Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Eating disorders and obesity adversely affect individuals both medically and psychologically, leading to reduced life expectancy and poor quality of life. While there exist a number of treatments for anorexia, morbid obesity and bulimia, many patients do not respond favorably to current behavioral, medical or bariatric surgical management. Neuromodulation has been postulated as a potential treatment for eating disorders and obesity. In particular, deep brain stimulation and transcranial non-invasive brain stimulation have been studied for these indications across a variety of brain targets. Here, we review the neurobiology behind eating and eating disorders as well as the current status of preclinical and clinical neuromodulation trials for eating disorders and obesity.

Keywords

anorexia nervosa bulimia deep brain stimulation eating disorders non-invasive brain stimulation obesity transcranial direct current stimulation transcranial magnetic stimulation

Introduction

Eating disorders and obesity are characterized by abnormal and detrimental eating habits, and often result in significant medical and psychiatric comorbidities. They are associated with reduced quality of life and life expectancy.^1–3 In many ways, morbid obesity and anorexia nervosa (AN) represent extremes on two ends of the eating spectrum. Morbid obesity is defined as a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m² (or greater than 35 kg/m² in the presence of a significant obesity-related comorbid condition), while AN is defined by an extremely low BMI (<18.5 kg/m²) and concomitant anxiety and preoccupations related to weight and body image. Both diseases exert a significant individual and societal impact, albeit in different ways. Morbid obesity is a chronic, progressive disease with a prevalence of approximately 14%, and associations with comorbidities including cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, osteoarthritis and various cancers.^4,5 By contrast, only 0.7–3% of the population (with a 10:1 predominance in the female population) suffers from AN, but this disease is also associated with critical metabolic, endocrine and electrolyte imbalances, psychiatric comorbidities and an even higher risk of mortality due to suicide or medical complications (5–15% mortality rate).^6–9 Bulimia nervosa (BN), a similar but distinct eating disorder characterized by recurrent episodes of binge-eating and inappropriate compensatory behaviors, is estimated to have an overall prevalence of 0.3% and may afflict as many as 1% of young women.^10,11 It too is often functionally debilitating and accompanied by psychiatric comorbidities and linked to increased mortality.¹²

There is a need for additional treatment modalities in both obesity and eating disorders. Current treatments for obesity vary in efficacy and invasiveness, ranging from conservative measures (diet, exercise, cognitive behavioral therapy)^13,14 to medications (e.g. benzphetamine, orlistat, rimonabant)¹⁵ and bariatric surgery (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, sleeve gastrectomy, vertical band gastroplasty).¹⁶ Of these options, bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for rapid weight loss but is still associated with an approximately 10–27% failure rate.^17,18 Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and neuroleptics constitute the mainstay treatments for AN at present. The efficacy of these treatments, however, is fairly poor and up to 30% of AN patients prove to be medically intractable.¹⁹ The situation is similar for BN; patients are typically treated with CBT²⁰ and/or antidepressant pharmacotherapy,²¹ but the majority of patients remain symptomatic following therapy.²²

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an invasive but non-lesional neurosurgical procedure that delivers electrical pulses to targeted brain structures via electrodes connected to an implantable pulse generator (IPG). It is well established as a safe and efficacious treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease, dystonia and tremor,²³ presenting a more flexible approach compared to lesioning treatments owing to its reversibility and modifiability. More recently, DBS has shown promise as a potential treatment for several circuit-based neuropsychiatric conditions, including obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD),^24,25 major depression,^26,27 Tourette’s syndrome,^28,29 and Alzheimer’s disease.^30,31 It has also been explored for use in eating disorders such as morbid obesity and AN.

By contrast, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) involves transcranial stimulation of cortical neural targets in a non-surgical manner. Of the many different NIBS modalities that exist, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are among the most popular and frequently studied. Each differs in terms of its mechanism of stimulation; rTMS passes brief current pulses through a coil over the scalp in order to generate an electromagnetic field that inhibits (low frequency, <5 Hz rTMS) or activates (high frequency, >5 Hz rTMS) target neurons,³² while tDCS delivers weak electrical current to brain regions through electrodes placed on the scalp in order to either depolarize (anodal tDCS) or hyperpolarize (cathodal tDCS) resident neurons.³³ Both rTMS and tDCS have been explored with varying success for a multitude of indications, including OCD,^34,35 depression,^36,37 anxiety,^38,39 chronic pain,^40,41 stroke rehabilitation^42,43 and addiction.^44,45 They too have been applied to eating disorders and obesity.

Here, we review the theoretical rationale and current results of DBS and NIBS for eating disorders and obesity.

Neurobiology of eating behavior: homeostatic and reward pathways

While the neural basis of eating behavior is not fully understood, it has been linked to an interaction between reward pathways (mesolimbic and mesocortical pathways; Figure 1) and homeostatic circuitry that regulates an individual’s perceived dietary energy needs. Certainly, the hypothalamus is well-recognized to play an integral role in maintaining homeostasis with regards to energy balance, constituting a key junction between the endocrine and nervous systems via its responsiveness to gut and adipocyte-derived hormones, integration of multimodal feeding-related sensory signals and close connections with brainstem regions (such as the nucleus of the solitary tract) involved in autonomic monitoring.⁴⁶ The importance of hypothalamic control over eating behavior is further evinced by the consequences of lesioning this region, which variably include secondary anorexia^47,48 and secondary obesity.⁴⁹ Informed by rodent studies in the 1950s and 1960s, the hypothalamus was classically envisioned as regulating eating behavior through competing ‘feeding’ (lateral hypothalamus) and ‘satiety’ (ventromedial hypothalamus) centers that, when lesioned or stimulated, dramatically altered food intake patterns. Specifically, lateral hypothalamus lesions resulted in severe aphagia, food aversion and weight loss, while ventromedial lesions led to voracious, uncontrolled eating and weight gain.^50,51–53

Figure 1.

Reward pathways and interactions. This schematic illustrates the hypothalamic–mesocorticolimbic pathways and potential anatomical targets involved with reward, cognitive control, motivation and the learning/memory circuits. Reward and saliency involve the ventral tegmental area, nucleus accumbens and caudate. The orbitofrontal cortex and subgenual cingulate cortex are thought to be involved in motivation and drive. The learning/memory circuit, which includes the amygdala, hippocampus and putamen, are also components in eating neurobiology. Inhibitory control has been known to involve the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, and the anterior cingulate cortex. The arrows signify the direction of signal transmission.

While these early experiments have since been deemed somewhat imprecise, this ‘dual center model’ has nonetheless held up well as a basic schema of hypothalamic control over appetite.⁵⁴ The lateral hypothalamus is the only region in the brain containing neurons that produce orexins, a peptide implicated in hunger and arousal. Indeed, dysregulation or loss of orexin signaling has been associated with obesity.⁵⁵ In contrast, the ventromedial hypothalamus contains a high number of leptin receptors, which are involved in satiety. In mice, high levels of leptin are usually associated with reduced feeding, while animals with low leptin levels tend to eat uncontrollably.⁵⁶

Reward circuitry – in particular the mesolimbic and mesocortical pathways – also play a key role in governing eating behavior. The mesolimbic reward pathway is a dopaminergic pathway that runs within the medial forebrain bundle, connecting the ventral tegmental area (VTA) to the nucleus accumbens (NAc)⁵⁷ within the ventral striatum. It has long been associated with immediate rewards, and along with other cortical reward areas is consistently activated by palatable foods, drugs of abuse, copulation and other rewarding stimuli.^58–61 Moreover, mesolimbic dopamine release in response to rewarding stimuli is known both to track stimulus salience and novelty and reflect the influence of expectation and reinforcement, underlining its role in motivation, want and addiction.^62,63 Unlike the hypothalamus, the NAc is believed to instantiate the value of stimuli like food, regardless of appetite or satiety.^63,64 More specifically, rodent studies indicate the existence of a rostral ‘hotspot’ in the NAc shell where GABAergic and glutamatergic activation produces appetitive behaviors, while the same neurotransmitters administered in a more caudal ‘coldspot’ result in fearful or defensive behaviors.^65,66 By contrast, the mesocortical pathway, which comprises dopaminergic output from the VTA to the prefrontal cortex (PFC), is heavily implicated in instantiation of delayed reward, cognitive control, motivation and regulation of emotional responses.⁶⁷ Moreover, human imaging studies suggest that the PFC and mesocortical pathway are specifically involved in regulating food intake.⁶⁸

It is important to note the close structural and functional interconnectivity between homeostatic circuitry and reward pathways in the brain. The mesolimbic pathway, for instance, is closely connected to the hypothalamic areas via the infero-medial branch of the medial forebrain bundle.⁶⁹ It is also understood that orexins originating in the lateral hypothalamus modulate VTA and mesolimbic pathway activity.^70,71 The relevance of this orexin regulation to behavior is borne out by rodent studies that revealed orexin receptor blockade reduces both interest in and NAc dopamine release response to drugs of abuse.^72–74

Anatomical targets for obesity

When deciding on a neuromodulation target for obesity, there are multiple aspects of overeating that can potentially be treated. Different parts of the brain regulate motivation, volitional control, addiction, memory and reward. Moreover, it is important to determine if the goal is to increase metabolism, reduce the pleasure/addiction to eating and/or influence an individual’s decision-making and volitional control.

