Abstract
The development of advanced in vitro models for assessing liver toxicity and drug responses is crucial for personalized medicine and preclinical drug development. 3D bioprinting technology provides opportunities to create human liver models that are suitable for conducting high-throughput screening for liver toxicity. In this study, we fabricated a humanized liver model using human-induced hepatocytes (hiHeps) derived from human fibroblasts via a rapid and efficient reprogramming process. These hiHeps were then employed in 3D bioprinted liver models with bioink materials that closely mimic the natural extracellular matrix. The constructed humanized 3D bioprinted livers (h3DPLs) exhibited mature hepatocyte functions, including albumin expression, glycogen storage, and uptake/release of indocyanine green and acetylated low-density lipoprotein. Notably, h3DPLs demonstrated increased sensitivity to hepatotoxic agents such as acetaminophen (APAP), making them a promising platform for studying drug-induced liver injury. Furthermore, our model accurately reflected the impact of rifampin, a cytochrome P450 inducer, on CYP2E1 levels and APAP hepatotoxicity. These results highlight the potential of hiHep-based h3DPLs as a cost-effective and high-performance alternative for personalized liver toxicity screening and preclinical drug testing, paving the way for improved drug development strategies and personalized therapeutic interventions.
Keywords
Introduction
Advancements in pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics, elucidating the genetic determinants influencing inter-individual variability in drug response and treatment outcomes, have significantly propelled our comprehension of the molecular underpinnings governing disease and therapeutic interventions.1–5 The pharmacokinetic journey of most drugs involves their transit through the liver.6–8 As the primary site for these crucial transformations, the liver plays a pivotal role in modulating the bioavailability and therapeutic effectiveness of various pharmaceutical agents. 9 The development of in vitro liver models using human cells would be supportive to assess the liver toxicity of personalized medicine.
Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting with cell-laden constructs, offers cells an environment emulating the extracellular matrix (ECM) and facilitating cell-cell and cell-ECM interactions, which provides a growth milieu that closely resembles that within the human body.9–11 Compared to emerging technologies such as organoids and organ-on-a-chip systems, 3D bioprinting enables the rapid fabrication of numerous highly consistent and complex artificial tissue or organ structures, making it a promising approach for constructing artificial liver tissues or organs in vitro.12–15 The scaffolds created by 3D bioprinting provide a cell-friendly environment, allowing for the long-term culture of bioprinted tissues.16,17 Moreover, the 3D environment engineered through bioprinting has the potential to enhance the specific functions of mature hepatocytes.18,19 This opens avenues for the creation of in vitro human liver models conducive to high-throughput screening for liver toxicity.20,21
The quality of cell sources is paramount for creating functional 3D bioprinted tissues and organs. 22 The isolation and culture of primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) have been hailed as the benchmark for constructing in vitro human liver models. The current culture methods for primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) face challenges in expansion. Although it is possible to isolated plenty of hepatocytes from human-derived liver tissues, maintaining liver-specific functions of PHHs through the culture process remains limited and it is difficult to harvest PHHs from patients.23,24 This makes it difficult to utilize as a cell source for 3D bioprinting. 25 Hepatocarcinoma cell lines have been applied in various studies. However, hepatocarcinoma cell lines manifest shortcomings in liver-specific functions, particularly metabolic functions.26–29
Human-induced hepatocytes (hiHeps) can be generated from fibroblasts through lentiviral expression of liver-specific transcription factors,30,31 which exhibit functional characteristics similar to mature hepatocytes and demonstrate the ability to expand in vitro. 30 They have been utilized in genetic toxicity testing and regenerative medicine applications for a long time.32,33 Although the recent advancements of stem-cell derived hepatocytes make it possible employed in 3D bioprinting,34–36 hiHeps offer a more cost-effective alternative. 37 The safety concerns of in vivo transplantation of hiHeps remain to be addressed and using in 3D bioprinting for drug testing would be a preliminary step. In the context of personalized medicine, the similarity ensures that the toxic reactions observed in hiHeps closely mimic those in the patient’s liver, aiding in more accurate predictions and personalized treatment plans.
In this study, we employed hiHeps, derived from human fibroblasts, as the cell source to fabricate a humanized 3D bioprinted livers (h3DPLs). This method significantly improved cell viability and liver-specific functions in comparison to other existing liver models. We accomplished the development of a model to simulate drug-induced acute liver injury and conducted assessments for liver injury prevention and drug interactions using the h3DPLs. The results demonstrate that the 3D bioprinted liver models are effective and could serve as personalized platforms for thorough toxicity testing. Figure 1 illustrates the comprehensive schematic design of our proposed approach.

