The broad question around which I frame my dialogue with Briassoulis’s paper is,
why stop at response? I consider this question with three connected
subquestions. Why is it only the response part of the subject matter that needs
assemblage thinking? Can other conceptualizations – environmental degradation,
socioecological systems – remain intact within an assemblage approach? And does
the concept of response itself imply a linear kind of causality arguably
incompatible with assemblages?
AtchisonJ (2015) Experiments in co-existence:
the science and practices of biocontrol in invasive plant
management. Environment and Planning A47. DOI:
10.1177/0308518X15597106.
2.
BriassoulisH (2017) Response assemblages and
their socioecological fit: conceptualizing human responses to environmental
degradation. Dialogues in Human Geography
(this issue).
3.
CountryBWrightSSuchet-PearsonS. (2016) Co-becoming Bawaka: towards
a relational understanding of place/space. Progress
in Human Geography40: 455–475.
4.
ChakrabartyD (2012) Postcolonial studies and the
challenge of climate change. New Literary
History43(1):
1–18.
5.
De LandaM (2006) A New Philosophy of Society:
Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity.
London:
Continuum.
6.
DuitAGalazV (2008) Governance and complexity –
emerging issues for governance theory. Governance:
An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions21(3):
311–335.
7.
EriksenSHNightingaleAJEakinH (2015) Reframing adaptation: the
political nature of climate change adaptation.
Global Environmental Change35: 523–533.
8.
HeadL (2010) Cultural ecology: adaptation
– retrofitting a concept?Progress in Human Geography34(2):234–242
9.
HeadL (2016) Hope and Grief in the Anthropocene:
Rethinking Human-Nature Relations.
London:
Routledge.
10.
HeadLAtchisonJ (2015) Governing invasive plants:
policy and practice in managing the Gamba grass (Andropogon
gayanus) – bushfire nexus in northern
Australia. Land Use Policy47: 225–234.
11.
O’BrienKEriksenSSygnaL. (2006) Questioning complacency:
climate change impacts, vulnerability, and adaptation in
Norway. AMBIO35(2): 50–56
12.
TaylorM (2015) The Political Ecology of Climate
Change Adaptation. London:
Routledge and Earthscan.
13.
TooleSKlockerNHeadL (2016) Re-thinking climate change
adaptation and capacities at the household scale.
Climatic Change135: 203–209.
