In this response to the commentaries, I extend my critique in a new direction, arguing that work on financialization has had the perverse effect of black boxing ‘finance’ and crucial dimensions thereof. In developing this argument, I draw explicitly on, while seeking to generalize from, incisive observations contained in the commentaries. In doing so, I argue that it is important to address limits to financialization—political limits—not identified and addressed in the original article.
AalbersM (2008) The financialization of home and the mortgage market crisis. Competition & Change12: 148–166.
2.
AcharyaVSchnablP,SuarezG (2013) Securitization without risk transfer. Journal of Financial Economics107: 515–536.
3.
ChristophersB (2009) Complexity, finance, and progress in human geography. Progress in Human Geography33: 807–824.
4.
ChristophersB (2015) The limits to financialization. Dialogues in Human Geography5(2): 183–200.
5.
HoK (2009) Liquidated: An Ethnography of Wall Street. Durham: Duke University Press.
6.
HolmesD (2014) Economy of Words: Communicative Imperatives in Central Banks. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
LépinayV (2011) Codes of Finance: Engineering Derivatives in a Global Bank. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8.
MacKenzieD (2005) Opening the black boxes of global finance. Review of International Political Economy12: 555–576.
9.
MacKenzieD (2006) An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge: MIT Press.
10.
MannG (2010) Value after Lehman. Historical Materialism18(4): 172–188.
11.
MianASufiA (2014) House of Debt: How They (and You) Caused the Great Recession, and How We Can Prevent it from Happening Again. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
RajanR (2006) Has finance made the world riskier?European Financial Management12: 499–533.
13.
RilesA (2011) Collateral Knowledge: Legal Reasoning in the Global Financial Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
ZaloomC (2006) Out of the Pits: Traders and Technology from Chicago to London. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.