Public discussions of non-normative sexualities are generally ‘tolerated’ in many Thai public spaces; however, being visibly homosexual in Thailand can mean being susceptible to discrimination and stigmatization. In this study, children’s ability to re-narrate their life worlds is articulated and through an a/r/tographic articulation of the assemblages of their onto-epistemic social relations drawn from their everyday encountering of images of gender and sexuality. Their depictions via social media we collected include self-disclosure, desired becoming, intimacy, and the ideal of coupledom and marriage. This study argues that the conspicuous divide between the curated personas of young queers in the digital platform and the nuanced authenticity of their lived experiences may not singularly account for the prejudices they endure within Thai society. The immediacy and alluring nature of these platforms heighten the vulnerability of LGBTQ+ ingénues, whose audacious self-representation serves as both a declaration of identity and a target for inspection.
AhmedS (2006) Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. DOI: 10.1215/9780822388074.
2.
AtayA (2018) Digital life writing: The failure of a diasporic, queer, blue Tinker Bell. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture9(2): 183–193.
3.
AtayA (2020) Intercultural queer slippages and translations. In: EguchiSCalafellBM (eds) Queer Intercultural Communication: The Intersectional Politics of Belonging in and across Differences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, pp.141–156.
4.
AtkinsonCCollLMcBrideRS, et al (2022) Growing sideways: Re-articulating ontologies of childhood within/through relationships and sexuality education (RSE). Children & Society37(6): 2139–2153.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
7.
BaudinetteT (2019) Lovesick, the series: Adapting Japanese ‘Boys Love’ to Thailand and the creation of a new genre of queer media. South East Asia Research27(2): 115–132.
8.
BufordH (2005) The gay market goes mainstream. The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide12(1): 22–25.
9.
ChávezKR (2013) Pushing boundaries: Queer intercultural communication. Journal of International and Intercultural Communication6(2): 83–95.
10.
CorsaroWA (2012) Interpretative reproduction in children’s play. American Journal of Play4(4): 448–504.
11.
De RidderS (2017) Social media and young people’s sexualities: Values, norms, and battlegrounds. Social Media+ Society3(4): 2056305117738992.
12.
DellEBBoyerS (2015) Radical love in a time of heteronormativity: Glee, Gaga and Getting Better. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy5(1): 99-114.
13.
DoungphummesNPhanthaphoommeeNVicarsM (2023) Disrupting the simulacrum of normalcy: Queer online activism and protest in Thailand. In: PainP (ed.) Global LGBTQ Activism: Social Media, Digital Technologies, and Protest Mechanisms. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.215–233.
14.
DoungphummesNSangsingkeoN (2022) Toward the complexity of identity: “Being and not being lesbian” in contemporary Thailand. Journal of Homosexuality69(3): 544–564.
15.
DoungphummesNVicarsMPhanthaphoommeeN (2024) A sense of (dis)connectedness: LGBTQ+ online othering on Thai digital platforms. Sexualities. Epub ahead of print 16 December 2024. DOI: 10.1177/13634607241308634.
16.
EbrahimHB (2010) Situated ethics: Possibilities for young children as research participants in the South African context. Early Child Development and Care180(3): 289–298.
17.
EguchiSCalafellBM (eds) (2019) Queer Intercultural Communication: The Intersectional Politics of Belonging in and across Differences. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
EpsteinDJohnsonR (1999) Schooling Sexualities. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
19.
GeertzC (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
20.
GoorenLJSungkaewTGiltayEJ, et al (2015) Cross-sex hormone use, functional health and mental well-being among transgender men (toms) and transgender women (kathoeys) in Thailand. Culture, Health, and Sexuality17: 92–103.
21.
HaynesFMcKennaT (eds) (2001) Unseen Genders: Beyond the Binaries. Berlin: Peter Lang.
22.
HemmingsA (2009) Ethnographic research with adolescent students: Situated fieldwork ethics and ethical principles governing human research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics4(4): 27–38.
23.
IrwinRL (2004) Introduction: A/r/tography: A metonymic métissage. In: IrwinRLDe CossonA (eds) A/r/tography: Rendering Self through Arts-Based Living Inquiry. Vancouver, BC: Pacific Educational Press, pp.27–41.
24.
IrwinRL (2023) A/r/tography: An invitation to think through art making, researching, teaching and learning. Available at: https://artography.edcp.educ.ubc.ca/ (accessed 27 September 2024).
25.
IrwinRLSpringgayS (2008) A/r/tography as practice-based research. In: SpringgaySIrwinRLLeggoC, et al (eds) Being with A/r/tography. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers, pp.xix–xxxiii.
KängDB (2012) Kathoey “in trend”: Emergent genderscapes, national anxieties, and the re-signification of male-bodied effeminacy in Thailand. Asian Studies Review36: 475–494.
28.
KängDB (2013) Conceptualizing Thai genderscapes: Transformation and continuity in the Thai sex/gender system. In: LiamputtongP (ed.) Contemporary Socio-Cultural and Political Perspectives in Thailand. Berlin: Springer, pp.409–429.
29.
