In recent decades the world has witnessed an unparalleled growth of philanthropic initiatives and institutions that has proven inextricable from the vast accumulation and concentration of wealth on a global scale. Echoing recent calls for geographers to study philanthropy, this paper seeks to advance a critical geographical understanding of globalising philanthropy. Inspired by geographical scholarship on relational thinking, the paper frames the varied manifestations of contemporary philanthropy as a ‘philanthropic complex’ in order to understand philanthropy through central themes of relationality, intermediation and stabilisation. Advancing theories of philanthropy by characterising the complex's geographical unevenness and political functions of depoliticisation, the paper closes by outlining avenues in which relational thinking about philanthropy can advance geographical theories of elites and global development.
AcutoMLeffelB (2021) Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks. Urban Studies58(9): 1758–1774.
2.
AnderssonLCalvanoL (2015) Perceived mobility of impact: Global elites and the bono effect. Critical Perspectives on International Business11(2): 122–136.
3.
ArnoveRF (eds) (1980) Philanthropy and Cultural Imperialism: The Foundations at Home and Abroad. Boston, MA: G.K. Hall.
BrownSRosierM (2023) COVID-19 vaccine apartheid and the failure of global cooperation. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations25(3): 535–554.
BurnsR (2019) New frontiers of philanthro-capitalism: Digital technologies and humanitarianism. Antipode51(4): 1101–1122.
20.
ButlerTLeesL (2006) Super-gentrification in Barnsbury, London: Globalization and gentrifying global elites at the neighbourhood level. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers31(4): 467–487.
21.
CassidyJ (2015) Mark Zuckerberg and the Rise of Philanthrocapitalism. The New Yorker, 2 December. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/mark-zuckerberg-and-the-rise-of-philanthrocapitalism (accessed 9 September 2019).
22.
ChancelLPikettyTSaezE, et al(2021) World Inequality Report 2022. World Inequality Lab. Available at: https://wir2022.wid.world (accessed 9 December 2021).
CohenD (2021) Philanthropy to the rescue? Detroit’s schools and urban policymaking under austerity. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space39(7): 1547–1566.
25.
CohenDRosenmanE (2020) From the School Yard to the Conservation Area: Impact Investment across the Nature/Social Divide. Antipode52(5): 1259–1285.
CollinsCFlanneryH (2020) Gilded Giving 2020: How Wealth Inequality Distorts Philanthropy and Imperils Democracy. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies. Available at: https://inequality.org/great-divide/gilded-giving-2020/ (accessed 11 December 2020).
28.
CollinsCFlanneryH (2022) Gilded Giving 2022: How Wealth Inequality Distorts Philanthropy and Imperils Democracy. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies. Available at: https://inequality.org/great-divide/gilded-giving-2022/ (accessed 10 August 2023).
29.
CollinsCOcampoOPaslaskiS (2020) Billionaire Bonanza 2020: Wealth Windfalls, Tumbling Taxes and Pandemic Profiteers. Washington, DC: Institute for Policy Studies. Available at: https://ips-dc.org/billionaire-bonanza-2020/ (accessed 28 October 2020).
30.
de ForestJ (2008)Conservatism goes to college: The role of philanthropic foundations in the rise of conservative student networks. In: Geiger RL (ed) Perspectives on the History of Higher Education, vol. 26, 2007.New York: Routledge,103–127.
31.
DesaiRMKharasH (2008) The California consensus: Can private aid end global poverty?Survival50(4): 155–168.
32.
DialloRN (2015) Conservation philanthropy and the shadow of state power in Gorongosa National Park, Mozambique. Conservation & Society13(2): 119–128.
33.
DickenP (2004) Geographers and ‘globalization’: (Yet) another missed boat?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers29(1): 5–26.
34.
EikenberryAMMirabellaRM (2018) Extreme philanthropy: Philanthrocapitalism, effective altruism, and the discourse of neoliberalism. PS: Political Science & Politics51(1): 43–47.
35.
FaroukyN (2016) The state of Arab philanthropy and the case for change. Development in Practice26(5): 637–645.
36.
FisherD (1980) American Philanthropy and the social sciences in Britain, 1919–1939; the reproduction of a conservative ideology. Sociological Review28(2): 277–315.
37.
FourcadeMKluttzDN (2020) A Maussian bargain: Accumulation by gift in the digital economy. Big Data & SocietyJanuary–June: 1–16.
38.
FuentenebroPAcutoM (2022) The gifted city: Setting a research agenda for philanthropy and urban governance. Urban Studies59(9): 1944–1955.
39.
GaborDBrooksS (2017) The digital revolution in financial inclusion: International development in the fintech era. New Political Economy22(4): 423–436.
40.
GlücklerJRiesM (2012) Why being there is not enough: Organized proximity in place-based philanthropy. The Service Industries Journal32(4): 515–529.
