In response to the four excellent commentaries on my article, I address several points including the significance of development finance, the problems of development data, and questions about how development goals are created and for whom. I also provide assessment of some more recent literature on the Sustainable Development Goals and consider the rise of neoliberal metrics and the changes in US international policy that affect development.
BergLDHuijbensEHLarsenHG (2016) Producing anxiety in the neoliberal university. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe canadien60(2): 168–180.
3.
BexellMJönssonK (2017) Responsibility and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals. Forum for Development Studies, Taylor & Francis44(1): 13–29.
4.
BrondizioE (2017) Editorial overview: confronting the challenges of implementing global sustainability goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability26–27: v–vii.
D’AlessandroCZuluLC (2017) From the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Africa in the post-2015 development agenda. A geographical perspective. African Geographical Review, 36(1): 1–18.
7.
DowlingR (2008) Geographies of identity: labouring in the ‘neoliberal’ university. Progress in Human Geography32(6): 812–820.
FordJPearceTSmitB. (2007) Reducing vulnerability to climate change in the Arctic: the case of Nunavut, Canada. Arctic60(2): 150–166.
10.
GabayCIlcanS (2017) The affective politics of the Sustainable Development Goals: partnership, capacity-building, and big data. Globalizations, 7731(April): 1–18.
LenschowANewigJChalliesE (2016) Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics25(1): 136–159.
15.
LiuJHullVBatistellaM. (2013) Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecology and Society18(2):26.
16.
LiuJHullVLuoJ. (2015) Multiple telecouplings and their complex interrelationships. Ecology and Society20(3): 44–54.
17.
LivermanD (2015) Reading climate change and climate governance as political ecologies. In: PerraultTBridgeG (eds) The Routledge Handbook of Political Ecology. Taylor and Francis, pp. 303–19.
18.
LivermanDM (2018) Geographic perspectives on development goals: constructive engagements and critical perspectives on the MDGs and the SDGs. Dialogues in Human Geography8(2): 168–185.
19.
MawdsleyE (2015) Development geography 1: cooperation, competition and convergence between ‘North’ and ‘South’. Progress in Human Geography41(1): 108–117.
20.
MawdsleyE (2016) Development geography II: financialization. Progress in Human Geography42(2): 264–274.
21.
MawdsleyE (2018) ‘From billions to trillions’: Financing the SDGs in a world ‘beyond aid’. Dialogues in Human Geography8(2): 191–195.
22.
McEwanCMawdsleyE (2012) Trilateral development cooperation: power and politics in emerging aid relationships. Development and Change43(6): 1185–1209.
23.
MoseleyWG (2018) Geography and engagement with UN development goals: rethinking development or perpetuating the status quo?Dialogues in Human Geography8(2): 201–205.
24.
MountzABondsAMansfieldB. (2015) For slow scholarship: a feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers14(4): 1235–1259.
25.
NightingaleAJ (2016) Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area48(1): 41–47.
26.
NightingaleAJ (2018) Geography’s contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals: ambivalence and performance. Dialogues in Human Geography8(2): 196–200.
27.
RobertsJTWeikmansR (2017) Postface: fragmentation, failing trust and enduring tensions over what counts as climate finance. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics17(1): 129–137.
WeberH (2017) Politics of ‘leaving no one behind’: contesting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals agenda. Globalizations14(3): 399–414.
36.
WinklerITWilliamsC (2017) The Sustainable Development Goals and human rights: a critical early review. The International Journal of Human Rights21(8): 1023–1028.
