting institutional logics implied a reputational challenge. The study shows how food safety as a well-defined operational risk is transformed into a high-priority reputational risk and how actors in the field of food safety are caught in a state of mutual distrust, partly as a consequence of an intense politicization of food risk over the past years and partly as a result of their respective concerns for legitimacy. The study points to how the field of food safety is colonized by a reputational logic that is paradoxically reproduced by actors at all organizational levels even though they strongly oppose to this logic.
BattilanaJ (2006) Agency and institutions: The enabling role of individuals’ social position. Organization13(5): 653–676.
2.
BenoitWL (1997) Image repair discourse and crisis communication. Public Relations Review23(2): 177–186.
3.
BerelsonB (1971[1952]) Content Analysis in Communication Research. New York, NY: Haffner.
4.
BinderA (2007) For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society36(6): 547–571.
5.
BorgattiSPMehraABrassDLabiancaG (2009) Network analysis in the social sciences. Science323(5916): 892–895.
6.
BourdieuP (1971) Intellectual field and creative project. In: YoungMFD (ed.) Knowledge and Control: New Directions for the Sociology of Education. London: Collier–Macmillan, pp.161–188 (reprinted from Social Science Information 8(2): 89–119.
7.
BourdieuP (1998) On Television. New York, NY: The Free Press.
8.
BoxenbaumEJonssonS (2008) Isomophism, diffusion and decoupling. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.78–98.
9.
BoydJ (2000) Actional legitimation: No crisis necessary. Journal of Public Relations Research12: 341–353.
10.
BrunssonN (2003) Organized hypocrisy. In: CzarniawskaBSevónG (eds) Northern lights: Organization Theory in Scandinavia. Oslo: Abstrakt Liber Copenhagen Business Press, pp.201–122.
11.
CatinoMA (2008) Review of literature: Individual blame versus organizational function logics in accident analysis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management16(1): 53–62.
12.
CheneyGChristensenLT (2006) What should public relations theory do, practically speaking?Journal of Communication Management10(1): 100–102.
13.
ChristensenLTLangerR (2009) Public relations and the strategic use of transparency: Consistency, hypocrisy, and corporate change. In: HeathRLTothELWaymerD (eds) Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.129–153.
14.
CoombsWT (2006) The protective powers of crisis response strategies: Managing reputational assets during a crisis. Journal of Promotion Management12: 241–259.
15.
CoombsWT (2007) Protecting organization reputations during a crisis: The development and application of situational crisis communication theory. Corporate Reputation Review10: 163–176.
16.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2002) Helping crisis managers protect reputational assets: Initial tests of the situational crisis communication theory. Management Communication Quarterly16: 165–186.
17.
CoombsWTHolladaySJ (2012) Fringe public relations: How activism moves critical PR toward the mainstream. Public Relations Review. Epub ahead of print 15 October 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2012.02.008.
CzarniawskaB (2008) How to misuse institutions and get away with it: Some reflections on institutional theory(ies). In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.769–782.
20.
DavisGFDiekmannKTinsleyCH (1994) The decline and fall of the conglomerate firm in the 1980s: The deinstitutionalization of an organizational form. American Sociological Review59(4): 547–570.
21.
DaymondCHollowayI (2011) Qualitative Research Methods in Public Relations and Marketing Communications (2nd edition). New York, NY: Routledge.
22.
DeephouseDLCarterSM (2005) An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies42(2): 329–360.
23.
DeephouseDLSuchmanM (2008) Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.49–77.
24.
DezalayYSugarmanD (eds) (1995) Professional Competition and Professional Power: Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets. London: Routledge.
25.
DiMaggioPJ (1983) State expansion and organization fields. In: HallRHQuinnRE (eds) Organization Theory and Public Policy. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp.147–161.
26.
DiMaggioPJ (1991) Constructing an organizational field as a professional project: US art museums. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds)The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.1920–1940.
27.
DiMaggioPJPowellWW (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review48: 147–160.
28.
DobbinFDowdTJ (2000) The market that antitrust built: Public policy, private coercion and railroad acquisition. American Sociological Review65: 631–647.
29.
DozierDMLauzenMM (2000) Liberating the intellectual domain from the practice: Public relations, activism, and the role of the scholar. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 3–22.
30.
DozierDMGrunigLAGrunigJE (1995) Manager’s Guide to Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31.
EdwardsL (2006) Rethinking power in public relations. Public Relations Review32: 229–231.
32.
FergusonMAT (1984) Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, August, Gainesville, FL.
33.
FombrunCJ (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
FombrunCVan RielC (1997) The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review1: 5–13.
35.
FrandsenFJohansenW (2009) Institutionalizing crisis communication in the public sector: An explorative study in Danish municipalities. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(2): 102–115.
36.
GiddensA (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
37.
GrandienCJohanssonC (2012) Institutionalization of communication management: A theoretical framework. Corporate Communications: An International Journal17(2): 209–227.
