Abstract
Objective:
Clozapine is a second-generation antipsychotic used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Despite its effectiveness, clozapine is largely underused due to serious side effects such as leukopenia or neutropenia. We aimed to review whether to continue, discontinue or rechallenge clozapine treatment after such haematological side effects.
Methods:
We reviewed and summarized the literature on the use of clozapine, how to deal with its side effects, and suitable options in case of any haematological problems. Then, we described several cases successfully treated with clozapine and lithium after development of neutropenia or leukopenia
Results:
We present three patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. While they had demonstrated poor response to multiple antipsychotic trials, clozapine was started. Clozapine induced neutropenia; or leukopenia developed in some cases that was successfully reversed after lithium onset. Increased serious side effects related with coprescription of lithium and clozapine were not observed.
Conclusion:
Lithium increases neutrophil and total white blood cell count as a side effect that may be useful in patients who develop neutropenia or leukopenia while being treated with clozapine.
Introduction
Schizophrenia occurs worldwide and is among the most severe devastating mental disorders [Rado and Janicak, 2014]. This severe mental disorder affects 1% of the world population and is characterized by psychotic symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions or disorganized thinking and cognitive, affective and psychosocial impairment [Schultz and Andreasen, 1999]. Antipsychotic medication is the mainstay of pharmacological treatment in the acute phase, in the long-term maintenance therapy and in the prevention of relapse of schizophrenia [Thibaut, 2014]. Despite new-generation antipsychotic medications, one third of schizophrenic patients do not respond well to pharmacological interventions. Such patients are commonly labelled treatment-resistant schizophrenics [Sinclair and Adams, 2014].
Clozapine is known as the first ‘atypical’ or ‘ second-generation’ antipsychotic drug [Balda et al. 2015] that is effective on both the positive and negative symptoms of the disease and effective in 30–60% of schizophrenic patients resistant to common neuroleptics [Balibey et al. 2011]. It is mostly used for treatment-resistant schizophrenia [Lewis et al. 2006]. It is also effective in reduction of self-harm and suicidal behaviour in schizophrenia [Meltzer et al. 2003; Zarzar and McEvoy, 2013]. Despite its effectiveness, clozapine is largely underused for many and serious side effects including haematological (agranulocytosis, neutropenia), cardiac (myocarditis), nervous (seizure), metabolic (weight gain, metabolic syndrome, diabetes) and gastrointestinal (ileus, haematemesis, constipation) complications [Raja and Raja, 2014].
Agranulocytosis and neutropenia are life-threatening side effects of clozapine [Abanmy et al. 2014]. The incidence of agranulocytosis is about 1%, and of neutropenia about 3%, with the highest risk within the first 6–18 weeks of treatment [Atkin et al. 1996]. The neutrophil counts increase or decrease in parallel to leukocyte counts, and the evolution of leukocytes reflects the evolution of neutrophils [Bourin et al. 2001]. Mild leukopenia [white blood cell (WBC) count of 3500–3000/mm3 or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 2000–1500/mm3 of blood], moderate leukopenia (WBC count of 3000–2000/mm3, ANC 1500–1000/mm3), or severe leukopenia (WBC count < 2000/mm3, ANC < 1000/mm3) are descriptions used for defining the severity of leukopenia. Agranulocytosis is defined as ANC ⩽ 500/mm3 [Balda et al. 2015]. Neutropenia is defined as neutrophil count between 500/mm3 and 1500/mm3. If neutropenia occurs during treatment, clozapine use must be interrupted or discontinued [Nykiel et al. 2010].
The initiation of clozapine treatment requires WBC count to be >3500/mm3. The treatment decisions are based on normative cutoff WBC values (3600–9500/mm3) derived from white populations. Normative standards for WBC and ANC measurements do not take into account ethnic differences. Ethnic differences such as benign ethnic neutropenia (BEN) should be considered, either in the initiation of clozapine or in the evaluation of cases of clozapine-related blood dyscrasias [Bray, 2008]. BEN is a familial condition which is prevalent in Afro-Caribbean families and in some Middle Eastern families. Normal WBC levels in Afro-Caribbean families generally range from 2800 to 9500/mm3. This condition due to ethnic differences becomes important to distinguish between clozapine-induced neutropenia and BEN [Kelly et al. 2007].
The mechanism of clozapine-induced agranulocytosis and neutropenia is not clear [Dunk et al. 2006; Ng, 2014], but genetic factors, as well as immunological and toxic mechanism may play an important role [Załuska and Gajewska, 1995; Yağcıoğlu et al. 2011]. The development of severe neutropenia and agranulocytosis are a substantial hazard in the administration of clozapine, but serious and potentially life-threatening adverse effects can be reduced, or managed, by monitoring the WBC count before the patients began clozapine treatment, weekly for the first 18 weeks, and then monthly throughout the duration of therapy [Alvir et al. 1993]. It was reported that the clozapine patient-monitoring system has successfully reduced the death rate by early detection of blood disorders and rapid cessation of clozapine use [Drew, 2013], and has resulted in a lowered incidence of agranulocytosis [Fitzsimons et al. 2005].
We present a series of three White inpatients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia who were hospitalized and treated in the mid regions of Turkey. While they had demonstrated poor response to multiple antipsychotic trials, clozapine was started. Clozapine-induced neutropenia or leukopenia developed in some cases that was successfully reversed after lithium onset. We discussed the details of the treatment and obtained written informed consent from the patients and from their first-degree relatives or spouses.
