The proposal for a more quantitative geography curriculum from Johnston et al. (2014) is a welcome contribution to ongoing debates. However, their arguments rely in part on an overly pessimistic assessment of the current status of quantitative methods in the discipline – perhaps reflecting their UK focus. They also underplay the importance of geometry and the models of theoretical geography to any comprehensive treatment of quantitative methods in contemporary geography. These are themes that should be considered in any modern geography curriculum. The future of quantitative methods in geography seems secure and is likely to lead to different curricula in different geographical contexts.
BarnesTJ (2001) Lives lived and lives told: biographies of geography’s quantitative revolution. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space19: 409–429.
2.
BarnesTJ (2003) The place of locational analysis: a selective and interpretive history. Progress in Human Geography27: 69–95.
3.
BarnesTJ (2004) The rise (and decline) of American regional science: lessons for the new economic geography?Journal of Economic Geography4: 107–129.
4.
BarnesTJ (2009) “Not only…but also”: quantitative and critical geography. Professional Geographer61: 292–300.
5.
BattyM (2005) Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models and Fractals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BoxGEP (1979) Some problems of statistics and everyday life. Journal of the American Statistical Association74: 1–4.
7.
CresswellT (2013) Geographic Thought: A Critical Introduction. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.
8.
FotheringhamAS (1997) Trends in quantitative methods I: stressing the local. Progress in Human Geography21: 58–96.
9.
GatrellA (1983) Distance and Space: A Geographical Perspective. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
10.
GouldP (1997) The structure of space(s). Geogafiska Annaler B79: 125–140.
GregoryD (1979) Ideology, Science, and Human Geography. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
13.
HarveyD (1972) Revolutionary and counter revolutionary theory in geography and the problem of ghetto formation. Antipode4: 1–13.
14.
HarveyD (1973) Social Justice and the City. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
15.
JohnstonRJ (1984) A foundling floundering in world three. In: MBillingeDGregoryRMartin (eds) Recollections of a Revolution: Geography as Spatial Science. London, UK: Macmillan, pp. 39–56.
16.
JohnstonRHarrisRJonesJ. (2014) Mutual mis-understanding and avoidance, mis-representations, and disciplinary politics: spatial science and quantitative analysis in (UK) geographical curricula. Dialogues in Human Geography4(1): 3–25.
17.
KwanMPSchwanenT (2009) Quantitative revolution 2: the critical (re)turn. Professional Geographer61: 283–291.
18.
MansonSO’SullivanD (2006) Complexity theory in the study of space and place. Environment and Planning A38: 677–692.
19.
MitchellM (2008) Complexity: A Guided Tour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
20.
O’SullivanD (2004) Complexity science and human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers29: 282–295.
21.
RailsbackSFGrimmV (2012) Agent-Based and Individual-Based Modeling: A Practical Introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22.
SayerA (1984) Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. London, UK: Hutchinson.
23.
SayerA (2009) Who’s afraid of critical social science?Current Sociology57: 767–786.
24.
SmithN (1992) History and philosophy of geography: real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography16: 257–271.
25.
SuiDZ (2004) Tobler’s first law of geography: a big idea for a small world?Annals of the Association of American Geographers94: 269–277.
26.
UnwinDJ (1996) GIS, spatial analysis and spatial statistics. Progress in Human Geography20: 540–551.
27.
WylyE (2009) Strategic positivism. Professional Geographer61: 310–322.
28.
WylyE (2011) Positively radical. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research35: 889–912.