38.
GregoryA (2012) Reviewing public relations research and scholarship in the 21st century. Public relations Review38(1): 1–4.
39.
GreenwoodRSuddabyR (2006) Institutional entrepreneurship in mature fields; The Big Five accounting firms. Academy of Management Journal49(1): 27–48.
40.
GrunigJE (1992) Communication, public relations and effective organization. In: GrunigJE (ed.) Excellence in Public Relations and Communication Management. Hallsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp.1–30.
41.
HabermasJ (1989) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into the Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
HallettTVentrescaMJ (2006) Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s patterns of industrial bureaucracy. Theory and Society35(2): 213–236.
43.
HallettTShulmanDFineGA (2010) Peopling organizations: The promise of classic symbolic interactionism for an inhabited institutionalism. In: AdlerPS (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Sociology and Organization Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.486–509.
44.
HarlowRF (1977) Public relations definitions through the years. Public Relations Review3: 49–63.
45.
HatchMJSchultzM (2001) Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand?Harvard Business Review79(2): 128–134.
46.
HolmströmS (2005) Reframing public relations: The evolution of a reflective paradigm for organizational legitimization. Public Relations Review31: 497–504.
47.
HoltzhausenDR (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 93–114.
HuttonJGGoodmanMBAlexanderJBGenestCM (2001) Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations?Public Relations review27(3): 247–261.
50.
IhlenØVan RulerB (2007) How public relations works: Theoretical roots and public relations perspectives. Public Relations Review33: 243–248.
51.
IhlenØVan RulerB (2009) Introduction: Applying social theory to public relations. In: IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, pp.1–20.
52.
IhlenØVan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) (2009) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge.
53.
IhlenØVerhoevenP (2012) A public relations identity for the 2010s. Public Relations Inquiry1(2): 159–176.
54.
JanhansooziJ (2006) Relationships, transparency, and evaluation: The implications for public Relations. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.61–91.
55.
JeppersonRL (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalization. In: PowellWWDiMaggioPJ (eds) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp.143–163.
56.
KellerK LAakerDA (1998) Corporate-level marketing: The impact of credibility on a company’s brand extensions. Corporate Reputation Review1: 356–378.
57.
KrippendorffK (2012) Content analysis. An Introduction to its Methodology (3rd edition). London: Sage.
58.
KruckebergD (1993) Universal ethics code: Both possible and feasible. Public Relations Review19(1): 21–31.
59.
L’EtangJ (2003) The myth of the ‘ethical guardian’: An examination of its origins, potency and illusions. Journal of Communication Management8(1): 53–67.
60.
L’EtangJ (2006) Public relations and propaganda: Conceptual issues, methodological problems, and public relations discourse. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.23–40.
61.
L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) (2006) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
62.
LammersJCBarbourJB (2006) An institutional theory of organizational communication. Communication Theory16: 356–377.
63.
LawrenceTBSuddabyR (2006) Institutions and institutional work. In: CleggSHardyCLawrenceTNordWR (eds) Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage, pp.215–54.
64.
LawrenceTBSuddabyRLecaB (eds) (2009) Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
LedinghamJA (2003) Explicating relationships management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research15(2):181–198.
66.
LeitchSNeilsonD (2001) Reframing public relations: New directions for theory and practice. Australian Journal of Communication24(2): 17–32.
67.
LöfstedtRE (2005) Risk management in Post-trust Societies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
68.
LuhmannN (1993) Risk: A Sociological Theory. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
69.
MarchandR (1998) Creating the Corporate Soul: The Rise of Public Relations and Corporate Imagery in American Big Business. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
70.
MarinAWellmanB (2011) Social network analysis: An introduction. In: ScottJCarringtonPJ (eds) The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage, pp.11–25.
71.
McCombsMEShawDL (1993) The evolution of agenda-setting research: Twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. Journal of Communication43(2): 58–67.
72.
McKieD (2001) Updating public relations: ‘New science’, research paradigms, and uneven developments. In: HeathR (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.75–91.
73.
MerkelsenH (2011a) The double-edged sword of legitimacy in public relations. Journal of Communication Management15(2): 125–143.
74.
MerkelsenH (2011b) Institutionalized ignorance as a precondition for rational risk expertise. Risk Analysis31(7): 1083–1094.
75.
MerkelsenH (2011c) Risk communication and citizen engagement: What to expect from dialogue. Journal of Risk Research14(5): 631–645.
76.
MetzlerMS (2001) The centrality of organizational legitimacy to public relations practice. In: HeathRL (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp.321–334.
77.
MeyerJWRowanB (1977) Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology83: 340–363.
78.
MeyerJWScottWRColeSIntiliJ-AK (1978) Instructional dissensus and institutional consensus in schools. In MeyerMW (ed.) Environments and Organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp.233–263.
79.
