The commentary addresses three related matters. Since canonicity is a textual matter, we need to pay greater attention to the making and editing of texts. Since canonicity is significant in geography’s pedagogy, we need to be clear as to the purposes of our teaching it. Since canonicity is a reflection both of text and authorship, we need to understand the context to both text and its readership.
FishelovD (2010) Dialogues with/and Great Books: The Dynamics of Canon Formation. Brighton, UK: Sussex Academic Press.
6.
GuilloryJ (1993) Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago, IL and London, UK: University of Chicago Press.
7.
KeighrenIMAbrahamssonCdella DoraV (2012) On canonical geographies. Dialogues in Human Geography2(3). doi: 10.1177/2043820612468534
8.
KermodeF (2004) Pleasure and Change: The Aesthetics of the Canon. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
LenoirT (1998) Inscription practices and materialities of communication. In: LenoirT (ed) Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and the Materiality of Communication. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 1–19.
10.
MayhewR (2010) Printing posterity: Editing Varenius and the construction of geography’s history. In: OgbornMWithersCWJ (eds) Geographies of the Book. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 157–187.
11.
MayhewR (2011) Geography’s genealogies. In: AgnewJALivingstoneDN (eds) The Sage Handbook of Geographical Knowledge. London, UK: SAGE, pp. 21–38.
12.
OgbornMWithersCWJ (2010) Introduction: Book geography, book history. In: OgbornMWithersCWJ (eds) Geographies of the Book. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, pp. 1–25.
13.
WithersCWJKeighrenI (2011) Travels into print: Authoring, editing and narratives of travel and exploration, c.1815–c.1857. Transactions of the Instituteof British Geographers36(4): 560–573.
