By way of rejoinder to commentaries by members of the invisible college of postcolonial urbanism, we further develop issues of praxis regarding engaged pluralism and plead for its usefulness. Engaged pluralism when doing global urban studies depends on a research culture where both deconstructive and reconstructive moments are encouraged. Deconstruction benefits from the provincialization of all knowledge. Reconstruction can occur when we bracket ontological and epistemological incommensurability and focus on the cognitively enriching research praxis of frame switching, where research perspectives constitute nonexclusive, temporary, or alternating entries for research.
AalbersMB (2013) What if we all work in between? Notes on the geography of geographical knowledge production and consumption. Dialogues in Human Geography3: 209–212.
2.
AllenJ (2010) Powerful city networks: more than connections, less than domination and control. Urban Studies47: 2895–2911.
3.
AngermullerJ (2015) Why There is no Poststructuralism in France: The Making of an Intellectual Generation. London: Bloomsbury.
4.
BarnesTJAbrahamssonC (forthcoming) The imprecise wanderings of a precise idea: the travels of spatial analysis. In: MeusburgerPJönsH (eds) The Spatial Mobility of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Springer.
5.
BarnesTJSheppardES (2010) “Nothing includes everything”: towards engaged pluralism in Anglophone economic geography. Progress in Human Geography34: 193–214.
6.
BassensDvan MeeterenM (2015) World cities under conditions of financialized globalization: towards an augmented world city hypothesis. Progress in Human Geography39: 752–775.
7.
BlautJM (1970) Geographic models of imperialism. Antipode2: 65–82.
8.
BlautJM (1979) The dissenting tradition. Annals of the Association of American Geographers69: 157–164.
9.
BrennerNSchmidC (2014) The “urban age” in question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38: 731–755.
10.
BunnellT (2016) Conventionally partial critique. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI: 10.1177/2043820616676563.
11.
CollinsFL (2016) What if the global city was postcolonial. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI: 10.1177/2043820616676566.
12.
CrispRJTurnerRN (2011) Cognitive adaptation to the experience of social and cultural diversity. Psychological Bulletin137: 256–257.
13.
DerudderBTaylorPJ (2016) Change in the world city network, 2000–2012. The Professional Geographer68: 624–637.
14.
El KhouryA (2016) Pluralizing global urbanism: Replacing the God-Trick with Goddess Tactics. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI: 10.1177/2043820616676567.
15.
GierynTF (2002) Three truth-spots. Journal of the History of Behavioral Sciences38: 113–132.
16.
HarveyD (2015) “The most dangerous book I have ever written”: A commentary on seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. Human Geography8: 94–102.
17.
HongYYMorrisMChiuCY. (2000) Multicultural minds: a dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist55: 709–720.
18.
JohnsonL (2016) The subaltern stays silenced: Postcolonial perspectives on global cities. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI: 10.1177/2043820616676559.
19.
KuhnTS (1970 [1962]) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
LeitnerHSheppardES (2016) Provincializing critical urban theory: Extending the ecosystem of possibilities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 228–235.
22.
MasseyD (2007) World City. Cambridge: Polity Press.
23.
ParnellSPieterseE (2016) Translational global praxis: Rethinking methods and modes of African urban research. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 236–246.
RanganH (2016) The Straw man speaks in Dubai. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI: 10.1177/2043820616676561.
26.
RobinsonJ (2015) Comparative urbanism: new geographies and cultures of theorizing the urban. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 187–199.
27.
RobinsonJ (2016) Thinking cities through elsewhere. Progress in Human Geography40(1): 3–29.
28.
RobinsonJRoyA (2016) Global urbanisms and the nature of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 181–186.
29.
RobinsonWIHarrisJ (2000) Towards a global ruling class? Globalization and the transnational capitalist class. Science & Society61(1): 11–54.
30.
RoyA (2016) Who’s afraid of postcolonial theory?International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 200–209.
31.
SassenS (ed) (2002) Global Networks, Linked Cities. New York and London: Routledge.
32.
SassenS (2010) Global inter-city networks and commodity chains: any intersections?Global Networks10: 150–163.
33.
SayerA (2000) Realism and Social Science. London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage.
34.
ScottAJStorperM (2015) The nature of cities: the scope and limits of urban theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research39: 1–15.
35.
SheppardESLeitnerHMaringantiA (2013) Provincializing global urbanism: A manifesto. Urban Geography34: 893–900.
36.
SinhaSVarmaR (2015) Marxism and postcolonial theory: Whats left of the debate?Critical Sociology, DOI: 10.1177/0896920515616263.
37.
TadmoreCTTedlockPE (2006) Biculturalism: a model of the effects of second-culture exposure on acculturation and integrative complexity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology37: 173–190.
38.
TaylorPJDerudderB (2016) World City Network: A Global Urban Analysis. 2nd ed. London and New York: Routledge.
39.
Van MeeterenM (2016) From polycentricity to a renovated urban systems theory: explaining Belgian settlement geographies. PhD Thesis, Ghent University, Belgium.
40.
Van MeeterenMBassensD (2016) World cities and the uneven geographies of financialization: unveiling stratification and hierarchy in the world city archipelago. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 62–81.
41.
WachsmuthDMaddenDJBrennerN (2011) Between abstraction and complexity. City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action15: 740–750.
42.
WalkerRA (2016) Why cities? A response. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research40: 164–180.
