Turkish media coverage of children’s relation to the digital world: From “moral panic” to the recognition of opportunities and rights

Abstract

UN General Comment No. 25 (2021) emphasizes the importance of safeguarding children’s rights in the digital sphere. However, in Turkey, media coverage often focuses on the negative aspects of the relationship between digital media and children, overshadowing opportunities, and rights. This study aims to analyze news articles focused on digital media and children to address this issue. Key concepts such as moral panic, framing and discourse are incorporated. Initially assuming a perception of digital media as a threat to social norms and children’s interests, the study utilizes a discourse-historical approach (DHA) to contextualize and explore the discursive strategies employed by national daily newspapers. Conducting a cross-sectional study, textual data from national dailies between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2020, in Turkey are collected, resulting in a corpus of 187 news articles. These articles undergo discourse historical analysis guided by the research question: “How is children’s relationship with the digital world portrayed and discussed in public discourse?” The findings reveal a predominant focus on risks over opportunities and rights, contributing to moral panic and impeding children’s civic participation. In conclusion, this study advocates for the adoption of a child rights perspective in Turkish newspapers to better serve the interests of children.

Keywords

children’s civic participation children’s digital rights discourse analysis moral panic Turkish media coverage

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Austin

Willard

(1998) Generations of Youth Movement. New York: New York University Press.

Bauer

Aarts

(2000) Corpus construction: a principle for qualitative data collection. 2000. In Bauer

Gaskell

(eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage, pp. 19–37

Beck-Gernsheim

(1996) The Normal Chaos of Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Boulianne

(2020) Twenty years of digital media effects on civic and political participation. Communication Research 47(7): 947–966.

Boulianne

Theocharis

(2020) Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review 38(2): 111–127.

Buckingham

(2013) Making Sense of the ‘Digital Generation’: Growing Up with Digital Media. Self & Society 40(3): 7–15.

Clark

(2012) The Parent App: Understanding Families in a Digital Age. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cohen

(2002) Folk Devils and Moral Panics: The Creation of the Mods and Rockers. London: Routledge.

D’Angelo

(2017) Framing: Media frames. In Roessler

Hoffner

van Zoonen

(eds), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. West Sussex: Wiley, pp.1–10.

10.

de Vreese

(2005) News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal + Document Design 13(1): 51–62.

11.

Drotner

(1999) Dangerous media? Panic discourses and dilemmas of modernity. Nordicom Review 35(3): 593–619.

12.

Erdoğan

(2023) The state of well-being of young people in Turkey. Research report 5, Habitat Foundation & Infakto Research. Availablae at: https://habitatdernegi.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Turkiyede-Genclerin-Iyi-Olma-Hali-Raporu-5-Ozet-Rapor.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

13.

Fisk

(2016) Framing Internet Safety: The Governance of Youth Online. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

14.

Fiske

(2004) Culture, ideology and interpellation. In Rivkin

Ryan

(eds) Literary Theory: An Anthology. London: Blackwell, pp.1268–1273.

15.

Furedi

(2008) Paranoid Parenting: Why Ignoring the Experts May Be Best for Your Child. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

16.

Gaskell

(2000) Individual and Group Interviewing. In Bauer

Gaskell

(eds) Qualitative Researching with Text, Image and Sound. London: Sage,pp.39-56.

17.

Goode

Ben-Yehuda

(2009) Moral Panics: The Social Construction of Deviance. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

18.

Hestres

Rochman

Busso

, et al. (2021) How are children’s issues portrayed in the news? A media content analysis. Report, FrameWorks Institute and Leading for Kids. Available at: https://www.frameworksinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/LeadingforKids-MCA.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

19.

Ihlas News Agency (2018) Türkiye’deki çocukların yüzde 59'u akıllı telefon sahibi. Available at: https://www.iha.com.tr/istanbul-haberleri/turkiyedeki-cocuklarin-yuzde-59u-akilli-telefon-sahibi-2092211/ (accessed 5 May 2023).

20.

Jeffery

(2019) Media Technologies of the Family: Parental Anxieties, Practices and Knowledges in the Digital Age. Faculty of Arts and Design, University of Canberra. Available at: https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/34599968/Page_Jeffery_Catherine_RR_copy.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

21.

KONDA (2022) Young people’s perception of human rights: Public opinion survey. Report. Available at: https://www.hakikatadalethafiza.org/sites/default/files/2022-12/konda_hafiza-merkezi_genclerin-insan-haklari-algisi-4.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

22.

