The integration of digitization and computer technologies into education has become increasingly relevant, prompting the exploration of their impact on students’ learning effectiveness. The aim of the study was to elucidate the relationship between pedagogical mediation facilitated by information and communication technologies (ICTs) and its effect on pervasive learning. Employing a quantitative research design, the study utilized analysis, interpretation, design, and pedagogical experimentation methods. A correlational study involving a stratified probability sample of 246 students was conducted to examine this relationship. Results revealed a moderate, statistically significant correlation between general pedagogical mediation and pervasive learning. The study identified specific types of mediation – personal, disciplinary, didactic, and instrumental – that are positively correlated with universal learning. These findings highlight the significant association between various forms of pedagogical mediation and pervasive learning. The study underscores the effective role of ICTs in enhancing pedagogical mediation and supports the notion that digital technologies contribute to the advancement of universal learning among students. Theoretical insights were provided by defining pedagogical mediation as the interactive process involving the teacher’s personal, disciplinary, didactic, and instrumental resources. Practical implications suggest that educational strategies should incorporate ICT advantages to optimize pedagogical practices. The results advocate for the development of innovative teaching strategies that integrate digital technologies to improve educational outcomes.
AljawarnehSA (2020) Reviewing and exploring innovative ubiquitous learning tools in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education32: 57–73.
2.
Alzate-OrtizFACastañeda-PatiñoJC (2020) Pedagogical mediation: key to humanizing and transformative education. A look from aesthetics and communication. Educare Electronic Journal24(1): 1–14.
3.
AriasGEVFreireEEEÁvilaGKR (2020) Employment of information and communication technologies as an innovative teaching and learning strategy. University and Society12(5): 136–142.
4.
BaileyLWde PeraltaMSAparicioJM (2021) The role of the teacher in front of the new ways of learning: local, flexible and open. Centers: University Scientific Journal10(1): 82–94.
5.
BarrizonteJLQ (2020) Information and Communications Technologies as a support to international activities and distance learning in universities. University and Society12(1): 366–373.
Berrocal VillegasCRFlores RosasVRMontalvo FritasW, et al. (2021) Distributed environments of ubiquitous learning in times of pandemic: an educational reality in basic education. Contemporary Dilemmas: Education, Politics and Values8(3): 13.
8.
Bravo AlvaradoRN (2021) Effective communication through virtuality in university training. Contemporary Dilemmas: Education, Politics and Values8: 5.
9.
Caballero CifuentesLJRamón CajavilcaPVargasT, et al. (2016) Statistics Applied to Research with SPSS. 1st ed. San Juan de Miraflores: Agosto, 1, 1–256.
10.
CanoNGHernández MonzónHGónzales CanoY (2020) The use of ICT in higher education, a view from educational neuroscience. Scientific Journal Science and Technology20(28): 55–66.
11.
Centeno-CamalR (2021) Technological training and teaching digital competences. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes 2.011(1): 174–182.
12.
Cerdas-MontanoVMora-EspinozaASalas-SotoSE (2020) Remote education in the university context: necessary collaborative work for teaching pedagogical mediation in the time of COVID. Revista Electrónica Educare24: 1–4.
13.
Díaz-VicarioAMercader JuanCGairín SallánJ (2019) Problematic use of ICT in adolescents. Electronic Journal of Educational Research21: e07.
14.
Fernández EspinosaCEVillavicencio AguilarCE (2016) Teacher mediation: a look from paulo freire. Fides et Ratio – Journal of Cultural and Scientific Diffusion of La Salle University in Bolivia12(12): 47–60.
15.
FerreiraMOlcina-SempereGReis-JorgeJ (2019) Teachers as cognitive mediators and promotors of meaningful learning. Revista de Educación43(2): 19.
16.
Flores OrtizAGarcía MartíneziA (2017) Ubiquitous learning system in virtual environments. Revista Cubana de Educación Superior36(2): 27–40.
17.
Fuentes LeivaD (2019) The mediating role of the teacher and the educational intervention. Revista Multi-Ensayos5(9): 6–9.
18.
García-ChitivaM (2021) Collaborative learning in higher education processes mediated by internet. Educare Electronic Journal25(2): 1–19.
19.
González-SanmamedMEstévezISouto-SeijoA, et al. (2020) Digital learning ecologies and professional development of university professors. Communicate: Scientific Journal of Communication and Education28(62): 9–18.
