Diagrams of COVID-19 inform individuals how to enact specific spatial, mobile, and bodily practices. This commentary employs a non-representational lens to show how certain aesthetics used in diagramming the virus may accentuate existing public feelings of uncertainty, emergency, or threat.
AndersenRSVuoriJAGuillaumeX (2015) Chromatology of security: introducing colours to visual security studies. Security Dialogue46(5): 440–457.
3.
AndersonBHarrisonP (eds) (2010) The promise of non-representational theories. In: Taking-Place: Non-Representational Theories and Geography. Farnham: Ashgate, pp.1–34.
4.
BarryK (2017) The aesthetics of aircraft safety cards: spatial negotiations and affective mobilities in diagrammatic instructions. Mobilities12(3): 365–385.
5.
BarryKAdeyP (in press) Intervention: Displacement Aesthetics. In: AdeyPBowsteadJBrickellKDesaiVDoltonMPinkertonASiddiqiA (eds) The Handbook of Displacement. Singapore: Palgrave.
6.
BissellDFullerG (2017) Material politics of images: visualising future transport infrastructures. Environment and Planning A49(11): 2477–2496.
7.
BoydCEdwardesC (eds) (2019) Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts. Singapore: Palgrave.
DewsburyJD (2010) Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In: DeLyserDHerbertSAitkenSCrangMMcDowellL (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Geography. London: SAGE, pp. 321–334.
12.
EckertAHigginsD (2020) Coronavirus [image]. Public health image library. Centers for disease control and prevention. Available at: https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23311(accessed 1 May 2020).
13.
McCormackD (2012) Geography and abstraction: towards an affirmative critique. Progress in Human Geography36(6): 715–734.
14.
RancièreJ (2009) The Politics of Aesthetics (Rockhill G, Trans.). London: Continuum.