This commentary adds to Simon and Randalls’ interrogation of resilience by offering three insights into a more vibrant understanding of multiplicity. First, this article seeks to align the current development of an ever-expanding scientific (and political) project called ‘resilience thinking’, with the ambivalence of resilience politics. Second, it responds to resilience multiple by proposing that resilience is also fluid, a term derived from de Laet and Mol’s fluid technology. Lastly, it extends the implication of fluidity within resilience thinking to the agency of a quasi-actant that shapes and disrupts the current political project of the uncertain future.
AmundsenH (2012) Illusions of resilience? An analysis of community responses to change in Northern Norway. Ecology and Society17(4): 46.
2.
CarpenterSWalkerBAnderiesJM. (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?Ecosystems4(8): 765–781.
3.
De LaetMMolA (2000) The Zimbabwe bush pump: mechanics of a fluid technology. Social Studies of Science30(2): 225–263.
4.
DwiartamaARosinC (2014) Exploring agency beyond humans: the compatibility of Actor-Network Theory (ANT) and resilience thinking. Ecology and Society19(3): 28.
5.
FolkeC (2006) Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social – ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change16: 253–267.
6.
FolkeCCarpenterSElmqvistT. (2002) Resilience and Sustainable Development: Building Adaptive Capacity in a World of Transformations. Scientific Background Paper on Resilience for the process of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Stockholm: Environmental Advisory Council to the Swedish Government.
7.
GundersonLHollingCS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington: Island Press.
8.
HollingCS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics4: 1–23.
9.
JanssenMA (2007) An update on the scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability, and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Ecology and Society12(2): 9.
10.
KrarupTMBlokA (2011) Unfolding the social: quasi-actants, virtual theory, and the new empiricism of Bruno Latour. The Sociological Review59(1): 42–63.
11.
LatourB (2005) Reassembling the Socials: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
Reghezza-ZittMRufatSDjament-TranG. (2012) What resilience is not: uses and abuses. Cybergeo: European Journal of Geography621. Available at: http://cybergeo.revues.org/25554?&em_x=22 (accessed 5 June 2013).
13.
SimonSRandallsS (2016) Geography, Ontological Politics and the Resilient Future. Dialogues in Human Geography6(1): 3–18.
14.
WalshF (1998) Strengthening Family Resilience. New York: Guilford Press.
