Abstract
In this commentary, I respond to Peck’s (2012) call to position markets as central conceptual, methodological and political research objects within economic geography. In particular, I suggest that cultural economy work on market devices and market actors provides two fruitful ways of advancing such a research agenda. Drawing on work on money and finance, I reflect on both the opportunities and challenges of using this approach to foster interdisciplinary heterodox economics understandings of markets.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
