This commentary takes ‘fallen-below’ seriously but hesitates and points to a need to develop some spatially enabled building blocks to advance foundational liveability thinking. Placing and scaling foundational liveability, first, a geographical perspective needs to be more explicitly stated as a point of theoretical and political entry. Second, place needs to be conceived relationally but with coherence for community collaboration to develop foundational economy citizens. Third, to avoid spatial particularism, foundational liveability needs to demonstrate how alliances and citizenship loyalties can be mobilised as part of a progressive scalar strategy without falling into the trap of localism.
AndersonBSecorAJ (2025) The Politics of Feeling: Populism, Progressivism, Liberalism. London: Goldsmiths Press.
2.
BarberaFJonesIR (2020) Introduction. In: BarberaFJonesIR (eds) The Foundational Economy and Citizenship: Comparative Perspectives on Civil Repair. Bristol: Policy Press, 1–6.
3.
BärnthalerR (2022) In search of articulation: A framework to empower transformative innovations. European Journal of Spatial Development19(4): 1–24.
4.
BassensDFroudJJohalS, et al. (2025) Geography, the foundational economy, and the fallen-below. Dialogues in Human Geography. 10.1177/20438206251388515.
5.
ButtimerA (1976) Grasping the dynamism of the lifeworld. Annales of the Association of American Geographers66(2): 277–292.
6.
CalafatiLFroudJHaslamC, et al. (2023) When Nothing Works: From Cost of Living to Foundational Liveability. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
7.
CrispREvenhuisEGreenA, et al. (2025) Implementing alternative economic development approaches: The possibilities and limits of ‘pick and mix’. Journal of City Climate Policy and Economy4(2). https://utppublishing.com/doi/pdf/10.3138/jccpe-2025-0005.
8.
CrispRWaiteDGreenA, et al. (2024) ‘Beyond GDP’ in cities: Assessing alternative approaches in urban economic development. Urban Studies61(7): 1209–1229.
9.
DeutzOJonasAEGNewsholmeA, et al. (2024) The role of place in the development of a circular economy: A critical analysis of potential for social redistribution in Hull, UK. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society17(3): 551–564.
10.
DorlingD (2025) What the Future Looks Like to Most People: and What We can Do about It. London: Verso.
11.
DuncanSGoodwinM (1988) The Local State and Uneven Development: Behind the Local Government Crisis. Cambridge: Polity.
12.
Foundational Economy Collective (2018) The Foundational Economy: The Infrastructure of Everyday Life. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
13.
Gibson-GrahamJ-K (1996) The End of Capitalism (As We Knew It): A Feminist Critique of Political Economy. Minneapolis: University of Minesota Press.
14.
GoodwinMJonesMJonesR (2017) Rescaling the State: Devolution and the Geographies of Economic Governance. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
15.
HarveyD (1995) Militant particularism and global ambition: The conceptual politics of place, space, and environment in the work of Raymond Williams. Social Text42: 69–98.
16.
JonesMWoodsM (2013) New localities. Regional Studies47(1): 29–42.
17.
LefebvreH (1971) Everyday Life in the Modern World. London: Allen Lane.
18.
MasseyD (2005) For Space. London: Sage.
19.
MerrimanP (2022) Space. London: Routledge.
20.
MillerB (2013) Spatialities of mobilization: Building and breaking relationships. In: NichollsWBeaumontJMillerB (eds) Spaces of Contention: Spatialities and Social Movements. London: Routledge, 285–298.
21.
PolanyiK (1957) The Great Transformation: The Political Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
22.
Rodríguez-PoseA (2018) The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society11(1): 189–209.
23.
Rodríguez-PoseADijkstraLPoelmanH (2024) The geography of EU discontent and the regional development trap. Economic Geography100(3): 213–245.
24.
RussellB (2019) Beyond the local trap: New municipalism and the rise of the fearless cities. Antipode51(3): 989–1010.
25.
RussellBBeelDJonesIR, et al. (2022) Placing the foundational economy: An emerging discourse for post-neoliberal economic development. Environment and Planning A54(6): 1069–1085.
26.
SaviniF (2025) The circular economy is over: The scalar politics of circular production. Urban Studies. 10.1177/00420980251383341.
27.
SchafranASmithMNHallS (2020) The Spatial Contract: A New Politics of Provision for an Urbanized Planet. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
28.
SeamonD (1979) A Geography of the Lifeworld. London: Croom Helm.
29.
SwyngedouwE (1997) Excluding the other: The production of scale and scaled politics. In: LeeRWillsJ (eds) Geographies of Economies. London: Routledge, 551–581.
30.
ThompsonMCatorCBeelD, et al. (2024) Amsterdam’s circular economy at a world-ecological crossroads: Postcapitalist degrowth or the next regime of capital accumulation?Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society17: 535–550.
31.
TomaneyJBlackmanMNatarajanL, et al. (2024) Remaking Social Infrastructure in ‘Left Behind’ Places. London: Taylor & Francis.
32.
UitermarkJ (2015) The particularities of territory. Territory, Politics, Governance3(1): 1–6.
33.
VandeventerJSLloverasJWarnabyG (2024) Seeking organizational geographies: A multidimensional spatial analysis of everyday organizing. Organization Studies45(8): 1133–1160.
34.
WhiteheadM (2005) Between the marvellous and the mundane: Everyday life in the socialist city and the politics of the environment. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space23: 273–294.
35.
WoodsM (2024) Defining place and engaging communities in research’ Wales Innovation Network Webinar on Place Matters: The Role of Place in Shaping Research, 13th November.