MickeyTJ (1997) A postmodern view of public relations: Sign and reality. Public Relations Review23(3): 271–284.
80.
MillerDDinanW (2008) A Century of Spin: How Public Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power. London: Pluto Press.
81.
OlaskyMN (1989) The aborted debate within public relations: An approach through Kuhn’s Paradigm. In: GrunigJEGrunigLA (eds) Public relations research annual. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.87–96.
82.
Owen-SmithJPowellWW (2008) Networks and institutions. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.596–624.
83.
PatelAMXavierRJBroomG (2005) Toward a model of organizational legitimacy in public relations theory and practice. In: International Communication Association Conference, 26–30 May 2005, New York, USA, pp.1–22. Available at: eprints.qut.edu.au/10132/1/10132.pdf (accessed 15 October 2012).
84.
PieczkaM (2008) Professionalization of public relations. In: DonsbachW (ed.) The International Encyclopedia of Communication, Vol. 9. Oxford: Wiley, pp.3912–3914.
85.
PieczkaML’EtangJ (2006) Public relations and the question of professionalism. In: L’EtangJPieczkaM (eds) Public Relations: Critical Debates and Contemporary Practices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.265–278.
86.
PowellWW (1988) Institutional effects on organizational structure and performance. In: ZuckerLG (ed.) Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger, pp.115–136.
87.
PowerM (1997) The Audit Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
88.
PowerM (2004) The Risk Management of Everything: Rethinking the Politics of Uncertainty. London: Demos.
89.
PowerM (2007) Organized Uncertainty: Designing a World of Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
90.
PowerMScheyttTSoinKSahlinK (2009) Reputational risk as a logic of organizing in late modernity. Organization Studies30(2/3): 301–324.
91.
Ritzau. (2006) Barfoed: Ingen garanti mod gammelt kød. Ritzaus Bureau, 26October, article ID 94d7.
92.
RoperJ (2005) Symmetrical communication: Excellent public relations or a strategy for hegemony?Journal of Public Relations Research17(1): 69–86.
93.
RothsteinHHuberMGaskellG (2006) A theory of risk colonization: The spiralling regulatory logics of societal and institutional risk. Economy and Society35(1): 91–112.
94.
SandhuS (2009) Strategic communication: An institutional perspective. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(2): 72–92.
ScottWR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
97.
ScottWR (2005) Institutional theory: Contributing to a theoretical research program. In: SmithKGHittMA (eds) Great Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.460–484.
98.
ScottWR (2008a) Approaching adulthood: The maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society37: 427–442
99.
ScottWR (2008b) Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
100.
ScottWRRuefMMendelPCaronnaC (2000) Institutional Change and Health Care Organizations: From Professional Dominance to Managed Care. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
101.
SeoMDouglas CreedWE (2002) Institutional contradictions, praxis and institutional change: A dialectical perspective. Academy of Management Review27(2): 222–247.
102.
StauberJRamptonS (1995) Toxic Sludge Is Good for You: Lies, Damn Lies and the Public Relations Industry. Monroe, ME: Common Courage Press.
103.
SuchmanMC (1995) Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Journal20(3): 571–610.
104.
TenchRVerhoevenPZerfassA (2009) Institutionalizing strategic communication in Europe – An ideal home or a mad house? Evidence from a survey in 37 countries. International Journal of Strategic Communication3(2): 147–164.
105.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (1999) Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology105(3): 801–843.
106.
ThorntonPHOcasioW (2008) Institutional logics. In: GreenwoodROliverCSahlinKSuddabyR (eds) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp.99–129.
107.
TothEL (2002) Postmodernism for modernist public relations: The cash value and application of critical research in public relations. Public Relations Review28(3): 243–250.
108.
Van de VenAH (2007) Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
109.
Van RielCBMBalmerJMT (1997) Corporate identity: The concept, its measurement and management. European Journal of Marketing31(5): 340–355.
110.
Van RulerBVercicD (2005) Reflective communication management: Future ways for public relations research. In: KalbfleischPJ (ed.) Communication Yearbook. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp.239–274.
111.
VasquezGMTaylorM (2000) Public relations: An emerging social science enters the New Millennium. In: GudykunstWB (ed.) Communication Yearbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.319–342.
112.
WakefieldRI (2008) Institutionalizing public relations: Progress or pipe dream? In: YamamuraK (ed.) 11th International Public Relations Research Conference, Miami, FL, 6–9 March, pp.667–779. Available at: iprrc.org/docs/IPRRC_11_Proceedings.pdf (accessed 15 October 2012).
113.
WæraasA (2009) On Weber: legitimacy and legitimation in public relations. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFrederikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory. Key Figures and Concepts. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.301–321.
114.
WeberM (1924) Towards a sociology of the press: An early proposal for content analysis. In: KrippendorffKBockMA (2009) The Content Analysis Reader. London: Sage, pp.9–11.
