In this article, we explore the nature, value, and challenges of dialogue both within and outside the academy. After considering the possibilities and limits to dialogue, we divide our analysis into three sections, first discussing dialogue as a form of embodied action, next examining dialogue as a means of enacting a critically affirmative politics, and finally exploring the challenges of engaging in dialogue as a way of practicing public geographies. In each case, we raise a number of questions concerning the potential of, and limitations to, dialogue in an age of increasing social tensions and political divides. We conclude by suggesting that although there are times when dialogical disengagement is warranted if the conditions of possibility for meaningful dialogue are unfulfilled, scholarly dialogue continues to play an important role in fostering spaces of mutual engagement in a polarized age.
ACME Resistance (2018) Geographers against Trump: reflections on the first annual ACME protest. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies17(1): 1–16.
BrewerJ (2013) Toward a publicly engaged geography: polycentric and iterated research. Southeastern Geographer53(3): 328–347.
14.
BrulleR (2010) From environmental campaigns to advancing the public dialog: environmental communication for civic engagement. Environmental Communication4(1): 82–98.
15.
ButlerJ (1997) Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
16.
CarmodyPCorberaEFletcherR. (2017) What’s left? The role of critical scholarship in a Trumpian age. Geoforum85: 316–317.
DericksonKRoutledgeP (2015) Resourcing scholar-activism: collaboration, transformation, and the production of knowledge. The Professional Geographer67(1): 1–7.
FoucaultM (1984) Polemics, politics, and problematizations: an interview with Michel Foucault. In: RabinowP (ed), The Foucault Reader. New York: Pantheon, pp. 381–390.
33.
FriessDJazeelT (2017) Unlearning ‘landscape’. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(1): 14–21.
34.
FullerDKitchinR (2004) Radical theory/critical praxis. In: FullerDKitchinR (eds), Radical Theory, Critical Praxis: Making a Difference Beyond the Academy? Kelowna: Praxis E-Press, pp. 1–20.
35.
Garcia-RamonMD (2004) The spaces of critical geography: an introduction. Geoforum35(5): 523–524.
36.
GillardR (2016) Unravelling the United Kingdom’s climate policy consensus: the power of ideas, discourse and institutions. Global Environmental Change40(Supplement C): 26–36.
37.
GurevitchZ (2000) Plurality in dialogue: a comment on Bakhtin. Sociology34(2): 243–263.
38.
HarrisonSMasseyDRichardsK. (2004) Thinking across the divide: perspectives on the conversations between physical and human geography. Area36(4): 435–442.
39.
HartPNisbetE (2012) Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research39(6): 701–723.
40.
HarveyD (2017) ‘Listen, anarchist!’ A personal response to Simon Springer’s ‘Why a radical geography must be anarchist’. Dialogues in Human Geography7(3): 233–250.
41.
HowarthCSharmanA (2015) Labeling opinions in the climate debate: a critical review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change6(2): 239–254.
JanzB (2015) Philosophy-in-place and the provenance of dialogue. South African Journal of Philosophy34(4): 480–490.
44.
KhannaR (2008) Communal violence in Gujarat, India: impact of sexual violence and responsibilities of the health care system. Reproductive Health Matters16(31): 142–152.
45.
KindonSPainRKesbyM (eds) (2007) Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place. London: Routledge.
46.
KitchinRLinehanDO’CallaghanC. (2013) Public geographies and social media. Dialogues in Human Geography3(1): 56–72.
47.
KobayashiAPeakeL (1994) Unnatural discourse: ‘race’ and gender in geography. Gender, Place and Culture1(2): 225–243.
48.
KuusM (2014) Geopolitics and Expertise: Knowledge and Authority in European Diplomacy. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.
49.
LaveRWilsonMBarronE. (2014) Intervention: critical physical geography. The Canadian Geographer58(1): 1–10.
50.
LawsonV (2007) Geographies of care and responsibility. Annals of the Association of American Geographers97(1): 1–11.
LiuCSuiD (2017) Exploring the spatiotemporal pattern of cyberbullying with Yik Yak. The Professional Geographer69(3): 412–423.
53.
LonghurstR (2017) Skype: Bodies, Screens, Space. New York: Routledge.
54.
MahtaniM (2014) Toxic geographies: absences in critical race thought and practice in social and cultural geography. Social & Cultural Geography15(4): 359–367.
55.
MansfieldBDoyleM (2017) Nature: a conversation in three parts. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(1): 22–27.
56.
MartinR (2001) Geography and public policy: the case of the missing agenda. Progress in Human Geography25(2): 189–210.
MasseyD (1999) Space-time, ‘science’ and the relationship between physical geography and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers24(3): 261–276.
59.
McKittrickK (2006) Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
60.
McLeanJMaalsenS (2013) Destroying the joint and dying of shame? A geography of revitalised feminism in social media and beyond. Geographical Research51(3): 243–256.
61.
MeldrumHSzymanskiDOchesE. (2017) Speaking out or staying quiet on climate change: broadcast meteorologists influenced by the need to be pithy, popular and politically cautious. In: Leal FilhoWKeenanJ (eds), Climate Change Adaptation in North America: Fostering Resilience and the Regional Capacity to Adapt. Berlin: Springer, pp. 261–277.
MossP (2014) Some rhizomatic recollections of a feminist geographer: working toward an affirmative politics. Gender, Place & Culture21(7): 803–812.
65.
MottCCockayneD (2017) Citation matters: mobilizing the politics of citation toward a practice of ‘conscientious engagement’. Gender, Place & Culture24(7): 954–973.
66.
MouffeC (1993) The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
67.
MouffeC (2013) Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London: Verso.
68.
MountzABondsAMansfieldB. (2015) For slow scholarship: a feminist politics of resistance through collective action in the neoliberal university. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies14(4): 1235–1259.
RickardsL (2015) Critiquing, mining and engaging anthropocene science. Dialogues in Human Geography5(3): 337–342.
76.
RickardsLWisemanJKashimaY (2014) Barriers to effective climate change mitigation: the case of senior government and business decision makers. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change5(6): 753–773.
77.
RobinsonJ (2003) Postcolonising geography: tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography24(3): 273–289.
RoseG (1993) Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
81.
RoseG (2016) Cultural geography going viral. Social & Cultural Geography17(6): 763–767.
82.
Rose-RedwoodRSmithJ (2016) Strange encounters: a dialogue on cultural geography across the political divide. Journal of Cultural Geography33(3): 356–378.
TwamleyKRosenRMayallB (2017) The (im)possibilities of dialogue across feminism and childhood scholarship and activism. Children’s Geographies15(2): 249–255.
96.
Underhill-SemY (2017) Academic work as radical practice: getting in, creating a space, not giving up. Geographical Research55(3): 332–337.
