In this commentary, I explore Peters and Steinberg’s use of extension, entanglement and excess as operative terms for their ‘more-than-wet’ ontology. I ask whether the elemental ocean so vividly expressed in their article is commensurable with these terms. In doing so, I suggest that elemental geographies may require further experimentation beyond analytical and grammatical description, and towards poetic, aesthetic and creative gestures that convey the force and complexity of the elements.
BornGBarryA (2010) Art-science: from public understanding to public experiment. Journal of Cultural Economy3(1): 103–119.
4.
CarpenterJR (2018) An Ocean of Static. London: Penned in the Margins.
5.
DeLoughreyD (2019) Allegories of the Anthropocene. Durham: Duke University Press.
6.
EberhardW (2014) Art show. In: SaracenoTPezzatoG (eds) Cosmic Jive: Tomás Saraceno: The Spider Sessions. Genoa: Asinello Press.
7.
McCormackDP (2018) Atmospheric Things: On the Allure of Elemental Envelopment. Durham: Duke University Press.
8.
MagraneEJohnsonM (2017) An art–science approach to bycatch in the Gulf of California shrimp trawling fishery. Cultural Geographies24(3): 487–495.
9.
PetersKSteinbergP (2019) The ocean in excess: towards a more-than-wet ontology. Dialogues in Human Geography9(3): 293–307.
10.
RoseM (2013) Negative governance: vulnerability, biopolitics and the origins of government. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers39: 209–223.
11.
SallisJ (2000) Force of Imagination: The Sense of the Elemental. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
12.
SteinbergPPetersK (2015) Wet ontologies, fluid spaces: giving depth to volume through oceanic thinking. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space33(2): 247–264.
13.
WestJB (2013) Torricelli and the ocean of air: the first measurement of barometric pressure. Physiology28(2): 66–73.