Krinsky

(2013) The Ashgate Research Companion to Moral Panics. New York: Routledge.

23.

Lee

Macvarish

Bristow

(2010) Risk, health and parenting culture. Health, Risk & Society 12(4): 293–300.

24.

Livingstone

Blum-Ross

(2020) Parenting for a Digital Future: How Hopes and Fears about Technology Shape Children’s Lives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

25.

Livingstone

Haddon

(2009) Kids Online. Bristol: Policy Press.

26.

Livingstone

Stoilova

(2021) The 4Cs: classifying online risk to children. CO: RE Short Report Series on Key Topics. Leibniz-Institut für Medienforschung, Hans-Bredow-Institut (HBI). Hamburg. Available at: https://doi.org/10.21241/ssoar.71817 (accessed 14 June 2024).

27.

Lupton

(2012) Risk. London: Routledge.

28.

Marsh

Downs

Cranor

(2017) Experts’ Views on Digital Parenting Strategies. Pittsburgh: CyLab Carnegie Mellon University.

29.

McCombs

Shaw

Weaver

. (2014) New directions in agenda-setting theory and research. Mass Communication and Society 17: 781–802.

30.

Mukherjee

Livingstone

(2020) Children and Young People’s Voices. Digital Futures Commission. London: 5Rights Foundation. Available at: https://digitalfuturescommission.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Children-and-Young-Peoples-Voices.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

31.

Osgerby

(2021) Youth Culture and the Media Global Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

32.

Ponte

(2007) Mapping news on children in the mainstream press. European Societies 9(5): 735–754.

33.

Ponte

Bauwens

Mascheroni

(2009) Children and the internet in the news: Agency, voices and agendas. In: Livingstone

Haddon

(eds) Kids Online. Bristol: Policy Press, pp.159–172.

34.

Reisigl

Wodak

(2009) The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In: Wodak

Meyer

(eds) Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage, pp.87–121.

35.

Russell

(2004) The truth about youth: Media portrayals of young people and politics. Journal of Public Affairs 4(4): 347–354.

36.

Scheufele

Tewksbury

(2007) Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57(1): 9–20.

37.

Staksrud

(2013) Children in the online world: Risk, regulation, rights. Nordicom Review 34(Special Issue): 3–12.

38.

Staksrud

(2021a) Key takeaways from the webinar: Understanding online risks for children. Available at: https://core-evidence.eu/posts/online-risks-takeaways (accessed 10 April 2023).

39.

Staksrud

(2021b) Sexual images, risk, and perception among youth: A Nordic example. In: Green

Holloway

Stevenson

, et al. (eds) The Routledge Companion to Digital Media and Children. New York: Routledge, pp.549–561.

40.

Staksrud

Livingstone

(2009) Children and online risk: Powerless victims or resourceful participants? Information, Communication & Society 12(3): 364–387.

41.

Thompson

(1998) Moral Panics. London: Routledge.

42.

Turkish Statistical Institute (2021) Survey on the use of information technologies among children. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Cocuklarda-Bilisim-Teknolojileri-Kullanim-Arastirmasi-2021-41132 (accessed 5 May 2023).

43.

Turkish Statistical Institute and UNICEF (2023) Children with statistics. Available at: https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Turkiye-Cocuk-Arastirmasi-2022-49744 (accessed 5 May 2023).

44.

Turrow

(1999) The Internet and the family: The view from parents, the view from the press. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 566(1): 35–47.

45.

UN (2021) General comment No. 25 on children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. Available at: https://www.ohchr.org/en/documents/general-comments-and-recommendations/general-comment-no-25-2021-childrens-rights-relation (accessed 13 June 2024).

46.

UNICEF East Asia and the Pacific Regional Office (2021) Building Pathways to Empowerment: Recommendations for Promoting Inclusive Youth Civic Engagement. Available at: https://www.unicef.org/eap/media/10051/file/Building%20Pathways%20to%20Empowerment%20report.pdf (accessed 14 June 2024).

47.

Wall

(2022) Being a good digital parent: Representations of parents, youth and the parent-youth relationship in expert advice. Families, Relationships and Societies 11(3): 340–355.

48.

Weiss

(2020) What is youth political participation? Literature review on youth political participation and political attitudes. Frontiers in Political Science 2(1): 1–9.

49.

Zaman

Mascheroni

Holloway

(2020) Opposing narratives about children’s digital media use: A critical discourse analysis of online public advice given to parents in Australia and Belgium. Media International Australia 176(1): 120–137.