Simon and Randalls’ piece does an excellent job of highlighting how resilience is divergently articulated across multiple sites, however the article is characterized by an oscillation between an examination of contrasting discourses of resilience (reflected in the ways it is defined and conceptualized) and an attention to specific empirical incidents of its enactment (offering a basis for ontological politics). I argue this limits the analysis in terms of failures to engage with: (i) the materiality of literary representation; (ii) the specificity of tactics for imagining (as opposed to intervening in) ontological futures; and (iii) the more-than-human contingencies of resilience interventions.
AndersenBAdeyP (2012) Governing events and life: ‘emergency’ in UK Civil Contingencies. Political Geography31: 24–33.
2.
BarryA (2002) The anti-political economy. Economy and Society31(2): 268–284.
3.
BarryA (2010) Materialist politics: metallurgy. In: BraunBWhatmoreSJ (eds) Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy and Public Life. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 89–118.
4.
HarawayDJ (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women. London: Free Association Books.
5.
MolA (1999) Ontological politics. a word and some questions. In: LawJHassardJ (eds) Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 74–89.
6.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.
7.
PhiloC (2000) The birth of the clinic: an unknown work of medical geography. Area32(1): 11–19.
8.
SimonSRandallsS (2016) Geography, Ontological Politics and the Resilient Future. Dialogues in Human Geography6(1): 3–18.
9.
SwyngedouwE (2010) Apocalypse forever?Theory, Culture and Society27(2-3): 213–232.