Schematic figure of experimental procedure and generation of hiHeps: (a) experimental procedure: the skin tissue from patients were digested fibroblasts. Fibroblasts were infected with lentivirus and transferred to related genes, leading to induction of hiHeps. hiHeps were bioprinted to fibracate h3DPLs with liver specific functions similar to human liver tissue. H3DPLs were subsequently transferred to well plates for drug hepatotoxicity testing, (b) generation of hiHeps: Human fibroblasts (HFs) are first infected with lentivirus carrying SV40 Large T antigen gene. Then HFsLT were infected with lentivirus carrying the three transcription factors (FOXA3, HNF1A, HNF4A). After induction, HFsLT+3F were treated with collagenase I to enrich hiHeps.
Materials and methods
Materials
Plasmids for molecular cloning and lentivirus production: Addgene, USA. Trizol reagent: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA. Polybrene, DMEM basic medium, PBS, sodium alginate, bovine serum albumin (BSA), and the PAS stain kit: Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., China. Human fibroblast culture medium (HFM) and hepatocyte expansion culture medium (HEM): Shanghai Weien Biotechnology Co., Ltd, China. Human fibroblasts: Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Primary human hepatocytes (PHH): LV Biotech. Collagen-I and gelatin from porcine skin: Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Matrigel: Corning Inc., USA. Rabbit anti-human albumin (Genetex), ASGPR1 (Invitrogen), and CYP2E1 (Proteintech). Goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor® 488/568 conjugates: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA. Triton X-100 and DAPI: Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Calcein/PI cell activity and cytotoxicity detection kit, and enhanced cell count kit (eCCK-8): Beyotime Biotechnology, China. Indocyanine green and acetaminophen: Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Rifampicin: Aladdin Reagent (Shanghai) Co., Ltd, China. N-acetyl-L-cysteine and Dil-ac-LDL: Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA. HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR, 2×Taq Master Mix (Dye Plus), and Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix: Nanjing Vazyme Biotech Co., Ltd, China. Human albumin ELISA kit and human P4502E1 ELISA kit: Shanghai Fusheng Industrial Co., Ltd., China. Vitamin C, vitamin E: MedChemexpress LLC, USA.
Molecular cloning and lentivirus production
Those cDNAs of candidate genes and SV40 large T-antigen were cloned into a modified pWPI plasmid. Constructed plasmids were then introduced into 293FT cells together with packaging plasmid psPAX2 and envelop plasmid pMD2.G, in DMEM basic medium supplemented with 4 μg/mL Polybrene for 24 h, and then changed fresh DMEM basic medium for another 24 h. Then the medium containing lentiviruses was collected and passed through a 0.45 μm filter.
Cell culture
HFs were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 in HFM. Human-induced hepatocytes (hiHeps) were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 in HEM.
HiHep induction and enrichment
HF between passages 5 and 9 were used for hiHep production. 1.75–2 × 105 HFs were seeded on a 6 cm dish. One day later, cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying SV40 Large T-antigen (each MOI = 1) supplemented with 4 µg/mL polybrene for 24 h and then changed to fresh HFM. To generate hiHep cells, 1.0–1.5 × 105 HFLT cells were seeded on a collagen I-coated 6 cm dish. One day later, cells were infected with lentiviruses carrying the three transcription factors (each MOI = 1.5) supplemented with 8 µg/mL polybrene for 24 h and then changed to fresh HFM for another 24 h. The media were then changed to HEM. After the induction process was completed, cells were treated with 50 µg/mL collagenase I until fibroblasts were eliminated.
Organoids culture
Organoids were cultured in a Matrigel-based 3D system. The hiHeps cultured in collagen I-coated dishes were digested to single cells, then resuspended in ice-cold Matrigel at a density of 5 × 105 cells/mL. The mixture was plated into pre-chilled 48-well cell culture plates, polymerized at 37°C, and supplemented with HEM medium. Organoids were cultured in a humidified CO₂ incubator with medium changes every 2 days.
PCR
Total RNA was isolated by Trizol from cells, h3DPLs, and organoids. 1 µg RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with HiScript III RT SuperMix for qPCR (+gDNA wiper) according to manufacturer’s instructions. PCR was performed with 2×Taq Master Mix (Dye Plus). Quantitative real-time PCR was performed with Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix on a 7500 Fast Quantitative real-time PCR system. All q-PCR data were performed with at least two repeats. The PCR products were confirmed by proper melting curves and agarose gel electrophoresis. Primer sequences are provided in Table 1.
