This philosophical article examines how public relations researchers have engaged with Kuhn’s concept of a paradigm and have used it to set a research agenda for the field. I argue that Kuhn believed the social sciences to be inherently multi-paradigmatic, making the quest for a single, overarching paradigm for public relations research misguided. Instead, I lay out a four-paradigm schematic for the field, examining issues of semantic and cultural incommensurability and consequences for language use and research method and values. The article questions the definition of a mature discipline as often found in public relations literature and proposes that we might be more mature than we think if we are willing to accept a diversity of perspectives and their concomitant research values.
AldooryL (2005) A (re)conceived feminist paradigm for public relations: A case for substantial improvement. Journal of Communication55(4): 668–84.
2.
BardhanN (2003) Rupturing public relations metanarratives: The example of India. Journal of Public Relations Research15(3): 225–48.
3.
BardhanNPatwardhanP (2004) Multinational corporations and public relations in a historically resistant host culture. Journal of Communication Management8(3), 246–63.
4.
BardhanNWeaverCK (2011) Introduction: Public relations in global cultural contexts. In: BardhanNWeaverCK (eds) Public Relations in Global Cultural Contexts: Multiparadigmatic Perspectives. New York: Routledge, 1–28.
BechtelWHerschbachM (2010) Philosophy of the cognitive sciences. In: AllhoffF. (ed.) Philosophies of the Sciences. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 239–61.
7.
BernaysEL (1928) Propaganda. New York: Liveright Publishing.
8.
BinehamJL (1994) Displacing Descartes: Philosophical hermeneutics and rhetorical studies. Philosophy and Rhetoric27(4): 300–12.
BlumerH (1969) Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
11.
BohmanJFHileyDRShustermanR (1991) The interpretive turn. In: HileyDRBohmanJFShustermanR (eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–14.
12.
BotanCHazletonV (2006) Public relations in a new age. New York: Erlbaum, 1–17.
13.
BurgerM (2009) Business’s social involvement through public relations: A critical comparison of market-oriented and reflective paradigms of public relations. Communicatio35(1): 101–18.
14.
CareyJ (1989) Communication as culture. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
15.
ChungJHoM (2009) Public relations, I-Ching, and Chi (Qi/Ki): Theory and a new model from an old philosophy. China Media Research5(3): 94–101.
CurtinPAGaitherTK (2005) Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations practice. Journal of Public Relations Research17(2): 91–115.
18.
DeetzS (1978) Conceptualizing human understanding: Gadamer’s hermeneutics and American communication studies. Communication Quarterly26: 12–23.
19.
DerridaJ (1988) Afterword: Toward an ethic of discussion. In:Limited, Inc.Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 111–60.
20.
DescartesR (1999[1637]) Discourse on Method and Related Writings (trans. ClarkeDM). New York: Penguin Putnam.
21.
DreyfusHL (1980) Holism and hermeneutics. The Review of Metaphysics34(1): 3–23.
22.
DurkheimE (1972) Selected Writings (ed. and trans. GiddensA). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
DuttaMJ (2009) On Spivak: Theorizing resistance – applying Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak in public relations. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, 278–99.
24.
EdwardsL (2006) Rethinking power in public relations. Public Relations Review32: 229–31.
25.
EpsteinE (1973) News from Nowhere: Television and the News. New York: Random House.
26.
FalkheimerJHeideM (2006) Multicultural crisis communication: Towards a social constructivist perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management14(4): 180–9.
27.
FergusonMA (1984) Building theory in public relations: Interorganizational relationships as a public relations paradigm. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, August, Gainesville, FL.
28.
FeyerabendP (1999) Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers, Volume 3 (ed. PrestonJ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29.
FoucaultM (1978[1975]) The History of Sexuality: Vol. 1. An Introduction (trans. HurleyR). New York: Vintage Books.
30.
GansH (1979) Deciding What’s News. New York: Pantheon.
31.