Hypothalamus

On the basis of aforementioned lesion studies in rodents, felines, canines, porcines and non-human primates,^{50–52,75–77} the hypothalamus has long been an attractive DBS target for obesity. Specifically, high-frequency stimulation (180–200 Hz) of the lateral hypothalamus has been shown to reduce feeding and produce sustained weight loss in rodent and primate DBS models.^78,79 It also appears to result in increased metabolism in the hippocampus, amygdala and mammillary body.⁸⁰ In contrast, low-frequency (50 Hz) lateral hypothalamus stimulation increased feeding.^81–83 The opposite pattern occurred when targeting the ventromedial hypothalamus; here, high-frequency stimulation caused weight gain in rodent and primate models,^84,85 while low-frequency stimulation promoted weight loss.⁷⁷ Interestingly, as orexin deficiency is associated with obesity, driving this pathway may help to prevent and treat obesity.⁵⁵

Nucleus accumbens

Obesity is a multifactorial disease that involves altered patterns of eating and satiety as well as dysfunctional reward and compulsive traits.⁸⁶ Several models emphasize the role of dopaminergic reward circuits, with each proposing a different account of the specifics of the abnormality and how it relates to overeating.⁸⁷ The reward surfeit model posits that those at risk for obesity have a greater reward responsivity in the gustatory and somatosensory cortex.⁸⁸ Indeed, there is evidence that an elevated responsiveness of reward-related regions may portend a poor outcome in weight-loss programs.⁸⁹ The incentive sensitization model suggests that repeated food intake leads to an elevated responsivity to foods due to conditioning.⁹⁰ The reward deficit model posits there is lower brain dopamine activity in obese subjects, predisposing them to excessive eating.⁹¹

Animal models have demonstrated that lesioning the NAc eliminates food-hoarding behavior and promotes weight loss.⁹² High-frequency stimulation (160 Hz, 60 μs pulse width) of the lateral NAc shell in obese rats was noted to increase D2 receptor gene expression and DA levels and result in weight loss; however, there was no change in normal-weight rats.⁹³ Interestingly, stimulation (130 Hz, 60 µs pulse width) of the medial NAc shell increased feeding.⁹⁴ Furthermore, animal studies have demonstrated that bilateral high-frequency NAc stimulation reduces binge-eating.⁹⁵

Other targets for obesity

There are many other potential DBS targets for obesity beyond the lateral hypothalamus and NAc. One study comparing fMRI BOLD activity in response to pictures of food between obese participants and healthy controls observed significantly greater activation in the obese group, not only in NAc/ventral striatum, but also in medial and lateral orbitofrontal cortex, medial PFC, insula, anterior cingulate cortex, amygdala, ventral pallidum, caudate, putamen and hippocampus. In contrast, there was decreased hypothalamic and dorsal anterior cingulate cortex activation in the obese cohort.⁹⁶ Other work has found evidence of decreased PFC and striatum metabolism with correlating alterations in dopamine in obese individuals.⁵⁹

Clinical DBS trials for obesity

Hypothalamus

Informed by promising preclinical data, lesioning experiments were performed on the lateral hypothalamus in the 1970s with the intent to break the reward cycle for eating. These studies demonstrated initial weight loss in obese patients; after 1 year, however, treated patients regained the weight.^97,98 Nonetheless, this work provided further support for trials exploring neuromodulation of the homeostatic system.

In 2008, bilateral ventromedial hypothalamus stimulation for obesity was performed (Table 1). In this case report of a 50-year-old man with morbid obesity, high-frequency (130 Hz) stimulation did not alter the patient’s overall weight. However, low-frequency (50 Hz) stimulation resulted in initial weight loss followed by weight gain. These results were confounded by the patient turning off the stimulation at night in order to eat during the latter part of the trial, suggesting DBS may have affected the patient’s appetite but not overall desire to eat.³⁰ High-frequency stimulation of ventromedial hypothalamus has resulted in interesting side effects other than weight loss. In one case report, stimulation led to memory benefits,³⁰ while a second case report indicated that stimulation induced panic attacks.⁹⁹ The failure of ventromedial hypothalamic stimulation may be due to redundant mechanisms in the hypothalamic-mediated regulation of feeding. Alternatively, stimulation may shut down both orexigenic and anorexigenic mechanisms via current spread to the neighboring lateral hypothalamus.¹⁰⁰ This preliminary result was followed by a small, three-patient case series of bilateral lateral hypothalamic DBS in failed gastric bypass patients. High-frequency monopolar (185 Hz, 90 μs pulse width) stimulation was used with no adverse effects at 35 months. Resting metabolic rate was also measured using indirect calorimetry in a respiratory chamber, and was found to be augmented by DBS. While no improvement in weight was observed when DBS parameters were programmed to standard (movement disorder-informed) settings, stimulation programmed to optimize resting metabolic rate was associated with weight loss in two of three patients. Resting metabolic rate-optimized stimulation was also linked to subjective reports of decreased urge to eat and increased energy levels.¹⁰¹

Table 1.

DBS for morbid obesity patients. This table illustrates six reports of DBS for obesity. Four female patients and two male adult patients underwent DBS targeting either the hypothalamus or the nucleus accumbens. Four out of the six patients exhibited a reduction in their BMI after DBS.

Study	Target	Stimulation parameters	Number of patients	Age	Gender	Initial BMI	BMI after DBS	Follow up (months)	Comorbidities
Hamani and colleagues³⁰	Ventral hypothalamus	130, 50 Hz, 60 μs pw, 2.8 V	1	50	Male	55	–	5	DM2, HTN, OSA
Whiting and colleagues¹⁰¹	Lateral hypothalamus	185 Hz, 90 μs pw	3	45–60	2 female, 1 male	45–49	(1) 0.9% decrease, (2) 12.3% decrease, (3) 16.4% decrease	30–39	(1) HTN; (2) OSA/DM2, HTN, migraine; (3) lower extremity edema
Mantione and colleagues¹⁰²	NAc	185 Hz, 90 μs pw, 3.5 V	1	47	Female	37	25	24	OCD
Harat and colleagues¹⁰³	NAc	130 Hz, 208 μs pw, 2 mA	1	19	Female	53	48	14	Cranipharyngioma

DBS, deep brain stimulation; DM 2, type 2 diabetes mellitus; HTN, hypertension; NAc, nucleus accumbens; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; pw, pulse width.

Nucleus accumbens

In addition to targeting the homeostatic center, clinical studies have also utilized DBS to stimulate the mesolimbic pathway – specifically the NAc. In two separate case reports, bilateral NAc DBS resulted in weight loss and a reduction in BMI.^102,103 In the first case, a woman suffered from obesity and obsessive compulsive disorder. Bilateral NAc stimulation (185 Hz, 90 μs pulse width) resulted in a significant reduction in BMI and weight loss at 2 years after DBS implantation. In the second case, a woman suffered from hypothalamic obesity secondary to a craniopharyngioma status post resection. Chronic bilateral NAc stimulation (130 Hz, 208 µs pulse width) led to a reduction in BMI 14 months after surgery.

Anatomical targets for anorexia nervosa

Insula

AN is an eating disorder characterized by low body weight (<18.5 kg/m²), fear of gaining weight and a distorted perception of body and self-image. It is often comorbid with affective disorders such as depression or bipolar disorder. Moreover, it is frequently associated with reward processing abnormalities and obsessive habits resembling those seen in OCD behavior.^104–106 Prior imaging studies suggest AN involves dysfunction within a number of neural pathways, including circuitry pertaining to self-awareness (parietal cortex, insula), visual and gustatory sensation (occipital cortex and insula) and reward (ventral striatum, anterior and subcallosal cingulate, dorsolateral PFC and ventromedial PFC).^59,107–109 The insula, which subserves interoception (an individual’s self-observation of the body’s internal homeostasis), is implicated in many of these circuits and may particularly relate to distorted perceptions in AN.

Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens

One theory of AN pathogenesis suggests there exists an imbalance in serotonergic signaling within the ventral striatum, perhaps related to the aversion aspect of the disorder.¹¹⁰ Another theory is that there are perturbations in the reward pathways.^111–113 Disrupting the dopamine system can affect the reward circuitry, leading to a dysphoric mood and anxiety.^6,114 There is evidence of a dopamine imbalance in the ventral striatum.¹¹⁰ AN patients have been found to exhibit decreased ventral striatum activity as well as overactivity in the caudate.¹¹⁵ Furthermore, AN patients’ reward pathways are activated by disease-related stimuli, but are not necessarily activated with typical rewarding stimuli. For instance, there is overactivation of the ventral striatum in response to thin, underweight stimuli,¹¹⁶ unlike in morbid obesity where the ventral striatum is preferentially engaged by eating. Similarly, the ventromedial PFC is significantly more active in AN patients during exposure to high- and low-caloric food items.¹¹⁷

Other targets for anorexia

Evidence also exists for dysfunctional decision-making processes in AN patients. In fact, imaging work indicates there is reduced glucose perfusion in decision-making and motor action centers in patients with AN (superior frontal cortex, caudate, thalamus and putamen).¹¹⁸ Moreover, the anterior cingulate is implicated in AN by the finding that AN patients possess decreased cingulate volume compared to controls, with subsequent enlargement after recovery.¹¹⁹

Clinical DBS trials for anorexia nervosa

Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens

Early case studies in the 1950s suggested that disrupting the reward pathways through limbic leucotomy,^120,121 thalamotomy¹²² and capsulotomy¹²³ could produce benefits in AN patients and prove useful as a last resort for intractable cases. However, the clinical outcomes have been inconclusive. Given evidence of reward pathway disruption in AN, the ventral striatum (and the NAc in particular)⁵⁷ has been identified as a potential DBS target for this condition (Table 2). In one study, a cohort of AN patients with comorbid OCD, depression or anxiety underwent stereotactic radiofrequency ablation of the NAc (six patients) or bilateral NAc DBS (two patients; 135–185 Hz). In both treatment groups, BMI as well as comorbid psychiatric symptoms showed improvement after 1 year in conjunction with decreased psychoticism, neuroticism and lying tendencies, and improvements in memory/cognition at 6 months.¹²⁴ Another trial examining bilateral NAc DBS (180 Hz) in four AN patients with comorbid OCD or generalized anxiety also demonstrated improvements in BMI.¹²⁵ DBS targeting the bilateral ventral capsule/ventral striatum (120 Hz) in a patient with OCD, major depression and AN similarly produced gains in weight and BMI.¹¹⁹ Importantly, NAc DBS also appears to reverse a number of metabolic abnormalities seen in AN; according to one PET study, hypermetabolism in the frontal lobes, hippocampus and lentiform nucleus was decreased in six AN patients following NAc DBS.¹⁰⁷

Table 2.

DBS for anorexia nervosa patients. This table illustrates 25 cases of DBS for anorexia nervosa. All 25 patients were adult female patients who underwent DBS targeting the NAc, SCC, VC/VS, or BNST. All of the studies, except for the VC/VS and BNST (no follow up for the VC/VS study, decrease in weight with the BNST study) studies, demonstrated an increase in BMI with DBS.

Study	Target	Stimulation parameters	Number of patients	Age	Gender	Initial BMI	BMI after DBS	Follow up (months)	Comorbidities
Wang and colleagues¹²⁴	NAc	135–185 Hz, 120–210 µs pw, 2.5–3.8 V	2	18–28	Female	12.9–13.3	18–21	12	(1) OCD, depression, anxiety; (2) depression, anxiety
Wu and colleagues¹²⁵	NAc	180 Hz, 90 µs pw	4	16–17	Female	10–13.3	17–22	9–50	(1) OCD; (2) OCD; (3) OCD; (4) Anxiety disorder
Israel and colleagues¹²⁶	SCC	Right-sided: 130 Hz, 91 µs pw, 5 mA	1	52	Female	14.4	19	30	Depression
Lipsman and colleagues,¹²⁷ Lipsman et al.¹²⁸	SCC	130 Hz, 90 µs pw, 5–6 V	16	34	Female	13.8 ± 1.5	17.3 ± 3.4	12
McLaughlin and colleagues ¹¹⁹	VC/VS	120 Hz, 120 µs pw, 7.5 V	1	52	Female	18.5			OCD, depression
Blomstedt and colleagues¹²⁹	BNST	130 Hz, 120 µs pw, 4.3 V	1	60	Female	15.2	14.3	12

BNST: bed nucleus of stria terminalis; NAc: nucleus accumbens; OCD: obsessive-compulsive disorder; pw: pulse width; SCC, subgenual cingulate cortex; VC/VS: ventral capsule/ventral striatum.

Subgenual cingulate cortex

Another potential target for AN DBS is the subgenual cingulate cortex (SCC), a region with cortical projections to the medial and orbitofrontal cortex and subcortical projections to NAc, which is known to play an important role in mood regulation.¹²⁹ The SCC exhibits increased activity and decreased 5-HT_2A binding in AN.¹³⁰ It also exhibits altered connectivity, with predominance in left-sided abnormalities. More specifically, tractography work has identified increased left parieto-occipital, dorsolateral prefrontal and left cerebellum connectivity, as well as decreased lower thalamic, mid- and anterior cingulate, and left anterior temporal cortices connectivity within the SCC in AN patients. The most conspicuous differences were increased connectivity between the SCC and the ipsilateral parietal cortex and decreased connectivity between the SCC and bilateral thalami.¹²⁹ These findings are consistent with dysfunctional affective circuitry in patients with AN. Greater pre-operative deficits in connectivity within the left fornix, inferior frontal occipital cortex and right anterior limb of the internal capsule have been associated with better post-operative DBS affective clinical outcomes.

In 2010, Israel and colleagues described a patient with depression and AN who underwent SCC stimulation that resulted in improvement in mood. Here, they implanted bilateral SCC electrodes; however, they only stimulated the right side chronically (130 Hz, 91 µs pulse width). This stimulation resulted in a sustained elevation in her BMI and improvement in depression.¹²⁶ In 2013, Lipsman and colleagues completed a phase I clinical trial stimulating bilateral SCC (130 Hz, 90 µs pulse width) in six patients, finding improvement in mood, anxiety, anorexia-related obsessions and compulsions in two-thirds of the patients. More recently, Lipsman and colleagues published their open-label 1-year follow up on 16 patients (including the initial six patients) with SCC stimulation for AN. In this cohort, 14 of the 16 patients had mood disorders, anxiety disorders or both. Here, they reported sustained improvements in BMI and affective symptoms in some of the patients without significant side effects. Significant changes in cerebral glucose metabolism were also noted in AN-related regions (decreased metabolism: SCC, anterior cingulate; increased metabolism: parietal lobe).^127,128 The most common adverse event was pain related to the incision site. Two of the 16 patients had their DBS system removed or deactivated due to poorly defined reasons.

Bed nucleus of stria terminalis

Yet another stimulation target currently under investigation for AN is the stria terminalis, a key output channel for the amygdala connecting to the hypothalamus. The bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) in particular is implicated in threat monitoring,¹³² and has been proposed to play a part in an anxiety-regulating network comprising the amygdala, hypothalamus, thalamus and orbitofrontal cortex¹³³ that is closely modulated by serotonergic activity.¹³⁴ A recent case report found that bilateral BNST stimulation (130 Hz, 120 µs pulse width) in a patient with major depressive disorder and AN resulted in improvement in depression and anxiety (including anxiety about food and eating) after 1 year, but without any concomitant BMI changes.¹²⁹

Non-invasive brain stimulation for eating disorders

NIBS modalities such as rTMS and tDCS have also been explored for the treatment of obesity and eating disorders. Building on promising work in psychiatric indications such as depression and addiction,^{36–39,44,45,135} NIBS methods have typically targeted the PFC in the context of disorders of eating behavior. As a key node of the brain’s frontostriatal cognitive circuits, the PFC – particularly the dorsolateral PFC (dlPFC) – is known to underpin executive functions such as inhibitory cognitive control.^136,137 Furthermore, its activity has been closely linked to self-control in a dietary context.⁶⁸ The PFC is also implicated in higher-order reward processing as part of its involvement in the mesocortical dopaminergic pathway.¹³⁸ Indeed, dopaminergic signaling within the PFC has been linked to regulation of food intake.¹³⁹

