Global cities research is a lively field. It may well benefit from an ‘engaged pluralism’, though such a call still suggests a tolerance of difference by those who remain in positions of power to admit or reject such a challenge and to shape its form as well as to judge its veracity. This response argues further that in this case the ‘straw man’ – or the postcolonial woman – has not been adequately registered, heard or adequately responded to.
BhabhaH (1994) The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.
2.
City of Sydney (2008) Sydney 2030: Green/Global/Connected. Sydney: City of Sydney.
3.
ConnellJ (ed) (2000) Sydney: The Emergence of a World City. London: Oxford University Press.
4.
CrushJ (1994) Post-colonialism, de-colonization and geography. In: GodlewskaASmithN (eds) Geography and Empire. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 333–350.
5.
EdmondsP (2010) Urbanizing Frontiers: Indigenous Peoples and Settlers in 19th-Century Pacific Rim Cities. Vancouver: UBC Press.
6.
FanonF (1966) The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove
7.
HowittR (2001) Frontiers, borders, edges: Liminal challenges to the hegemony of exclusion. Australian Geographical Studies39(2): 233–245.
8.
Industry and Investment NSW (2011) Sydney a Global City for the World of Business. Sydney: Industry and Investment.
9.
JacobsJM (1996) Edge of Empire: Postcolonialism and the city. London: Rutledge.
10.
JacobsJM (1998), Aestheticization and the politics of difference in contemporary cities. In: FincherRJacobsJM (eds) Cities of Difference. New York: The Guildford Press, pp. 252–278.
11.
JacksonS (1997) A disturbing story: the fiction of rationality in land use planning in Aboriginal Australia, Australian Planner34(4): 221–226.
12.
JohnsonLCOakleyS (2013) Place-taking and place-making in waterfront Australia. Urban Studies50(2): 341–355.
13.
KingA (1976) Colonial urban development: culture, social power and environment. London and Boston: Routledge and Paul.
14.
MorrisRC (2010) Can the Subaltern Speak?: Reflection on the History of an Idea. New York: Columbia University Press.
15.
PorterE (2006) Planning in (post) colonial settings: challenges for theory and practice, Planning Theory and Practice7(4): 383–396.
16.
PorterL (2010) Unlearning the Colonial Cultures of Planning. Aldershot: Ashgate.
17.
RobinsonJ (2002) Global and world cities: a view from off the map. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research26(3): 531–554.
18.
SaidE (1993) Culture and Imperialism. London: Chatto.
19.
van MeeterenMDerudderBBassensD (2016) Can the straw man speak? An engagement with postcolonial critiques of ‘global cities research’. Dialogues in Human Geography (this issue). DOI:10.1177/2043820616675984.
20.
Victorian Government (2014) The Vision of Melbourne: Melbourne Will Be a Global City of Opportunity. Melbourne: Department of Transport, Planning and Local Infrastructure.
21.
YeohBSA (2001) Postcolonial cities. Progress in Human Geography25(3): 456–468.
22.
YeohB (1996) Contesting Space: Power Relations in the Urban Built Environment in Colonial Singapore. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.