GarciaC (2010) Integrating management practices in international public relations courses: A proposal of contents. Public Relations Review36(3): 272–7.
32.
GeertzG (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York: Basic Books.
33.
GibsonDGonzalesJL (2006/07) Elegant understatement: A new paradigm for public relations practice. Public Relations Quarterly51(4): 12–16.
34.
GilpinDRMurphyPJ (2008) Crisis Management in a Complex World. New York: Oxford University Press.
35.
GoffmanE (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday.
36.
GordonJC (1997) Interpreting definitions of public relations: Self assessment and a symbolic interactionist based alternative. Public Relations Review23(1): 57–66.
37.
GowerKK (2006) Public relations research at the crossroads. Journal of Public Relations Research18(2): 177–90.
38.
GubaEGLincolnYS (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 105–17.
39.
GubaEGLincolnYS (2005) Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of qualitative research (3rd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 191–215.
40.
HackettEJ (2005) Essential tensions: Identity, control, and risk in research. Social Studies of Science35(5): 787–826.
41.
HallS (1982) The re-discovery of ‘ideology’: Return of the repressed in media studies. In: GuerevitchMBennettTCurranJWoollacottJ (eds) Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen, 56–90.
42.
HallahanK (1993) The paradigm struggle and public relations practice. Public Relations Review19(2): 197–205.
43.
HarlowRF (1976) Building a public relations definition. Public Relations Review2(4): 34–42.
44.
HeisenbergW (1958) Physics and Philosophy. New York: Harper.
45.
HofstedeG (2001) Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46.
HoltzhausenDR (2000) Postmodern values in public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research12: 93–114.
47.
HoltzhausenDR (2002) Towards a postmodern research agenda for public relations. Public Relations Review28: 251–64.
48.
JohanssonC (2009) On Goffman: Researching relations with Erving Goffman as pathfinder. In: IhlenØvan RulerBFredrikssonM (eds) Public Relations and Social Theory: Key Figures and Concepts. New York: Routledge, 118–40.
49.
KincheloeJL (2004) Introduction: The power of the bricolage: Expanding research methods. In: KincheloeJLBerryKS (eds) Rigour and Complexity in Education Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press, 1–22.
50.
KlapperJT (1960) The Effects of Mass Communication. New York: Free Press.
51.
KuhnTS (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
52.
KuhnTS (1976) Theory-change as structure-change: Comments on the Sneed formalism. Erkenntnis10: 179–99.
53.
KuhnTS (1991) The natural and the human sciences. In: HileyDRBohmanJFShustermanR (eds) The Interpretive Turn: Philosophy, Science, Culture. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 17–24.
54.
KuhnTS (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
LaplacePS (1809) System of the World, 2 volumes (trans. PondJ). London: Richard Phillips.
56.
LaudanL (1981) A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science48(1): 19–49.
57.
ŁawniczakR (2009) Re-examining the economic roots of public relations. Public Relations Review35: 346–52.
58.
L’EtangJ (2005) Critical public relations: Some reflections. Public Relations Review31: 521–6.
59.
L’EtangJ (in press) Public relations anthropology. Journal of Public Relations Research.
60.
LittleD (2010) Philosophy of sociology. In: AllhoffF (ed.) Philosophies of the Sciences: A Guide. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 293–323.
61.
LyotardJF (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
62.
MarkhamANBaymNK (2009) Internet Inquiry: Conversations about Method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63.
MarshC (2008) Postmodernism, symmetry, and cash value: An Isocratean model for practitioners. Public Relations Review34(3): 237–43.
64.
MartinJNNakayamaTK (1999) Thinking dialectically about culture and communication. Communication Theory9(1): 1–25.
65.
MartinezJ (2006) Emerging cultural paradigm in public relations: Strategies for social change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, May, San Francisco, CA.
66.
MastermanM (1970) The nature of a paradigm. In: LakatosIMusgraveA (eds) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 59–89.