NIBS for obesity

In line with this schema, studies examining the effect of single-session dlPFC NIBS in healthy participants who endorsed food cravings consistently found stimulation reduced cravings in the immediate aftermath of stimulation.^140–144 However, a recent meta-analysis established that these single-session effects did not translate into a significant effect on food consumption.¹⁴⁵ A total of eight trials have thus far explored the effect of dlPFC NIBS in overweight or obese participants (Table 3). An initial randomized, blinded trial explored the impact of single-session bilateral dlPFC (2 mA, 20 min, anodal right dlPFC stimulation and cathodal left dlPFC stimulation) tDCS in 19 participants, finding stimulation decreased food cravings but not food consumption during subsequent same-day testing.¹⁴² However, only 11 of 19 participants were overweight or obese, and no outcomes were reported for the overweight/obese cohort specifically. As such, the validity of these findings with respect to obese individuals is uncertain. In an ensuing randomized controlled trial of nine overweight participants, Montenegro and colleagues found that a single session of left dlPFC anodal tDCS (2 mA, 20 min) reduced appetite and desire to eat during immediate post-treatment testing.¹⁴⁶ Subsequently, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled crossover experiment found that three sessions of anodal tDCS (2 mA, 40 min) targeting left dlPFC led to reduced caloric consumption (as well as greater weight loss over the three-day study period) in nine overweight/obese participants following completion of stimulation. However, this finding only proved statistically significant when anodal stimulation was compared with inhibitory cathodal stimulation (not when anodal stimulation was compared to sham stimulation), limiting the interpretability of these results.¹⁴⁷ Bravo and colleagues further probed the applicability of NIBS for obesity by examining the effect of five sessions of right dlPFC tDCS (2 mA, 30 min) in a double-blind, sham-controlled manner within two cohorts of interest, one composed of 11 obese participants and the other comprising 10 Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients. In both groups, active stimulation was associated with decreased food cravings (as well as reduced compulsive eating behaviors in the PWS cohort) but no weight loss at 30 days post-treatment.¹⁴⁸ Meanwhile, Burgess and colleagues conducted a blinded, sham-controlled trial of single-session dlPFC tDCS (2 mA, 20 min) in 30 overweight patients with binge-eating disorder using a right dlPFC anode/left dlPFC cathode montage.¹⁴⁹ During immediate post-treatment testing, active stimulation decreased both food cravings and food intake. Furthermore, it was reported to reduce binge-eating desire but not binge-eating frequency in male patients only. Another blinded, sham-controlled study demonstrated diminished cravings in 13 overweight/obese individuals that was maintained 30 days after five sessions of anodal right dlPFC tDCS (2 mA, 40 min), constituting the first description of sustained NIBS outcomes in this population.¹⁵⁰ It should be noted that the legitimacy of the blinding protocol has been questioned, however.¹⁵¹ More recently, Ray and colleagues reported a double-blind sham-controlled trial of single-session bilateral dlPFC tDCS (2 mA, 20 min) in 18 obese participants employing the same right dlPFC anode/left dlPFC cathode montage described by Burgess and colleagues. Here, active stimulation failed to produce significant effects in the cohort overall but did reduce immediate post-treatment food cravings and food consumption in certain participant subgroups when trait scores (e.g. impulsiveness, intent to restrict calories) were controlled.¹⁵²

Table 3.

NIBS (rTMS and tDCS) for obesity patients. This table illustrates 31 cases of transcranial direct current stimulation and 13 cases of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for obesity.

Study	Modality	Target	Stimulation parameters	Stimulation timing	Number of patients	Age	Outcome	Follow up (effect duration)
Goldman and colleagues¹⁴²	tDCS	Bl dlPFC	2 mA, anodal (R dlPFC), cathodal (L dlPFC)	Single 20-min session	19*	32.5 ± 11	Decreased food cravings but not food intake	None (unknown effect duration)
Montenegro and colleagues¹⁴⁶	tDCS	L dlPFC	2 mA, anodal	Single 20-min session	9	20–32	Decreased appetite/desire to eat	None (unknown effect duration)
Gluck and colleagues¹⁴⁷	tDCS	L dlPFC	2 mA, anodal	3 40-min sessions over 3 days	9	42 ± 8	Decreased caloric consumption and greater weight loss compared to cathodal tDCS	None (unknown effect duration)
Bravo and colleagues¹⁴⁸	tDCS	R dlPFC	2 mA, anodal	5 30-min sessions over 5 days	11	47 ± 11	Decreased food cravings but no weight loss	30 days (effect observed at last follow up)
Luzi and colleagues¹⁵³	rTMS	Bl dlPFC	18 Hz	3 sessions per week for 5 weeks	11	–	Reduction in food cravings and weight loss	9 weeks (effect observed at last follow up)
Burgess and colleagues¹⁴⁹	tDCS	Bl dlPFC	2 mA, anodal (R dlPFC), cathodal (L dlPFC)	Single 20-min session	30**	–	Decreased food cravings and food intake; decreased binge-eating desire in male participants only	None (unknown effect duration)
Ljubisavljevic and colleagues¹⁵⁰	tDCS	R dlPFC	2 mA, anodal	5 40-min sessions over 5 days	13***	21 ± 2	Decreased food cravings	30 days (effect observed at last follow up)
Ray and colleagues¹⁵²	tDCS	Bl dlPFC	2 mA, anodal (R dlPFC), cathodal (L dlPFC)	Single 20-min session	18	23 ± 8	No decrease in food cravings or intake overall; decreased cravings/consumption when trait scores were controlled	None (unknown effect duration)

Bl, bilateral; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; L, left; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; R, right; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

Only 11 of 19 participants were overweight or obese according to their BMI; **Burgess and colleagues’ participants were both overweight (BMI > 24.5 kg/m²) and met criteria for binge-eating disorder; ***Ljubisavljevic and colleagues also reported on 17 additional healthy participants with normal BMI.

Thus far, only a single study has looked at the effect of rTMS in obese participants. Luzi and colleagues found that 5 weeks of high-frequency (18 Hz) rTMS targeting bilateral dlPFC at a frequency of 3 sessions per week led to significant reductions in food cravings as well as weight loss in a cohort of 11 obese participants. Notably, this effect was maintained after 9 weeks and proved statistically significant in comparison to both inhibitory low-frequency rTMS and sham rTMS.¹⁵³

NIBS for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

Thus far, five studies have investigated NIBS for AN (Table 4). Kamolz and colleagues first described a case report of left dlPFC rTMS in a patient with AN and comorbid depression (10 Hz, 2000 pulses, 41 sessions). According to this report, the patient’s depressive symptomology was significantly improved and her BMI increased from 12.4 to 16 after 3 months (29% increase).¹⁵⁴ Two subsequent studies also yielded encouraging results with regard to AN and affective symptoms. Specifically, Van den Eynde and colleagues observed reduced perception of feeling fat, full and anxious in 10 AN patients immediately following left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses, one session).¹⁵⁵ Meanwhile, Khedr and colleagues reported a trial of tDCS for AN, finding that 10 sessions of left dlPFC anodal stimulation (2 mA, 25 min) improved AN and depressive symptoms in five of seven patients immediately post-treatment and in three of seven patients at 1 month follow up.¹⁵⁶ More recently, McClelland and colleagues conducted a double-blind, sham-controlled trial examining the effects of a single session of left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses) in 49 AN patients. This study demonstrated improved core AN symptoms and temporal discounting 24 h after treatment, lending support to earlier uncontrolled results.¹⁵⁷ A five-patient case series by the same group investigated the effect of high-frequency left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses, 20 sessions) on both eating disorder and affective symptoms over 12 months, finding eating disorder symptoms to be improved in three of five patients and affective symptoms to be improved in two of five. Despite this, all five patients lost weight over the follow-up period, indicating that NIBS’s impact on self-reported symptoms may not always translate to weight gain.¹⁵⁸

Table 4.

NIBS (rTMS and tDCS) for AN patients. This table illustrates seven cases of tDCS and 65 cases of rTMS DBS for AN.

