You are on the new improved site. You can view the old site in view-only mode here until June 27, 2026

Filter Results

Select search scope: search across all journals or within the current journal

Search this journal

Enter search terms…

Advanced search

/

About

About Sage
About Sage Journals
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use
Contact Us
Help

Information for

Authors
Editors
Librarians
Researchers
Reviewers
Frequently asked questions

All content on this site: Copyright © 2026 Sage Publications. All rights reserved. This website is technically supported and operated by China National Publications Import and Export (Group) Co., Ltd. 京ICP备09090397号-11

Responding to Online Threats Against MPs: Freedom of Speech or Regulation?

Political Insight

Journal indexing and metrics

Journal Homepage Submission guidelines

Restricted access

Research article

First published online September, 2025

Responding to Online Threats Against MPs: Freedom of Speech or Regulation?

, , [...], and

Volume 16, Issue 3

https://doi.org/10.1177/20419058251376832a

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

1.

Jhaver

Shagun

Zhang

Amy X.

2025. ‘Do users want platform moderation or individual control? Examining the role of third-person effects and free speech support in shaping moderation preferences.’ New Media and Society 27(5): 2930–2950.

2.

Shair-Rosenfield

Sarah

Johns

Roberts

Wood

Reed M.

Davies

Graeme A.M.

2024. ‘Who tolerates abuse of MPs?’ Political Insight 15(3): 34–38.

Browse journal

Current issue OnlineFirst All issues

Similar articles

Retricted access

The Importance of Commando Operations in Modern Warfare 1939-82

Retricted access

Nonprofits into the core? An early assessment of potential curricular changes after the 2019 NASPAA standards amendments

Retricted access

Teaching Techniques of Analysis in the MPA Curriculum: Research Methods,Management Science,and “The Third Path”

Retricted access

A review of Title IX and the impact of the ‘Dear Colleague’ Letter on sexual assault reporting policies: Evidence from Massachusetts