In this reflection, I take up a variety of open questions and remaining concerns raised by the set of commentaries concerning the implications of the paper for: how we regard climate change as an issue; how knowledge systems might be changed to enable more diverse ways of knowing climate change to take root; and for its politics.
BulkeleyH (2019) Navigating climate’s human geographies: Exploring the whereabouts of climate politics. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 3–17.
2.
CastreeN (2019) Have new map, will travel?Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 22–25.
3.
JonesA (2019) Navigating Bulkeley’s challenge on climate politics and human geography. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 18–21.
4.
LovellH (2019) The absences in climate’s human geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 26–28.
5.
O’BrienKLeichenkoR (2019) Toward an integrative discourse on climate change. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 33–37.
6.
PatersonM (2019) Climate-as-condition, the origins of climate change and the centrality of the social sciences. Dialogues in Human Geography9(1): 29–32.