Study	Modality	Indication	Target	Stimulation parameters	Stimulation timing	Number of patients	Age	Outcome	Follow up (effect duration)	Comorbidities
Kamolz and colleagues¹⁵⁴	rTMS	AN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 2000 pulses	41 sessions	1	24	BMI increase from 12.4 to 16 (29%)	3 months(effect observed at last follow up)	Depression
Van den Eynde and colleagues¹⁵⁵	rTMS	AN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	Single session	10	18–44	Reduced perception of feeling fat, full, anxious	None (unknown effect duration)	Not specified
Khedr and colleagues¹⁵⁶	tDCS	AN	L dlPFC	2 mA, anodal	10 25-min sessions over 10 days	7	16–39	Improved AN and depression symptoms in 5 patients immediately post-treatment, in 3 patients at 1 month post-treatment	1 month (effect observed at last follow up)	Depression, anxiety
McClelland and colleagues¹⁵⁸	rTMS	AN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	20 20-min sessions	5	23–52	Improved eating disorder, affective symptoms; weight loss in all participants	12 months (effect observed at last follow up)	Not specified
McClelland and colleagues¹⁵⁷	rTMS	AN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	Single 20-min session	49	~26±7.5	Improved AN core symptoms and temporal discounting	24 h (effect observed at last follow up)	Depression, anxiety

AN, anorexia nervosa; Bl, bilateral; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; dmPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; L, left; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; R, right; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

NIBS has also been studied in BN. Thus far, two case reports, one case series and three randomized control trials have studied the effects of PFC rTMS for this indication (Table 5).^{155,159–164} In both case studies, patients with comorbid BN and depression were treated with multiple sessions of rTMS and subsequently demonstrated improvement in depressive symptoms along with complete recovery from binging and purging symptoms in the short term. These results were observed immediately following 10 days of left dlPFC rTMS (20 Hz),¹⁵⁹ and up to 2 months after 20 days of bilateral dorsomedial PFC rTMS (10 Hz, 3000 pulses).¹⁶⁴ Another case series compared the effect of single-session left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses) on 14 right-handed patients and 7 left-handed patients, finding that the two groups exhibited decreased cravings immediately post-treatment but had opposing mood changes (improved mood in right-handed patients, worsened mood in left-handed patients).¹⁶² However, results from randomized sham-controlled trials have been mixed. Van den Eynde and colleagues reported favorable results in their 38-patient trial of single-session left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses), observing a significantly decreased urge to eat and fewer binge-eating episodes at 24 h post-treatment following stimulation compared to sham stimulation.¹⁶³ By contrast, an earlier study subjected a 14-patient cohort to 15 days of left dlPFC rTMS (20 Hz, 2000 pulses), but did not find any significant difference in binge symptoms between active and sham rTMS.¹⁶¹ A similarly null result was obtained in a more recent 47-patient trial by Gay and colleagues, who found no difference in the rates of binging or purging symptoms over 15 days following a 10-day course of left dlPFC rTMS (10 Hz, 1000 pulses, 20 min).¹⁶⁰ The impact of tDCS on BN has been examined only once, in a randomized double-blind, sham-controlled trial in 39 patients. Interestingly, Kekic and colleagues found that both right and left dlPFC anodal tDCS (2 mA, 20 min) were associated with a decreased urge to binge-eat and improved temporal discounting 24 h post-treatment, but only right dlPFC was followed by improved mood.¹⁶⁵

Table 5.

NIBS (rTMS and tDCS) for BN patients. This table illustrates 39 cases of tDCS and 122 cases of rTMS DBS for BN.

Study	Modality	Indication	Target	Stimulation parameters	Stimulation timing	Number of patients	Age	Outcome	Follow up (effect duration)	Comorbidities
Hausmann and colleagues¹⁵⁹	rTMS	BN	L dlPFC	20 Hz	10 sessions over 10 days	1	28	Complete recovery from binging/purging episodes; ~50% depression improvement	None (unknown effect duration)	Depresion
Walpoth and colleagues¹⁶¹	rTMS	BN	L dlPFC	20 Hz, 2000 pulses	15 sessions over 15 days	14	~25 ± 7	No significant improvement in binge symptoms between sham and real rTMS	None (unknown effect duration)	Depression
Van den Eynde and colleagues¹⁶³	rTMS	BN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	Single 20-min session	38	~30.5 ± 11	Decreased urge to eat, fewer binge-eating episodes	24 h (effect observed at last follow up)	–
Van den Eynde and colleagues¹⁶²	rTMS	BN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	Single 20-min session	21 (7 left-handed)	~25 ± 13	Decreased craving; worsened mood in left-handed patients but improved mood in right-handed patients	None (unknown effect duration)	–
Downar and colleagues¹⁶⁴	rTMS	BN	Bl dmPFC	10 Hz, 3000 pulses (per hemisphere)	20 sessions over 20 days	1	43	Full remission from binging/purging episodes, depression	2 months (effect observed at last follow up)	Depression
Gay and colleagues¹⁶⁰	rTMS	BN	L dlPFC	10 Hz, 1000 pulses	10 20-min sessions over 10 days	47	19–40	No significant improvement in binging/purging symptoms between sham and real rTMS	15 days (effect observed at last follow up)	Depression, anxiety, alcohol/substance dependence
Kekic and colleagues¹⁶⁵	tDCS	BN	L and R dlPFC(separate sessions)	2 mA, anodal	20 min sessions	39	18–48	Decreased urge to binge-eat, improved temporal discounting with both L and R dlPFC anodal tDCS; improved mood only following R dlPFC anodal tDCS	24 h (effect observed at last follow up)	Depression, anxiety

Bl, bilateral; BN, bulimia nervosa; dlPFC, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; dmPFC, dorsomedial prefrontal cortex; L, left; mA, milliamps; rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; R, right; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

Conclusion

Obesity and eating disorders remain a significant burden on individuals and society. They are complex conditions that are difficult to treat given the underlying interplay between body homeostasis, reward pathways and affective/limbic circuitry. Despite aggressive medical and surgical management, there remain many refractory patients.

DBS offers a unique, long-lasting, modifiable and targeted treatment for obesity and eating disorders. Its applicability to these conditions is supported by both preclinical and clinical work. However, a number of further studies – including randomized controlled trials – are necessary to better determine DBS’s effectiveness in this field. Furthermore, the exact stimulation parameters, anatomical targets, patient selection, timing and indications for DBS procedures need to be refined. While no significant side effects from any of the DBS targets has been noted to date, future trials should continue to include screening for depression, anxiety and changes in cognition in these weight- and affective-related disorders. In addition, it is worth noting that AN and morbidly obese patients are at increased risk of DBS complications such as infection and hardware erosion due to their poor nutritional status,¹⁶⁶ necessitating special surgical care in treating them.

NIBS has also shown promise for the treatment of obesity, anorexia and bulimia. A small number of randomized, sham-controlled trials have already explored the impact of NIBS for these indications, but further work is necessary to clarify equivocal results, delineate the long-term effects of treatment and better capture weight change-related outcomes in addition to cognitive and affective symptoms. NIBS represents a potentially important treatment option for obesity and eating disorders, given its excellent safety–feasibility profile and lack of serious side effects. However, key limitations of NIBS should be noted, including the need for continued recurrent dosing in order to avoid the wearing off of beneficial effects, the variability of targeting methods and uncertainty over the ideal stimulation parameters, and the variability of effects of different NIBS modalities in terms of their effect on target tissue.¹⁵¹ Additional studies must address these shortcomings if NIBS is to become a reliable and effective tool for obesity and eating disorders. Taken together, these findings suggest a potential role for both DBS and NIBS in the treatment of morbid obesity and eating disorders.

Footnotes

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

de la Rie

Noordenbos

van Furth

EF.

Quality of life and eating disorders. Qual Life Res 2005; 14: 1511–1522.

Fleming

Robinson

et al . Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014; 384: 766–781.

Hoek

HW.

Incidence, prevalence and mortality of anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2006; 19: 389–394.

Flegal

Carroll

Kit

et al . Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999–2010. JAMA 2012; 307: 491–497.

Must

Spadano

Coakley

et al . The disease burden associated with overweight and obesity. JAMA 1999; 282: 1523–1529.

Kaye

Wagner

Fudge

et al . Neurocircuity of eating disorders. Curr Top Behav Neurosci 2011; 6: 37–57.

Polivy

Herman

CP.

Causes of eating disorders. Annu Rev Psychol 2002; 53: 187–213.

Hoek

van Hoeken

Review of the prevalence and incidence of eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord 2003; 34: 383–396.

Zipfel

Lowe

Reas

et al . Long-term prognosis in anorexia nervosa: lessons from a 21-year follow-up study. Lancet 2000; 355: 721–722.

10.

Fairburn

Beglin

SJ.

Studies of the epidemiology of bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 1990; 147: 401–408.

11.

Hudson

Hiripi

Pope

Jr et al . The prevalence and correlates of eating disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Biol Psychiatry 2007; 61: 348–358.

12.

Arcelus

Mitchell

Wales

et al . Mortality rates in patients with anorexia nervosa and other eating disorders: a meta-analysis of 36 studies. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2011; 68: 724–731.

13.

Collazo-Clavell

ML.

Safe and effective management of the obese patient. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 1255–1259; quiz 1259–1260.

14.

Slentz

Duscha

Johnson

et al . Effects of the amount of exercise on body weight, body composition, and measures of central obesity: STRRIDE – a randomized controlled study. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 31–39.

