Harriet Bulkeley identifies a persistent, and misconceived, framing of climate change as a ‘society–nature problem’ (Bulkeley H (2019). Navigating climate's human geographies: exploring the whereabouts of climate politics. Dialogues in Human Geography 9(1): 3–17). While I concur with her diagnosis, her implied cure begins with geographers volunteering to change their intellectual habits by responding to ‘good arguments’. I challenge this cognitivism and ask what sorts of material frameworks for inquiry will engender an embrace of the idea of ‘climate as condition’.
StirlingA (2008) ‘Opening up’ and ‘closing down’: power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values33(2): 262–294.
14.
VadrotA (2017) Knowledge, IR and the structure-agency debate: towards the concept of ‘epistemic selectivities’. Innovation30(1): 61–72.
15.
VadrotARankovicALapeyreR. (2018) Why are social sciences and humanities needed in the works of the IPBES? A systematic review of the literature. Innovation31(suppl 1): S78–S100.
