This article critically reflects on contemporary discussions of human–nonhuman relations and their consequences for ecological politics. Recent critiques push back against popular ‘nonhuman turn’ appeals to ‘decentre’ humans and downplay distinctions between humans and nonhumans. The article seeks to both extend and nuance these critiques by emphasising how uneven developments from colonial to digital platform capitalism have intensified historical processes of alienation between humans and the rest of nature. This focus contextualises the nonhuman turn as a response to increasingly alienated forms of entanglement, which may hamper rather than enable challenging contemporary forms of domination. To address this, two conceptual shifts are proposed. First, a shift away from ‘decentring the human’ to a dialectics between more-than-human and ‘less-than-human’. This move emphasises how forms of capitalist domination continue to diminish (certain) humans and nonhumans and how challenging this requires pivoting between de- and recentring humans where needed. Second, a shift from ‘more-than-human’ to ‘more-than-life’, to emphasise how through extremely uneven histories of capitalist development the intensification of alienation has led to growing tensions between ontological relationality and epistemological and practical distinctions.
AndersonK (2014) Mind over matter? On decentring the human in human geography. Cultural Geographies21(1): 3–18.
2.
ArboledaM (2017) Revitalizing science and technology studies: A Marxian critique of more-than-human geographies. Society and Space35(2): 360–378.
3.
BakkerKRittsM (2018) Smart Earth: A meta-review and implications for environmental governance. Global Environmental Change52: 201–211.
4.
BaruaM (2017) Nonhuman labour, encounter value, spectacular accumulation: The geographies of a lively commodity. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers42: 274–288.
5.
BaruaM (2019) Animating capital: Work, commodities, circulation. Progress in Human Geography43(4): 650–669.
6.
BattistoniA (2017) Bringing in the work of nature: From natural capital to hybrid labor. Political Theory45(1): 5–31.
7.
Bawaka Country et al. (2016) Co-becoming Bawaka: Towards a relational understanding of place/space. Progress in Human Geography40(4): 455–475.
8.
BennetJ (2010) Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
9.
BiroA (2005) Denaturalizing Ecological Politics: Alienation From Nature From Rousseau to the Frankfurt School and Beyond. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
10.
BiroA (2011) Ecological crisis and the culture industry thesis. In: BiroA (ed), Critical Ecologies. The Frankfurt School and the Contemporary Environmental Crises. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, pp. 229–252.
11.
BonneuillCFressozJB (2016) The Shock of the Anthropocene. The Earth, History and Us. London: Verso.
12.
BraidottiR (2013) The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
13.
BraunB (2015) New materialisms and neoliberal natures. Antipode47(1): 1–14.
14.
BüscherB (2021) The Truth About Nature. Environmentalism in the Era of Post-Truth Politics and Platform Capitalism. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
15.
BüscherBFletcherR (2020) The Conservation Revolution. Radical Ideas for Saving Nature Beyond the Anthropocene. London: Verso.
16.
CarolanM (2005) Society, biology, and ecology: Bringing nature back into sociology’s disciplinary narrative through critical realism. Organization & Environment18: 393–421.
17.
CastreeN (2002) False anthitheses? Marxism, nature and actor-networks. Antipode34(1): 111–146.
18.
CochraneA (2018) Should Animals Have Political Rights?Cambridge: Polity Press.
19.
CollardR (2014) Putting animals back together, taking commodities apart. Annals of the American Geographers104(1): 151–165.
20.
CollardRDempseyJ (2013) Life for sale? The politics of lively commodities. Environment and Planning A45: 2682–2699.
21.
ColombinoAGiaccariaP (2016) Dead liveness/living deadness: Thresholds of non-human life and death in biocapitalism. Society and Space34(6): 1044–1062.
22.
EriksenT (2016) Overheating. An Anthropology of Accelerated Change. London: Pluto.
23.
FeolaG (2019) Degrowth and the unmaking of capitalism: Beyond ‘decolonization of the imaginary’. ACME18(4): 977–997.
24.
FosterJB (2016) Marxism in the Anthropocene: Dialectic rifts on the left. International Critical Thought6(3): 393–421.
25.
GillespieKCollardR (2017) Critical Animal Geographies. Politics, Intersections and Hierarchies in a Multispecies World. London: Routledge.