41.
GlücklerJSaursanaL (2022) The geography of giving in the philanthropic field. In: Glückler J Meyer H-D and Suarsana L (eds) Knowledge and Civil Society. Springer, 179–208.
42.
HarrowJJungT (2020) The European philanthropy manifesto: ‘clearly needed and a very good thing’?Voluntary Sector Review11(3): 383–394.
43.
HartG (2006) Denaturalizing dispossession: Critical ethnography in the age of resurgent imperialism. Antipode36(5): 977–1004.
44.
HartG (2018) Relational comparison revisited: Marxist postcolonial geographies in practice. Progress in Human Geography42(3): 371–394.
45.
HarveyCMacleanMGordonJ, et al. (2011) Andrew Carnegie and the foundations of contemporary entrepreneurial philanthropy. Business History53(3): 425–450.
46.
HarveyEA (2013) ‘Layered networks’: Imperial philanthropy in Birmingham and Sydney, 1860–1914. The Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History41(1): 120–142.
47.
HayIMullerS (2012) That tiny, stratospheric apex that owns most of the world – Exploring geographies of the super-rich. Geographical Research50(1): 75–88.
48.
HayIMullerS (2014) Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: Towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography38(5): 635–653.
49.
HolmesG (2012) Biodiversity for billionaires: Capitalism, conservation and the role of philanthropy in saving/selling nature. Development and Change43(1): 185–203.
50.
HurdHMasonCPinchS (1998) The geography of corporate philanthropy in the United Kingdom. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy16: 3–24.
51.
GilmoreRW (2009) In the shadow of the shadow state. In: Incite! Women of Color Against Violence (eds) The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex. Boston, MA: South End Press, 41–52.
JafriJ (2019) When billions meet trillions: Impact investing and shadow banking in Pakistan. Review of International Political Economy26(3): 520–544.
55.
JohnsonP (2018) Global Philanthropy Report: Perspectives on the Global Foundation Sector. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School. Available at: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/cpl/publications/global-philanthropy-report-perspectives-global-foundation-sector (accessed 24 November 2020).
56.
JosephsonM (1934) The Robber Barons: The Great American Capitalists, 1861-1901. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
57.
JungTHarrowJ (2019) Providing foundations: Philanthropy, global policy, and administration. In: StoneDMoloneyK (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Global Policy and Transnational Administration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 619–637.
58.
Kohl-ArenasE (2011) Governing poverty amidst plenty: Participatory development and private philanthropy. Geography Compass5(11): 811–824.
59.
KootSFletcherR (2020) Popular philanthrocapitalism? The potential and pitfalls of online empowerment in “free” nature 2.0 initiatives. Environmental Communication14(3): 287–299.
60.
KuldovaT (2017) Forcing “good” and the legitimation of informal power: Philanthrocapitalism and artistic nationalism among the Indian business elites. International Quarterly for Asian Studies48(1–2): 55–75.
KumarA (2018) Pragmatic and paradoxical philanthropy: Tatas’ gift giving and scientific development in India. Development and Change49(6): 1422–1446.
64.
KumarABrooksS (2021) Bridges, platforms and satellites: Theorizing the power of global philanthropy in international development. Economy and Society50(2): 322–345.
65.
LambertDLesterA (2004) Geographies of colonial philanthropy. Progress in Human Geography28(3): 320–341.
66.
LeitnerHSheppardEWebberS, et al. (2018) Globalizing urban resilience. Urban Geography39(8): 1276–1284.
67.
LewSWójcikD (2010) The variegated cultures of philanthropy: National and corporate impacts on private foundation governance. Competition and Change14(3-4): 152–175.
68.
LipmanP (2015) Capitalizing on crisis: Venture philanthropy’s colonial project to remake urban education. Critical Studies in Education56(2): 241–258.
MallinFM-AStolzDCThompsonBS, et al. (2019) In oceans we trust: Conservation, philanthropy, and the political economy of the Phoenix Islands Protected Area. Marine Policy107 (103421): 1–12.
71.
MarshallNDawleySPikeA, et al. (2018) Geographies of corporate philanthropy: The Northern Rock Foundation. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 266–287.
72.
MasseyD (1995) Spatial Divisions of Labour: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, 2nd ed.Basingstoke: Macmillan.
73.
MayerJ (2016) Dark Money: The Hidden History of Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. New York: Doubleday.
74.
McGoeyL (2012) Philanthrocapitalism and its critics. Poetics40: 185–199.
75.
McGoeyL (2015) No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. London: Verso Books.
McGoeyLThielD (2018) Charismatic violence and the sanctification of the super-rich. Economy and Society47(1): 111–134.
78.
MediavillaJGarcia-AriasJ (2019) Philanthrocapitalism as a Neoliberal (Development Agenda) artefact: philanthropic discourse and hegemony in (financing for) international development. Globalizations16(6): 857–875.