Case reports
In all patients, blood tests were repeated at least three or four times on consecutive days after the development of blood dyscrasias while deciding whether to continue or discontinue clozapine treatment. After deciding to continue clozapine treatment, patients’ blood parameters were controlled closely and they continued being followed up as outpatients. Any additional episodes of neutropenia were noted during the observation periods of patients.
Discussion
The risk of haematological side effects is still the major limitation of clozapine treatment. To reduce this risk, monitoring WBC count might be useful before initiating clozapine treatment and regularly throughout therapy duration for identifying any haematological abnormalities [Alvir et al. 1993; Raveendranathan et al. 2013]. The treatment decisions require baseline WBC count to be >3500/mm3. Early administration of growth factors or lithium may be useful for increasing the WBC in patients with low baseline counts who would benefit from treatment with clozapine [Lambertenghi Deliliers, 2000].
According to the guidelines, discontinuation of clozapine is required when WBC count falls below 3000/mm3 and ANC falls below 1500/mm3 [Dunk et al. 2006]. However, some treatment options must be considered when leukopenia or neutropenia occur: drug suspension until WBC counts return to normal and then drug reintroduction [Silvestrini and Arcangeli, 2000; Ghaznavi et al. 2008]; add-on filgrastim, a granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during clozapine rechallenge [Hägg et al. 2003; Huguet et al. 2013; Khan et al. 2013]; or utilization of lithium in conjunction with clozapine [Pinninti et al. 2010; Suraweera et al. 2014]. If the WBC count continues to fall despite growth factors or lithium treatment, consideration should be given to discontinuing clozapine. When agranulocytosis occurs, consultation with a haematologist is required.
Rechallenge with clozapine is an off-label process when haematological side effects occur. However, rechallenge is sometimes considered when clozapine is the only effective treatment and drug discontinuation may lead to psychotic exacerbation [Ahn et al. 2004]. Patients who are unresponsive to other antipsychotics and remain significantly distressed with poor quality of life and psychotic symptoms should be considered for clozapine usage in combination with any suitable offered agent when neutropenia or leukopenia occur. The outcome of rechallenge was considered favourable when the risks and benefits of rechallenge with clozapine was assessed carefully [Dunk et al. 2006; Manu et al. 2012]. Although add-on G-CSF or lithium are favourable therapeutic options when clozapine is rechallenged, physicians should be aware of the potential dangers of recurrent blood dyscrasias [Hazewinkel et al. 2013].
In case of neutropenia, coprescribing of lithium is supported by published reports [Ghaznavi et al. 2008; Kanaan and Kerwin, 2006]. A retrospective case analysis that presented all patients who had a clozapine rechallenge with lithium coprescribed reported the utility and safety of lithium in clozapine rechallenge. The rate (4%) of a second neutropenic episode or agranulocytosis while undergoing the rechallenge with lithium coprescription was reported as significantly lower than the rate (21.2%) of a second neutropenic episode or agranulocytosis while undergoing the rechallenge without lithium coprescription [Kanaan and Kerwin, 2006].
Some limitations regarding lithium use should be considered. First, there are concerns that lithium might mask impending agranulocytosis, making the combination potentially dangerous [Whiskey and Taylor, 2007]. Second, clozapine–lithium combination might be associated with an increased risk of neurological symptoms, weight gain and metabolic abnormalities [Brunoni et al. 2008].
The mechanism by which lithium raises the WBC count is not completely understood [Palominao et al. 2010]. Direct stem-cell stimulation, an increase in granulocyte production, stimulation of cytokines, redistribution of demarginated leukocytes, and increased cortisol production have all been suggested as putative theories [Whiskey and Taylor, 2007]. There is no defined serum level for neutrophilia, but a minimum lithium serum level of 0.4 mmol/l may be required [Blier et al. 1998]. In most of the literature, the combination of clozapine and lithium treatment is reported as well tolerated and effective when administered within an optimal lithium dose range (300–900 mg/day) with lithium serum levels between 0.4 and 0.9 mmol/l [Bender et al. 2004; Kanaan and Kerwin, 2006; Pinninti et al. 2010].
In our own experience, the patients responded well to clozapine treatment, in terms of clinical improvements in psychotic symptoms and reduction of suicide. However, over the course of treatment with those taking clozapine, neutropenia or leukopenia occurred. We considered continuing the clozapine treatment of two patients in conjunction with lithium, while their blood neutrophil cell counts were in the range of 1450–1860/mm3 (mild–moderate leukopenia), and stopping clozapine treatment of the other due to a neutrophil cell count of 950/mm3 (severe leukopenia). Lithium treatment was added for increasing WBC counts to all. We chose not to use G-CSF because of potential side-effect limitations: bone pain, autoimmune disorders, allergic reactions, and the possible relationship between the use of G-CSF and the development of acute myeloid leukaemia [Tigue et al. 2007], as well as its high cost. G-CSF should be administered within 48 h with an optimal indication (ANC < 500/mm3). Requirement of daily or weekly subcutaneous injections restricts prescription of G-CSF [Hägg et al. 2003].
The three patients presented in this report support previous reports about lithium coprescription with clozapine as a well-tolerated and successful strategy when neutropenia and leukopenia occur. We did not observe any increase in serious adverse effects related with coprescription of lithium and clozapine.
The evidence is limited to retrospective case-analysis reports. Further studies are required to investigate continuing, discontinuing and rechallenging clozapine treatment after neutropenia or leukopenia occur.
Footnotes
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