26.
GinnF (2014) Sticky lives: Slugs, detachment and more-than-human ethics in the garden. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39: 532–544.
27.
GiraudE (2019) What Comes After Entanglement? Activism, Anthropocentrism, and an Ethics of Exclusion. Durham: Duke University Press.
28.
GorzA (1989) Critique of Instrumental Reason. London: Verso.
29.
GrusinR (2015) The Nonhuman Turn. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
30.
HarawayD (2016) Staying With the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
31.
HarveyD (1996) Justice, Nature & the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
32.
HarveyD (2006) Spaces of Global Capitalism. Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development. London: Verso.
33.
HornborgA (2017a) Dithering while the planet burns: Anthropologists’ approaches to the Anthropocene. Reviews in Anthropology46(2–3): 61–77.
34.
HornborgA (2017b) Artifacts have consequences, not agency: Toward a critical theory of global environmental history. European Journal of Social Theory20(1): 95–110.
35.
HubbardPBrooksA (2021) Animals and urban gentrification: Displacement and injustice in the trans-species city. Progress in Human Geography (in press).
36.
IgoeJ (2017) The Nature of Spectacle. On Images, Money, and Conserving Capitalism. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
LatourB (1999) Politics of Nature. How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
LorimerJ (2015) Wildlife in the Anthropocene. Conservation After Nature. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
MalmA (2018) The Progress of This Storm: Nature and Society in a Warming World. London: Verso.
41.
MarguliesJKaranthK (2018) The production of human-wildlife conflict: A political animal geography of encounter. Geoforum95: 153–164.
42.
MartineauJ (2016) Time, Capitalism and Alienation. A Socio-Historical Inquiry Into the Making of Modern Time. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.
43.
MarxK (1976) Capital. Volume I. London: Penguin Books.
44.
MarxK (1994) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York: International Publishers.
45.
MarxK (2007) Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. New York: Dover Publications.
46.
MbembeA (2017) Critique of Black Reason. Durham: Duke University Press.
47.
McNeillJEngelkeP (2016) The Great Acceleration: An Environmental History of the Anthropocene Since 1945. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
48.
MerchantC (1983) The Death of Nature. Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. New York: HarperOne.
49.
MurphyMWSchroeringC (2020) Refiguring the plantationocene. Racial capitalism, world-systems analysis, and global socioecological transformation. Journal of World-Systems Research26(2): 400–415.
50.
NealonJT (2008) Foucault Beyond Foucault: Power and Its Intensification Since 1984. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
51.
O’NeilC (2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
52.
PasqualeF (2015) The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms that Control Money and Information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
SadowskiJ (2020) Too Smart: How Digital Capitalism Is Extracting Data, Controlling Our Lives, and Taking Over the World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
54.
SmithDL (2011) Less Than Human: Why We Demean, Enslave, and Exterminate Others. New York: St. Martins.
55.
SoperK (1995) What Is Nature?Oxford: Blackwell.
56.
SrinivasanKKasturiranganR (2016) Political ecology, development and human exceptionalism. Geoforum75: 125–128.
SteeleWWieselIMallerC (2019) More-than-human cities: Where the wild things are. Geoforum106: 411–415.
59.
StolerA (2016) Duress. Imperial Durabilities in Our Times. Durham: Duke University Press.
60.
SullivanS (2010) ‘Ecosystem service commodities’ – a new imperial ecology? Implications for animist immanent ecologies, with Deleuze and Guattari. New Formations69: 111–128.
61.
SwyngedouwEErnstsonH (2018) Interrupting the anthropo-obScene: Immuno-biopolitics and depoliticizing ontologies in the anthropocene. Theory, Culture & Society35(6): 3–30.
62.
TodZ (2016) An indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: ‘Ontology’ is just another word for colonialism. Journal of Historical Sociology29(1): 4–22.
63.
TsingA (2015) The Mushroom at the end of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
64.
TurnerJWelsH (2020) Lion conservation and the lion bone trade in South Africa: On cites, shifting paradigms, “sustainable use” and rehabilitation. The Oriental Anthropologist20(2): 303–314.
65.
Van DoorenTKirkseyEMünsterU (2016) Multispecies studies: Cultivating arts of attentiveness. Environmental Humanities8(1): 1–23.