15.

Kang

Park

CY.

Anti-obesity drugs: a review about their effects and safety. Diabetes Metab J 2012; 36: 13–25.

16.

Brethauer

Chand

Schauer

PR.

Risks and benefits of bariatric surgery: current evidence. Cleve Clin J Med 2006; 73: 993–1007.

17.

Axer

Szabo

Naslund

Weight loss and alterations in co-morbidities after revisional gastric bypass: a case-matched study from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13: 796–800.

18.

Wijngaarden

Jonker

FHW

van den Berg

et al . Impact of initial response of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding on outcomes of revisional laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2017; 13: 594–599.

19.

Steinhausen

HC.

The outcome of anorexia nervosa in the 20th century. Am J Psychiatry 2002; 159: 1284–1293.

20.

National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Eating disorders: core interventions in the treatment and management of anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and related eating disorders. Leicester: British Psychological Society, 2004.

21.

McElroy

Guerdjikova

Mori

et al . Current pharmacotherapy options for bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 13: 2015–2026.

22.

Poulsen

Lunn

Daniel

et al . A randomized controlled trial of psychoanalytic psychotherapy or cognitive-behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 2014; 171: 109–116.

23.

Anderson

Iremonger

et al . Selective attenuation of afferent synaptic transmission as a mechanism of thalamic deep brain stimulation-induced tremor arrest. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 841–850.

24.

Greenberg

Malone

Friehs

et al . Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2006; 31: 2384–2393.

25.

Roh

Chang

et al . Long-term follow-up of deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2012; 200: 1067–1070.

26.

Kennedy

Giacobbe

Rizvi

et al . Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: follow-up after 3 to 6 years. Am J Psychiatry 2011; 168: 502–510.

27.

Mayberg

Lozano

Voon

et al . Deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression. Neuron 2005; 45: 651–660.

28.

Ackermans

Duits

van der Linden

et al . Double-blind clinical trial of thalamic stimulation in patients with Tourette syndrome. Brain 2011; 134: 832–844.

29.

Vandewalle

van der Linden

Groenewegen

et al . Stereotactic treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome by high frequency stimulation of thalamus. Lancet 1999; 353: 724.

30.

Hamani

McAndrews

Cohn

et al . Memory enhancement induced by hypothalamic/fornix deep brain stimulation. Ann Neurol 2008; 63: 119–123.

31.

Laxton

Tang-Wai

McAndrews

et al . A phase I trial of deep brain stimulation of memory circuits in Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol 2010; 68: 521–534.

32.

Barker

Jalinous

Freeston

IL.

Non-invasive magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex. Lancet 1985; 1: 1106–1107.

33.

Nitsche

Cohen

Wassermann

et al . Transcranial direct current stimulation: state of the art 2008. Brain Stimul 2008; 1: 206–223.

34.

Palm

Leitner

Kirsch

et al . Prefrontal tDCS and sertraline in obsessive compulsive disorder: a case report and review of the literature. Neurocase 2017; 23: 173–177.

35.

Lee

Koo

Seo

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the supplementary motor area in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder: an open-label pilot study. J Clin Neurosci 2017; 44: 264–268.

36.

Brunoni

Moffa

Sampaio-Junior

et al . Trial of electrical direct-current therapy versus escitalopram for depression. N Engl J Med 2017; 376: 2523–2533.

37.

Wang

Yang

et al . Randomized controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with paroxetine for the treatment of patients with first-episode major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res 2017; 254: 18–23.

38.

Dilkov

Hawken

Kaludiev

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: a randomized, double-blind sham controlled clinical trial. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2017; 78: 61–65.

39.

Heeren

Billieux

Philippot

et al . Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on attentional bias for threat: a proof-of-concept study among individuals with social anxiety disorder. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 2017; 12: 251–260.

40.

Saitoh

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for intractable pain. Brain Nerve 2017; 69: 207–218.

41.

Khedr

Omran

EAH

Ismail

et al . Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on pain, mood and serum endorphin level in the treatment of fibromyalgia: a double blinded, randomized clinical trial. Brain Stimul 2017; 10: 893–901.

42.

Hao

Wang

Zeng

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for improving function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 5: CD008862.

43.

Hummel

Cohen

LG.

Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?

Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 708–712.

44.

Boggio

Sultani

Fecteau

et al . Prefrontal cortex modulation using transcranial DC stimulation reduces alcohol craving: a double-blind, sham-controlled study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008; 92: 55–60.

45.

Camprodon

Martinez-Raga

Alonso-Alonso

et al . One session of high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the right prefrontal cortex transiently reduces cocaine craving. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007; 86: 91–94.

46.

Ahima

Antwi

DA.

Brain regulation of appetite and satiety. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2008; 37: 811–823.

47.

Climo

LH.

Anorexia nervosa associated with hypothalamic tumor: the search for clinical-pathological correlations. Psychiatr J Univ Ott 1982; 7: 20–25.

48.

McClean

Redmond

AO.

Hypothalamic tumour presenting as anorexia nervosa. Ulster Med J 1988; 57: 224–227.

49.

Bauer

HG.

Endocrine and other clinical manifestations of hypothalamic disease; a survey of 60 cases, with autopsies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1954; 14: 13–31.

50.

Anand

Brobeck

JR.

Localization of a ‘feeding center’ in the hypothalamus of the rat. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1951; 77: 323–324.

51.

Stenger

Fournier

Bielajew

The effects of chronic ventromedial hypothalamic stimulation on weight gain in rats. Physiol Behav 1991; 50: 1209–1213.

52.

Brown

Fessler

Rachlin

et al . Changes in food intake with electrical stimulation of the ventromedial hypothalamus in dogs. J Neurosurg 1984; 60: 1253–1257.

53.

Hervey

GR.

The effects of lesions in the hypothalamus in parabiotic rats. J Physiol 1959; 145: 336–352.

54.

Elmquist

Elias

Saper

CB.

From lesions to leptin: hypothalamic control of food intake and body weight. Neuron 1999; 22: 221–232.

55.

Peyron

Tighe

van den Pol

et al . Neurons containing hypocretin (orexin) project to multiple neuronal systems. J Neurosci 1998; 18: 9996–10015.

56.

Cohen

Zhao

Cai

et al . Selective deletion of leptin receptor in neurons leads to obesity. J Clin Invest 2001; 108: 1113–1121.

57.

Bonacasa

Sanchez

Rodriguez

et al . 2-methoxyestradiol attenuates hypertension and coronary vascular remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rats. Maturitas 2008; 61: 310–316.

58.

Iozzo

Metabolic imaging in obesity: underlying mechanisms and consequences in the whole body. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2015; 1353: 21–40.

59.

Val-Laillet

Aarts

Weber

et al . Neuroimaging and neuromodulation approaches to study eating behavior and prevent and treat eating disorders and obesity. Neuroimage Clin 2015; 8: 1–31.

60.

Hernandez

Hoebel

BG.

Feeding and hypothalamic stimulation increase dopamine turnover in the accumbens. Physiol Behav 1988; 44: 599–606.

61.

Radhakishun

Westerink

van Ree

JM.

Dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of freely moving rats determined by on-line dialysis: effects of apomorphine and the neuroleptic-like peptide desenkephalin-gamma-endorphin. Neurosci Lett 1988; 89: 328–334.

62.

Freeman

Bunney

BS.

Chronic neuroleptic effects on dopamine neuron activity: a model for predicting therapeutic efficacy and side effects?

Psychopharmacol Ser 1987; 3: 225–235.

63.

Wise

Rompre

PP.

Brain dopamine and reward. Annu Rev Psychol 1989; 40: 191–225.

64.

Berridge

Kringelbach

ML.

Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron 2015; 86: 646–664.

65.

Reynolds

Berridge

KC.

Fear and feeding in the nucleus accumbens shell: rostrocaudal segregation of GABA-elicited defensive behavior versus eating behavior. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 3261–3270.

66.

Reynolds

Berridge

KC.

Positive and negative motivation in nucleus accumbens shell: bivalent rostrocaudal gradients for GABA-elicited eating, taste ‘liking’/‘disliking’ reactions, place preference/avoidance, and fear. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7308–7320.

67.

McClure

Laibson

Loewenstein

et al . Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science 2004; 306: 503–507.

68.

Lowe

Hall

Staines

WR.

The effects of continuous theta burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on executive function, food cravings, and snack food consumption. Psychosom Med 2014; 76: 503–511.

69.

Coenen

Panksepp

Hurwitz

et al . Human medial forebrain bundle (MFB) and anterior thalamic radiation (ATR): imaging of two major subcortical pathways and the dynamic balance of opposite affects in understanding depression. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 24: 223–236.

