FischerCStockmayerGStilesJHoutM (2004). Distinguishing the
geographic levels and social dimensions of U. S. metropolitan
segregation. Demography41: 37–59.
2.
FowlerC (2015) Segregation as a multiscalar
phenomenon and its implications for neighbourhood-scale research: the case
of South Seattle, 1990-2010. Urban
Geography. DOI:
10.1080/02723638.2015.1043775.
3.
GoodmanSWrightM (2015) Does mandatory integration
matter? Effects of civic requirements on immigrant socio-economic and
political outcomes. Journal of Ethnic and Migration
Studies. DOI:
10.1080/1369183X.2015.1042434.
4.
JohnstonRPoulsenMForrestJ (2007) The geography of ethnic
residential segregation: a comparative study of five
countries. Annals of the Association of American
Geographers97: 713–738.
5.
JohnstonRPoulsenMForrestJ (2014) Segregation matters,
measurement matters. In: LloydCShuttleworthIWongD (eds) Social-Spatial Segregation: Concepts, Processes
and Outcomes. Bristol:
Policy Press, pp.
13–44.
6.
JohnstonRVoasDPoulsenM (2003) Measuring spatial
concentration: the use of threshold profiles.
Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design30: 3–14.
7.
JonesKJohnstonRManleyDOwenDCharltonC (2015) Ethnic residential
segregation: a multi-level, multi-group, multi-scale approach – exemplified
by London in 2011, Demography52: 1995–2019.
8.
ManleyDJohnstonRJonesKOwenD (2015) Macro-, meso- and micro-scale
segregation: modelling changing ethnic residential patterns in Auckland, New
Zealand, 2001-2013. Annals of the Association of
American Geographers105: 951–967.
9.
MasseyDDentonN (1988) The dimensions of residential
segregation. Social Forces67: 281–315.
10.
PoulsenMJohnstonRForrestJ (2001) Intraurban ethnic enclaves:
introducing a knowledge-based classification method.
Environment and Planning A33: 2071–2082.
11.
SampsonR (2011) Great American City: Chicago and the
Enduring Neighborhood Effect.
Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
12.
VoasDWilliamsonP (2000) The scale of dissimilarity:
concepts, measurement and an application to socio-economic variation across
England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of
British GeographersNS25: 465–481.