20.
HernándezRMendozaC (2018) Methodology of Research: The Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed Routes. London: McGraw Hill.
21.
HwangGJZouDLinJ (2020) Effects of a multi-level concept mapping-based question-posing approach on students’ ubiquitous learning performance and perceptions. Computers & Education149: 103815.
22.
Lagos ReinosoGGMora BarzolaKMejía CaguanaD, et al. (2018) M-learning, a path to ubiquitous learning in higher education in Ecuador. Iberian Journal of Information Systems and Technologies18(2): 47–59.
23.
León-LeónGZúñiga-MeléndezA (2019) Pedagogical mediation and scientific knowledge using a sample of science teachers in ninth year of two circuits of the Costa Rican educational system, for the development of scientific competences. Educare Electronic Journal23(2): 1–24.
24.
López FlamariqueMEgañaTGarro LarrañagaE (2019) Search, evaluation and selection of digital information in a secondary classroom: tensions between the practice and the discourse of teachers and students. Digital Education Review36: 36–50.
25.
Macazana FernándezDMMendoza HidalgoMLAbarca AriasYM, et al. (2021) A procedure for student research tutoring at the faculty of education of the national university of San Marcos. Revista Universidad y Sociedad13(1): 283–291.
26.
Morales SalasREInfante-MoroJCGallardo-PérezJ (2019) Mediation and interaction in a VPA for effective management in virtual learning. Virtual Campus8(1): 49–61.
27.
Morales TorresMBárzaga QuesadaJMorales TamayoY, et al. (2021a) Virtual environments from the ontology of the new knowledge of higher education in times of pandemic Covid-19. University and Society13(3): 301–307.
28.
Morales TorresMCárdenas ZeaMPMorales TamayoY, et al. (2021b) Information and communication technologies in the management of knowledge. University and Society13(3): 128–134.
29.
Novoa CastilloPFCancino VerdeRFUribe HernándezYC, et al. (2020) Ubiquitous learning in the teaching-learning process. Multi-Essay Magazine1: 2–8.
30.
Obando-AriasM (2021) Pedagogical mediation of learning from the generating question in secondary education: project-based learning. Revista Electrónica Educare25(2): 1–21.
31.
OrozcoAB (2020) Technology and new virtual learning scenarios: is comprehensive communication possible through socio-digital networks?Reason and Word24(108): 1–11.
32.
Padilla VargasMRMullo RomeroE (2020) Information technologies and communication through higher education. Its incorporation in touristic research. University and Society12(2): 281–286.
33.
Peña-AzpiriMAEscudero-NahónA (2020) Approaches to U-learning in formal educational environments. A systematic literature review 2014-2019. Science Technology Society Trilogy12(23): 187–212.
34.
PereiraSFillolJMouraP (2019) Young people learning from digital media outside of school: the informal meets the formal. Comunicar (Huelva)27(58): 41–50.
35.
Pérez-GranadosYH (2012) Evaluation of Teacher Performance and its Influence on Achievement of Learning in the Area of Social Sciences of UGEL 06-2008. Lima: National University of Education Enrique Guzmán y Valle.
36.
PishtariGRodríguez‐TrianaMJSarmiento‐MárquezEM, et al. (2020) Learning design and learning analytics in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology51(4): 1078–1100.
Riofrío-OrozcoOMoscoso-ParraRGarzón-MontealegreJ (2018) Ubiquitous learning in higher education: the where and when of learning. Scientific Journal Science and Technology18(18): 1–17. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8591656.
39.
SandovalCH (2020) Covid-19 education in time ICT tools: the new teaching role in strengthening the teaching process of innovative educational practices. Revista Tecnológica-Educativa Docentes9(2): 24–31.
40.
SuartamaISetyosariPSulthoni, et al. (2020) Development of ubiquitous learning environment based on moodle learning management system. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM)1: 182–187.
41.
Urquidí MartinACCalabor PrietoMSTamarit AznarCT (2019) Virtual learning environments: extending the technology acceptance model. Electronic Journal of Educational Research21: 1–12.
42.
Valderrama-MendozaS (2013) Steps to Develop Scientific Research Projects. Quantitative, Qualitative and Mixed. Lima: San Marcos.
43.
Velázquez GaticaBLópez MartínezRE (2021) Critical analysis of the concept “ubiquitous learning” through conceptual cartography. The Journal of Distance Education21(66): 6.