70.

Hrabovszky

Molnar

Borsay

et al . Orexinergic input to dopaminergic neurons of the human ventral tegmental area. PLoS One 2013; 8: e83029.

71.

Valdivia

Patrone

Reynaldo

et al . Acute high fat diet consumption activates the mesolimbic circuit and requires orexin signaling in a mouse model. PLoS One 2014; 9: e87478.

72.

Lawrence

Cowen

Yang

et al . The orexin system regulates alcohol-seeking in rats. Br J Pharmacol 2006; 148: 752–759.

73.

Lei

Wegner

et al . Orexin-1 receptor blockade suppresses compulsive-like alcohol drinking in mice. Neuropharmacology 2016; 110: 431–437.

74.

Prince

Rau

Yorgason

et al . Hypocretin/orexin regulation of dopamine signaling and cocaine self-administration is mediated predominantly by hypocretin receptor 1. ACS Chem Neurosci 2015; 6: 138–146.

75.

Rolls

Sanghera

Roper-Hall

The latency of activation of neurones in the lateral hypothalamus and substantia innominata during feeding in the monkey. Brain Res 1979; 164: 121–135.

76.

Anand

Brobeck

JR.

Hypothalamic control of food intake in rats and cats. Yale J Biol Med 1951; 24: 123–140.

77.

Melega

Lacan

Gorgulho

et al . Hypothalamic deep brain stimulation reduces weight gain in an obesity-animal model. PLoS One 2012; 7: e30672.

78.

Takaki

Aou

Oomura

et al . Feeding suppression elicited by electrical and chemical stimulations of monkey hypothalamus. Am J Physiol 1992; 262: R586–R594.

79.

Sani

Jobe

Smith

et al . Deep brain stimulation for treatment of obesity in rats. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 809–813.

80.

Soto-Montenegro

Pascau

Desco

Response to deep brain stimulation in the lateral hypothalamic area in a rat model of obesity: in vivo assessment of brain glucose metabolism. Mol Imaging Biol 2014; 16: 830–837.

81.

Herberg

Blundell

JE.

Lateral hypothalamus: hoarding behavior elicited by electrical stimulation. Science 1967; 155: 349–350.

82.

Folkow

Rubinstein

EH.

Behavioural and autonomic patterns evoked by stimulation of the lateral hypothalamic area in the cat. Acta Physiol Scand 1965; 65: 292–299.

83.

Delgado

Anand

BK.

Increase of food intake induced by electrical stimulation of the lateral hypothalamus. Am J Physiol 1953; 172: 162–168.

84.

Brobeck

JR.

Mechanism of the development of obesity in animals with hypothalamic lesions. Physiol Rev 1946; 26: 541–559.

85.

Lacan

De Salles

Gorgulho

et al . Modulation of food intake following deep brain stimulation of the ventromedial hypothalamus in the vervet monkey: laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg 2008; 108: 336–342.

86.

Haslam

James

WP.

Obesity. Lancet 2005; 366: 1197–1209.

87.

Volkow

Wang

Fowler

et al . Addiction: decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain’s control circuit. Bioessays 2010; 32: 748–755.

88.

Stice

Spoor

Bohon

et al . Relation of reward from food intake and anticipated food intake to obesity: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Abnorm Psychol 2008; 117: 924–935.

89.

Murdaugh

Cox

Cook

3rd et al . fMRI reactivity to high-calorie food pictures predicts short- and long-term outcome in a weight-loss program. Neuroimage 2012; 59: 2709–2721.

90.

Berridge

Richard

et al . The tempted brain eats: pleasure and desire circuits in obesity and eating disorders. Brain Res 2010; 1350: 43–64.

91.

Wang

Volkow

Fowler

JS.

The role of dopamine in motivation for food in humans: implications for obesity. Expert Opin Ther Targets 2002; 6: 601–609.

92.

Kelley

Stinus

Disappearance of hoarding behavior after 6-hydroxydopamine lesions of the mesolimbic dopamine neurons and its reinstatement with L-dopa. Behav Neurosci 1985; 99: 531–545.

93.

Halpern

Tekriwal

Santollo

et al . Amelioration of binge eating by nucleus accumbens shell deep brain stimulation in mice involves D2 receptor modulation. J Neurosci 2013; 33: 7122–7129.

94.

van der Plasse

Schrama

van Seters

et al . Deep brain stimulation reveals a dissociation of consummatory and motivated behaviour in the medial and lateral nucleus accumbens shell of the rat. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33455.

95.

Doucette

Khokhar

Green

AI.

Nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation in a rat model of binge eating. Transl Psychiatry 2015; 5: e695.

96.

Stoeckel

Weller

Cook

3rd et al . Widespread reward-system activation in obese women in response to pictures of high-calorie foods. Neuroimage 2008; 41: 636–647.

97.

Quaade

Letter: stereotaxy for obesity. Lancet 1974; 1: 267.

98.

Quaade

Vaernet

Larsson

Stereotaxic stimulation and electrocoagulation of the lateral hypothalamus in obese humans. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1974; 30: 111–117.

99.

Wilent

Buetefisch

et al . Induction of panic attack by stimulation of the ventromedial hypothalamus. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 1295–1298.

100.

Taghva

Corrigan

Rezai

AR.

Obesity and brain addiction circuitry: implications for deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 2012; 71: 224–238.

101.

Whiting

Tomycz

Bailes

et al . Lateral hypothalamic area deep brain stimulation for refractory obesity: a pilot study with preliminary data on safety, body weight, and energy metabolism. J Neurosurg 2013; 119: 56–63.

102.

Mantione

van de Brink

Schuurman

et al . Smoking cessation and weight loss after chronic deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens: therapeutic and research implications: case report. Neurosurgery 2010; 66: E218; discussion E218.

103.

Harat

Rudas

Zielinski

et al . Nucleus accumbens stimulation in pathological obesity. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2016; 50: 207–210.

104.

Halmi

Agras

Crow

et al . Predictors of treatment acceptance and completion in anorexia nervosa: implications for future study designs. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 776–781.

105.

Keating

Theoretical perspective on anorexia nervosa: the conflict of reward. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2010; 34: 73–79.

106.

Strober

Freeman

Lampert

et al . The association of anxiety disorders and obsessive compulsive personality disorder with anorexia nervosa: evidence from a family study with discussion of nosological and neurodevelopmental implications. Int J Eat Disord 2007; 40(Suppl.): S46–S51.

107.

Zhang

Zhao

et al . Metabolic imaging of deep brain stimulation in anorexia nervosa: a 18F-FDG PET/CT study. Clin Nucl Med 2013; 38: 943–948.

108.

Delvenne

Goldman

De Maertelaer

et al . Brain glucose metabolism in anorexia nervosa and affective disorders: influence of weight loss or depressive symptomatology. Psychiatry Res 1997; 74: 83–92.

109.

Ellison

Foong

Howard

et al . Functional anatomy of calorie fear in anorexia nervosa. Lancet 1998; 352: 1192.

110.

Daw

Kakade

Dayan

Opponent interactions between serotonin and dopamine. Neural Netw 2002; 15: 603–616.

111.

Kaye

Bailer

UF.

Understanding the neural circuitry of appetitive regulation in eating disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2011; 70: 704–705.

112.

Kaye

Wierenga

Bailer

et al . Nothing tastes as good as skinny feels: the neurobiology of anorexia nervosa. Trends Neurosci 2013; 36: 110–120.

113.

Kaye

Wierenga

Bailer

et al . Does a shared neurobiology for foods and drugs of abuse contribute to extremes of food ingestion in anorexia and bulimia nervosa? Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: 836–842.

114.

Kaye

Fudge

Paulus

New insights into symptoms and neurocircuit function of anorexia nervosa. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 573–584.

115.

Wagner

Aizenstein

Venkatraman

et al . Altered reward processing in women recovered from anorexia nervosa. Am J Psychiatry 2007; 164: 1842–1849.

116.

Fladung

Gron

Grammer

et al . A neural signature of anorexia nervosa in the ventral striatal reward system. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 206–212.

117.

Uher

Murphy

Brammer

et al . Medial prefrontal cortex activity associated with symptom provocation in eating disorders. Am J Psychiatry 2004; 161: 1238–1246.

118.

Delvenne

Goldman

De Maertelaer

et al . Brain glucose metabolism in eating disorders assessed by positron emission tomography. Int J Eat Disord 1999; 25: 29–37.

119.

McLaughlin

Didie

Machado

et al . Improvements in anorexia symptoms after deep brain stimulation for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2013; 73: e29–e31.