79.
MitchellK (2016) Celebrity humanitarianism, transnational emotion and the rise of neoliberal citizenship. Global Networks16(3): 288–306.
80.
MitchellKSparkeM (2016) The New Washington Consensus: Millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode48(3): 724–729.
81.
MonteroS (2020) Leveraging Bogotá: Sustainable development, global philanthropy and the rise of urban solutionism. Urban Studies57(11): 2263–2228.
82.
MoranM (2013) Global philanthropy. In: WeissTGWilkinsonR (eds) International Organization and Global Governance. London: Routledge, 372–384.
83.
MoreyM (2021) White philanthropy: Carnegie Corporation’s An American Dilemma and the making of a white world order. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
NallyDTaylorS (2015) The politics of self-help: The Rockefeller Foundation, philanthropy and the ‘long’. Green Revolution. Political Geography49: 51–63.
86.
National Philanthropic Trust (2022) 2022 Donor-Advised Fund Report. Jenkintown, PA: National Philanthropic Trust. Available at: https://www.nptrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/2022-DAF-Report.pdf (accessed 6 April 2023).
OsellaFStirratRWidgerT (2015) Charity, philanthropy and development in Colombo, Sri Lanka. In: MorvaridiB (eds) New Philanthropy and Social Justice: Debating the Conceptual and Policy Discourse. Bristol: Policy Press, 137–156.
95.
ParmarI (2012) Foundation networks and american hegemony. European Journal of American Studies7(1): 1–29.
96.
PatilL (2021) Disaster philanthropy: Exploring the power and influence in education development during pandemic times. International Journal of Educational Development81: 1–11.
97.
PeckJ (2017) Offshore: Exploring the Worlds of Global Outsourcing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98.
PerkinsRNeumayerE (2013) The ties that bind: The role of migrants in the uneven geography of international telephone traffic. Global Networks13(1): 79–100.
99.
PillM (2020) The austerity governance of Baltimore’s neighborhoods: “The conversation may have changed but the systems aren’t changing”. Journal of Urban Affairs42(1): 143–158.
PospíšilováT (2014) Transnational philanthropy and nationalism: The early years of Central European University. Monde(s)2(6): 129–146.
102.
PowCP (2011) Living it up: Super-rich enclave and transnational elite urbanism in Singapore. Geoforum42(3): 382–393.
103.
ReckhowS (2016) More than patrons: How foundations fuel policy change and backlash. PS: Political Science & Politics49(3): 449–454.
104.
ReichR (2005) A failure of philanthropy: American charity shortchanges the poor, and public policy is partly to blame. Stanford Social Innovation Review 3(4): 24–33.
105.
ReichR (2018) Just Giving: Why Philanthropy is Failing Democracy and How it Can do Better. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
106.
RobinsonJ (2014) World cities, or a world of ordinary cities? In: MiraftabFKudvaN (eds) Cities of the Global South Reader. New York: Routledge, 66–72.
107.
RoelofsJ (2015) How foundations exercise power. American Journal of Economics and Sociology74(4): 654–675.
RooneyPM (2019) Where Have All the Donors Gone? The Continued Decline of the Small Donor and the Growth of Megadonors. Nonprofit Quarterly, 4 December. Available at: https://nonprofitquarterly.org/where-have-all-the-donors-gone-the-continued-decline-of-the-small-donor-and-the-growth-of-megadonors/ (accessed 11 November 2021).
110.
RosenmanE (2019a) Capital and conscience: poverty management and the financialization of good intentions in the San Francisco Bay Area. Urban Geography40(8): 1124–1147.
111.
RosenmanE (2019b) The geographies of social finance: Poverty regulation through the ‘invisible heart’ of markets. Progress in Human Geography43(1): 141–162.
112.
RosenmanE (2024) From the racialization of finance to the financing of anti-racism: Tracing the US financial industry’s investments in closing the racial wealth gap. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space56(1): 253–269.
113.
RoyA (2010) Poverty Capital: Microfinance and the Making of Development. London: Routledge.
114.
SchervishP (2003) Hyperagency and high-tech donors: A new theory of the new philanthropists. Chestnut Hill, Mass.: Social Welfare Research Institute, Boston College, 14 November. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:104107 (accessed 5 February 2024).
VogelA (2006) Who’s making global civil society: Philanthropy and US empire in world society. The British Journal of Sociology57(4): 635–655.
125.
WebberSLeitnerHSheppardE (2021) Wheeling out urban resilience: Philanthrocapitalism, marketization, and local practice. Annals of the American Association of Geographers111(2): 343–363.
126.
WolchJRGeigerRK (1985) Corporate philanthropy: Implications for urban research and public policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy3: 349–369.
127.
WolpertJReinerT (1984) The philanthropy marketplace. Economic Geography60(3): 197–209.
