Teo et al.'s (2024) article effectively highlights that producing new narratives or imaginations is key to developing a deeper understanding of both Chinese cities and those of other contexts. However, certain ‘information cocoons’ still require closer consideration, such as the lack of attention given to narratives produced within the state territory of China, over-reliance on political economic analysis, and the impact of disciplinary boundaries.
BeauregardRA (2012a) Planning with things. Journal of Planning Education and Research32(2): 182–190.
2.
BeauregardRA (2012b) What theorists do. Urban Geography33(4): 474–487.
3.
BrennerN (2019) New Urban Spaces: Urban Theory and the Scale Question. New York: Oxford University Press.
4.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
5.
PeckJ (2017) Transatlantic city, part 1: Conjunctural urbanism. Urban Studies54(1): 4–30.
6.
RobinsonJ (2016) Comparative urbanism: new geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40(1): 187–199.
7.
RoyAOngA (2011) Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Chichester, West Sussex; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
8.
SheppardELeitnerHMaringantiA (2013) Provincializing global urbanism: A manifesto. Urban Geography34(7): 893–900.
9.
SunsteinCR (2008) Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.
TeoSChungCWangZ (2024) Theorising with urban China: Methodological and tactical experiments for a more global urban studies. Dialogues in Human Geography14(3): 419–438.
11.
TurnerB (2004) Edward W. Said: Overcoming orientalism. Theory, Culture & Society21(1): 173–177.
12.
ZouYZhaoW (2018) Making a new area in Xiong’an: Incentives and challenges of China’s ‘Millennium Plan’. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences88: 45–48.