KressGVan LeeuwenT (2001) Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.
30.
LatherP (1992) Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural perspectives. Theory Into Practice31(2): 87–99.
31.
LekklaN (2021) Changes of discourse on gender and sexual diversity in sexuality education textbooks from perversion to acceptance under the concept of multiculturalism that is just a discourse. Journal of Language and Culture40(2): 79-95. Available at: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view/257573 (accessed 4 April 2024).
32.
LugonesM (2007) Heterosexualism and the colonial/modern gender system. Hypatia22(1): 186–219.
33.
LysaghtPBrownLWestbrookR (2009) Integrating image and text: Where one story ends, another begins. Current Narratives1(1): 1–10.
34.
McKennaTVicarsM (2013) Sexualities: Gays and Lesbians as Outsiders. In: McKennaTCacciattoloMVicarsM, (eds) Engaging the Disengaged: Inclusive Approaches to Teaching the Least Advantaged. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 178–194.
35.
McLaughlinM (2004) Critical literacy as comprehension: Expanding reader response. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy48(1): 52–63.
36.
McRobbieA (2009) The Aftermath of feminism: Gender, culture and social change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
MartinF (2016) Queer pop culture in the Sinophone mediasphere. In: IwabuchiKTsaiEBerryC (eds) Routledge Handbook of East Asian Popular Culture. New York, NY: Routledge, pp.205–215.
39.
MuñozJE (1999) Disidentifications: Queers of Color and the Performance of Politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
40.
NeilsenL (2008) Lyrical inquiry. In: KnowlesGColeA (eds) Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples and Issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp.93–101.
41.
NewmanPAReidLTepjanS, et al (2021) LGBT+ inclusion and human rights in Thailand: A scoping review of the literature. BMC Public Health21(1): 1816.
42.
NinA (1961) Seduction of the Minotaur. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.
43.
PinkSLeder MackleyK (2014) Re-enactment methodologies for everyday life research: Art therapy insights for video ethnography. Visual Studies29(2): 146–154.
44.
RitzerGDeanP (2015) Globalization: A Basic Text. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
45.
RobinsonKH (2013) Innocence, Knowledge and the Construction of Childhood: The Contradictory Nature of Sexuality and Censorship in Children’s Contemporary Lives. New York, NY: Routledge.
46.
SadikaBWiebeEMorrisonMA, et al (2020) Intersectional microaggressions and social support for LGBTQ persons of color: A systematic review of the Canadian-based empirical literature. Journal of LGBT Family Studies16(2): 111–147.
47.
SaejangJ (2021) Behind online Y counterculture: The role fansubbing groups and social actors play in driving online Y counterculture. Journal of Language and Culture40(1): 148–166. Available at: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view/254205 Accessed on 14 March 2024.
48.
SikesPPiperH (2010) Ethical research, academic freedom and the role of ethics committees and review procedures in educational research. Method in Education33(3): 205–213.
49.
SinnerALeggoCIrwinRL, et al (2006) Arts-based educational research dissertations: Reviewing the practices of new scholars. Canadian Journal of Education29(4): 223–270.
50.
SiwapathomchaiS (2021) Thai children’s new media use at home: Intra-family communication and reverse socialisation. Journal of Language and Culture40(2): 166–196. Available at: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view/257579 Accessed on 25 May 2024.
51.
Soriano-AyalaEBonillo DíazMCalaVC (2023) TikTok and child hypersexualization: Analysis of videos and narratives of minors. American Journal of Sexuality Education18(2): 210–230.
52.
SpringgaySIrwinRLKindSW (2005) A/r/tography as living inquiry through art and text. Qualitative Inquiry11(6): 897–912.
53.
SpringgaySIrwinRLLeggoC, et al (eds) (2007) Being with A/r/tography. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
54.
SpruceE (2024) Queer encounters: Navigating ‘gay-friendly’ neighbourhoods with (and against) cultural maps of homophobia. Sexualities27(3): 385–403.
55.
StewartK (2007) Ordinary Affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
56.
SzulcL (2020) Digital gender disidentifications: Beyond the subversion versus hegemony dichotomy and toward everyday gender practices. International Journal of Communication14: 5436–5454.
TaylorABlaiseMGiugniM (2013) Haraway’s ‘bag lady story-telling’: Relocating childhood and learning within a ‘post-human landscape’. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education34(1): 48–62.
59.
ThianthaiC (2022) Thai digital natives’ identification and experience of social media cyberhate patterns. Journal of Language and Culture41(1): 76–98. Available at: https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JLC/article/view/262390 Accessed on 28 March 2024.
60.
ThorneBLuriaZ (1986) Sexuality and gender in children’s daily worlds. Social Problems33(3): 176–190.
61.
VuttanontUGreenhalghTGriffinM, et al (2006) “Smart boys” and “sweet girls” - sex education needs in Thai teenagers: A mixed-method study. The Lancet368(9552): 2068–2080.
62.
XieX (2023) The (im)possibilities of queer girlhoods: Chinese girls negotiating queerness and filial piety. Global Studies of Childhood13(2): 116–130.
