This commentary responds to ‘Diversifying the compact city’ (Haarstad, Kjærås, Røe, and Tveiten, 2023) by introducing the elemental thinking of urban air rights. I argue that the analytical tool of ‘following air rights’ can contribute to the proposed research agenda by connecting the sociotechnical operations of urban policy tools, metabolic flows across multiple urban sites, and the actionable potential of antagonism and commoning.
AdeyP (2013) Coming up for air: Comfort, conflict and the air of the megacity. In: BrighentiAM (eds) Urban Interstices: The Aesthetics and the Politics of the In-Between. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 103–118.
2.
Castán BrotoV (2022) Splintering urbanism and climate breakdown. Journal of Urban Technology29(1): 87–93.
3.
ChenH-Y (2018) Urban air rights as market devices: Exploring financialization in Taipei Metropolitan Area. PhD Thesis, Durham University, UK.
4.
ChenH-Y (2020) Cashing in on the sky: Financialization and urban air rights in the Taipei metropolitan area. Regional Studies54(2): 198–208.
5.
CookI (2004) Follow the thing: Papaya. Antipode36: 642–664.
6.
EngelmannSMcCormackD (2021) Elemental worlds: Specificities, exposures, alchemies. Progress in Human Geography45(6): 1419–1439.
7.
FeigenbaumAKanngieserA (2015) For a politics of atmospheric governance. Dialogues in Human Geography5(1): 80–84.
8.
GhertnerDA (2020) Airpocalypse: Distributions of life amidst Delhi’s polluted airs. Public Culture32(1): 133–162.
9.
Gibson-GrahamJK (2014) Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Current Anthropology55(S9): S147–S153.
10.
Gibson-GrahamJKCameronJHealyS (2016) Commoning as a postcapitalist politics. In: AminAHowellP (eds) Releasing the Commons: Rethinking the Futures of the Commons. London: Routledge, 192–212.
11.
GilbertE (2011) Following the thing: Credit. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29: 1085–1088.
12.
GrahamS (2015) Life support: The political ecology of urban air. City19(2–3): 192–215.
13.
HaarstadHKjæråsKRøePG, et al. (2023) Diversifying the compact city: A renewed agenda for geographical research. Dialogues in Human Geography 13(1): 5–24.
14.
HarrisA (2015) Vertical urbanisms: Opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 601–620.
15.
JacksonMFanninM (2011) Letting geography fall where it may – aerographies address the elemental. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space29(3): 435–444.
16.
JamiesonW (2021) For granular geography. Dialogues in Human Geography11(2): 275–293.
LiongJTLeitnerHSheppardE, et al. (2020) Space grabs: Colonizing the vertical city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research44(6): 1072–1082.
NethercoteMHorneR (2016) Ordinary vertical urbanisms: City apartments and the everyday geographies of high-rise families. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space48(8): 1581–1598.
21.
PowCP (2017) Sensing visceral urban politics and metabolic exclusion in a Chinese neighbourhood. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42(2): 260–273.
22.
RubinMTodesAHarrisonP, et al. (eds) (2020) Densifying the City? Global Cases and Johannesburg. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
23.
ShenJWuF (2020) Paving the way to growth: Transit-oriented development as a financing instrument for Shanghai’s post-suburbanization. Urban Geography41(7): 1010–1032.
24.
ShihMShiehL (2020) Negotiating density and financing public goods in Vancouver and new Taipei city: A development rights perspective. Planning Practice & Research35(4): 380–395.
25.
StrebelI (2011) The living building: Towards a geography of maintenance work. Social & Cultural Geography12(3): 243–262.
26.
Touati-MorelA (2015) Hard and soft densification policies in the Paris city-region. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39(3): 603–612.
27.
ZeeJ (2021) Continent in Dust: Experiments in a Chinese Weather System. Oakland. California: University of California Press.