67.
McKelveyB (1999) Toward a Campbellian realist organization science. In: BaumJACMcKelveyB (eds) Variations in Organization Science. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 383–411.
68.
McKieD (2000) Updating public relations: ‘New science’, research paradigms, and uneven developments. In: HeathR (ed.) Handbook of Public Relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 75–91.
69.
MeadGH (1934) Mind, self, and society: From the perspective of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
70.
MickeyTJ (1997) A postmodern view of public relations: Sign and reality. Public Relations Review23: 271–84.
71.
MillerGR (1983) Taking stock of a discipline. Journal of Communication33(3): 31–41.
72.
MunshiD (2005) Imperializing spin cycles: A post-colonial look at public relations, greenwashing, and the separation of publics. Public Relations Review31(4): 513–20.
73.
MurphyP (1996) Chaos theory as a model for managing issues and crises. Public Relations Review22(2): 95–113.
74.
NastasiaDIRakowLF (2004) Towards a philosophy of communication theories: An ontological, epistemological and ideological approach. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
75.
NicklesT (2003) Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.
76.
PalMDuttaMJ (2008) Public relations in a global context: The relevance of critical modernism as a theoretical lens. Journal of Public Relations Research20: 159–79.
77.
PeirceCS (1991) Peirce on Signs: Writings on Semiotic (HoopesJ. ed.) Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
78.
PetersJD (1993) Genealogical notes on ‘The Field’. Journal of Communication43(4): 132–9.
79.
PompperD (2005) ‘Difference’ in public relations research: A case for introducing critical race theory. Journal of Public Relations Research17(2): 139–69.
80.
PompperD (2007) The gender-ethnicity construct in public relations organizations: Using feminist standpoint theory to discover Latinas’ realities. Howard Journal of Communication18(4): 291–311.
81.
PopperK (1968) The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
82.
RakowL (2005) A generative grammar of communication theories. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.
83.
RichterUH (2010) Liberal thought in reasoning on CSR. Journal of Business Ethics97: 625–49.
SallotLSLyonLJAcosta-AlzuruCJonesKO (2003) From aardvark to zebra: A new millennium analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals. Journal of Public Relations Research15(1): 27–90.
86.
SallotLSLyonLJAcosta-AlzuruCJonesKO (2007) From aardvark to zebra redux: An analysis of theory development in public relations academic journals into the twenty-first century. In: Hansen-HornTLNeffBD (eds) Public Relations: From Theory to Practice. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 343–78.
87.
SaussureF de (2006) Writings in General Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press.
88.
SpicerCH (2000) Public relations in a democratic society: Value and values. Journal of Public Relations Research12(1): 115–30.
89.
SteynB (2004) A metaphorical application of the concept ‘paradigm’ to the public relations domain. Communicare23(1): 54–78.
90.
SuppeFR (1972) What’s wrong with the received view on the structure of scientific theories. Philosophy of Science, 39: 1–19.
91.
SuppeF (1977) The Structure of Scientific Theories (2nd edition). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
92.
TuchmanG (1978) Making News: A Study in the Construction of Reality. New York: Free Press.
93.
Van SlykeJS (1980) Defining public relations: Toward a theory of science. Paper presented at the meeting of the Association for Education in Journalism, August, Boston, MA.
94.
WeaverCK (2001) Dressing for battle in the new global economy: Putting power, identity, and discourse into public relations theory. Management Communication Quarterly15(2): 279–88.
95.
WhiteheadAN (1967) Science and the Modern World. New York: The Free Press.
96.
ZochLMFussellHCollinsEL (2006) And all that is old is new again. In DiStasoMW (ed.) Proceedings of the 10th Annual International Public Relations Research Conference: Roles and scopes of public relations. Gainesville, FL: Institute for Public Relations, 658–65. Available at: www.instituteforpr.org/wp-content/uploads/IPRRC10_Proceedings.pdf.
