In response to Simon and Randall, article’s focus on the ‘ontological politics of resilience multiple’, we articulate the ethics of care and possibility associated with multiple ‘ontologies of responsibility’. We argue that these inform the practices of resilience and underpin social and environmental justice in a perpetual present.
CookSDNWagenaarH (2012) Navigating the eternally unfolding present: toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration42(1): 3–38.
3.
GroveK (2014) Agency, affect, and the immunological politics of disaster resilience. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space32: 240–256.
4.
HarawayD (2008) When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
HeideggerM (1977) The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (LovittW, Trans.). New York: Garland Publications.
6.
IsraelALSachsC (2013) A climate for feminist intervention: feminist science studies and climate change. In: AlstonMWhittenburyK (eds) Research, Action and Policy: Addressing the Gendered Impacts of Climate Change. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 33–50.
7.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. Durham: Duke University Press.
8.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
9.
NishidaK (1990) An Inquiry into the Good. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1911).
10.
SecombeK (2002) “Beating the odds” versus “changing the odds”: poverty, resilience, and family policy. Journal of Marriage and Family64(2): 384–394.
11.
SimonSRandallS (2016) Geography, ontological politics and the resilient future. Dialogues in Human Geography6(1): 3–18.
12.
YoungIM (2006) Responsibility and global justice: a social connection model. Social Philosophy and Policy23(01): 116.