120.

Morgan

Crisp

AH.

Use of leucotomy for intractable anorexia nervosa: a long-term follow-up study. Int J Eat Disord 2000; 27: 249–258.

121.

Mitchell-Heggs

Kelly

Richardson

Stereotactic limbic leucotomy: a follow-up at 16 months. Br J Psychiatry 1976; 128: 226–240.

122.

Zamboni

Larach

Poblete

et al . Dorsomedial thalamotomy as a treatment for terminal anorexia: a report of two cases. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1993; 58: 34–35.

123.

Barbier

Gabriels

van Laere

et al . Successful anterior capsulotomy in comorbid anorexia nervosa and obsessive-compulsive disorder: case report. Neurosurgery 2011; 69: E745–E751; discussion E751.

124.

Wang

Chang

Geng

et al . Treatment of intractable anorexia nervosa with inactivation of the nucleus accumbens using stereotactic surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2013; 91: 364–372.

125.

Van Dyck-Lippens

Santegoeds

et al . Deep-brain stimulation for anorexia nervosa. World Neurosurg 2013; 80: S29 e21–10.

126.

Israel

Steiger

Kolivakis

et al . Deep brain stimulation in the subgenual cingulate cortex for an intractable eating disorder. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: e53–e54.

127.

Lipsman

Woodside

Giacobbe

et al . Subcallosal cingulate deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: a phase 1 pilot trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1361–1370.

128.

Lipsman

Lam

Volpini

et al . Deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate for treatment-refractory anorexia nervosa: 1 year follow-up of an open-label trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2017; 4: 285–294.

129.

Blomstedt

Naesstrom

Bodlund

Deep brain stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and medial forebrain bundle in a patient with major depressive disorder and anorexia nervosa. Clin Case Rep 2017; 5: 679–684.

130.

Hayes

Lipsman

Chen

et al . Subcallosal cingulate connectivity in anorexia nervosa patients differs from healthy controls: a multi-tensor tractography study. Brain Stimul 2015; 8: 758–768.

131.

Bailer

Price

Meltzer

et al . Altered 5-HT(2A) receptor binding after recovery from bulimia-type anorexia nervosa: relationships to harm avoidance and drive for thinness. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 1143–1155.

132.

Somerville

Whalen

Kelley

WM.

Human bed nucleus of the stria terminalis indexes hypervigilant threat monitoring. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 68: 416–424.

133.

Luyten

Hendrickx

Raymaekers

et al . Electrical stimulation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis alleviates severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 1272–1280.

134.

Lebow

Chen

Overshadowed by the amygdala: the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis emerges as key to psychiatric disorders. Mol Psychiatry 2016; 21: 450–463.

135.

Fregni

Orsati

Pedrosa

et al . Transcranial direct current stimulation of the prefrontal cortex modulates the desire for specific foods. Appetite 2008; 51: 34–41.

136.

Hare

Camerer

Rangel

Self-control in decision-making involves modulation of the vmPFC valuation system. Science 2009; 324: 646–648.

137.

Miller

Cohen

JD.

An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 167–202.

138.

Diana

The dopamine hypothesis of drug addiction and its potential therapeutic value. Front Psychiatry 2011; 2: 64.

139.

Doherty

Schier

Vena

et al . Medial prefrontal cortical dopamine responses during operant self-administration of sweetened ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2016; 40: 1662–1670.

140.

Uher

Yoganathan

Mogg

et al . Effect of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on food craving. Biol Psychiatry 2005; 58: 840–842.

141.

Barth

Rydin-Gray

Kose

et al . Food cravings and the effects of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation using an improved sham condition. Front Psychiatry 2011; 2: 9.

142.

Goldman

Borckardt

Frohman

et al . Prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) temporarily reduces food cravings and increases the self-reported ability to resist food in adults with frequent food craving. Appetite 2011; 56: 741–746.

143.

Kekic

McClelland

Campbell

et al . The effects of prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving and temporal discounting in women with frequent food cravings. Appetite 2014; 78: 55–62.

144.

Lapenta

Sierve

de Macedo

et al . Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates ERP-indexed inhibitory control and reduces food consumption. Appetite 2014; 83: 42–48.

145.

Lowe

Vincent

Hall

PA.

Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on food cravings and consumption: a meta-analytic review. Psychosom Med 2017; 79: 2–13.

146.

Montenegro

Okano

Cunha

et al . Prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation associated with aerobic exercise change aspects of appetite sensation in overweight adults. Appetite 2012; 58: 333–338.

147.

Gluck

Alonso-Alonso

Piaggi

et al . Neuromodulation targeted to the prefrontal cortex induces changes in energy intake and weight loss in obesity. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2015; 23: 2149–2156.

148.

Bravo

Poje

Perissinotti

et al . Transcranial direct current stimulation reduces food-craving and measures of hyperphagia behavior in participants with Prader-Willi syndrome. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2016; 171B: 266–275.

149.

Burgess

Sylvester

Morse

et al . Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord 2016; 49: 930–936.

150.

Ljubisavljevic

Maxood

Bjekic

et al . Long-term effects of repeated prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on food craving in normal and overweight young adults. Brain Stimul 2016; 9: 826–833.

151.

Hall

Vincent

Burhan

AM.

Non-invasive brain stimulation for food cravings, consumption, and disorders of eating: a review of methods, findings and controversies. Appetite 2017. pii: S0195-6663(16)30685-7.

152.

Ray

Sylvester

Osborn

et al . The critical role of cognitive-based trait differences in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) suppression of food craving and eating in frank obesity. Appetite 2017; 116: 568–574.

153.

Luzi

Ferrulli

Adamo

et al . Efficacy of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation on satiety and body weight. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Diabetes Association, 12 June 2016. New Orleans, Louisiana.

154.

Kamolz

Richter

Schmidtke

et al . Transcranial magnetic stimulation for comorbid depression in anorexia. Nervenarzt 2008; 79: 1071–1073.

155.

Van den Eynde

Guillaume

Broadbent

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. Eur Psychiatry 2013; 28: 98–101.

156.

Khedr

Elfetoh

Ali

et al . Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex improves anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2014; 32: 789–797.

157.

McClelland

Kekic

Bozhilova

et al . A randomised controlled trial of neuronavigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in anorexia nervosa. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0148606.

158.

McClelland

Kekic

Campbell

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment in enduring anorexia nervosa: a case series. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2016; 24: 157–163.

159.

Hausmann

Mangweth

Walpoth

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the double-blind treatment of a depressed patient suffering from bulimia nervosa: a case report. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2004; 7: 371–373.

160.

Gay

Jaussent

Sigaud

et al . A lack of clinical effect of high-frequency rTMS to dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on bulimic symptoms: a randomised, double-blind trial. Eur Eat Disord Rev 2016; 24: 474–481.

161.

Walpoth

Hoertnagl

Mangweth-Matzek

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in bulimia nervosa: preliminary results of a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled trial in female outpatients. Psychother Psychosom 2008; 77: 57–60.

162.

Van den Eynde

Broadbent

Guillaume

et al . Handedness, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and bulimic disorders. Eur Psychiatry 2012; 27: 290–293.

163.

Van den Eynde

Claudino

Mogg

et al . Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces cue-induced food craving in bulimic disorders. Biol Psychiatry 2010; 67: 793–795.

164.

Downar

Sankar

Giacobbe

et al . Unanticipated rapid remission of refractory bulimia nervosa, during high-dose repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex: a case report. Front Psychiatry 2012; 3: 30.

165.

Kekic

McClelland

Bartholdy

et al . Single-session transcranial direct current stimulation temporarily improves symptoms, mood, and self-regulatory control in bulimia nervosa: a randomised controlled trial. PLoS One 2017; 12: e0167606.

166.

Hamani

Richter

Schwalb

et al . Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review of the clinical literature. Neurosurgery 2005; 56: 1313–1321; discussion 1321–1314.

Neuromodulation for the treatment of eating disorders and obesity

Abstract

Keywords

Introduction

Neurobiology of eating behavior: homeostatic and reward pathways

Anatomical targets for obesity

Hypothalamus

Nucleus accumbens

Other targets for obesity

Clinical DBS trials for obesity

Hypothalamus

Nucleus accumbens

Anatomical targets for anorexia nervosa

Insula

Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens

Other targets for anorexia

Clinical DBS trials for anorexia nervosa

Ventral striatum/nucleus accumbens

Subgenual cingulate cortex

Bed nucleus of stria terminalis

Non-invasive brain stimulation for eating disorders

NIBS for obesity

NIBS for anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa

Conclusion

Footnotes

Funding

Conflict of interest statement

References