List of primer sequences used in amplification.
3D bioprinting and culture of h3DPLs
Gelatin powder was dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 12% at 70°C. Sodium alginate powder was irradiated with ultraviolet light for 40 min and then dissolved in PBS at a concentration of 4% at 70°C. To fabricate h3DPLs, hiHeps were harvested and prepared as a suspension in HEM, then mixed with 12% gelatin solution and 4% sodium alginate solution at a ratio of 2:2:1 (v/v) at 37°C, resulting in a final cell density of 1 × 106/mL, as the bioink. The bioink was drawn into a 5 mL sterilized syringe with a 23 G needle and loaded into the 3D printer after a 15 min pre-cooling process at 4°C. Adjusting the temperatures of both the nozzle and forming chamber, then the presented model and parameters were used for bioprinting. After printing, h3DPLs were ionically crosslinked for 3 min using a 3% CaCl2 solution.
The h3DPLs were cultured at 37°C, 5% CO2 in HEM and medium were changed every 2 days. Crosslink using 3% CaCl2 solution performed every 3 days.
Staining
Immunofluorescent staining: Cells and h3DPLs were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, and then washed three times with PBS. After being blocked by 3% BSA and 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 60 min at room temperature, cells, and h3DPLs were incubated with primary antibodies at 4°C overnight, washed three times with PBS, and then incubated with appropriate fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature in dark. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Primary and secondary antibodies were diluted in PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.5% Triton X-100.
Indocyanine green (ICG) uptake assay: Cells and h3DPLs were changed medium with 1 mg/mL ICG and incubated at 37°C for 1 h, followed by washing with PBS three times, then changed to fresh medium for another 4 h.
Periodic-Acid-Schiff staining and acetylated low-density lipoprotein assay: Cells and h3DPLs were stained by Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stain kit and Dil-ac-LDL following manufacturer’s instructions.
Measurement of cell viability and proliferation
h3DPLs were treated with sodium alginate dissociation solution containing 55 mM sodium citrate, 20 mM EDTA, and 150 mM NaCl to obtain a single-cell suspension for cell counting.
Calcein/PI cell activity and cytotoxicity detection kit were used following the manufacturer’s instruction for live/dead staining of cells. Quantitative analysis of live/dead staining results using ImageJ2 (Version: 2.14.0).
Cell viability was measured with an enhanced cell count kit (eCCK-8) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Evaluation of drug-induced hepatotoxic response
Acetaminophen (APAP) and N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) powder were dissolved in HEM, and the pH of HEM was adjusted using a saturated NaHCO3 solution. Rifampicin powder was dissolved in DMSO under ultrasound-assisted dissolution conditions, as a storage solution. Add the storage solution of rifampicin to HEM to account for 1% of the volume of HEM. Cells and h3DPLs were subjected to live/dead staining after 24 and 48 h of treatment, and RNA extraction and cell viability measurement were performed after 48 h of treatment. Dose–response curves were obtained using the four-parameter variable slope-fitting method (GraphPad Prism 9). Cells and h3DPLs treated with the same volume of HEM without APAP, NAC, and rifampicin were used as internal controls. Samples of each group were prepared in triplicate.
Measurement of albumin secretion and CYP2E1 activity
Albumin secretion and CYP2E1 activity of fibroblasts, hiHeps, and humanized 3D bioprinted livers were measured using ELISA kits, following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Results
Generation of hiHeps with hepatocytes-specific functions
To fabricate functional humanized 3D bioprinted livers (h3DPLs), a large number of hiHeps with hepatocyte-specific functions were required. A refined method from our previous study was employed to transdifferentiate human fibroblasts (HFs) into hiHeps.30,38 To enhance the proliferation capabilities, SV40 large T-antigen was transferred into HFs (Figure 1(b)). The expression of SV40 large T-antigen promotes the expansion of human fibroblasts and reaches the necessary amount for the reprogramming process. Three human transcription factors, including pioneer factors FOXA3, liver-enriched transcription factors HNF1B and HNF4A were carried by lentiviruses and were introduced into human fibroblasts expression of SV40 large T-antigen (HFsLT). Figure 2(a) showed morphology changes of HFsLT after three transcription factors were transferred. HFsLT began to show epithelial characteristics and maintained proliferation capability. At day 10, most of the cells displayed an epithelial morphology that could be recognized as hiHeps. The expression of genes specific for mature hepatocytes such as ALB, AAT, Transferrin, GJB1, ASGPR1, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19 were measured and analyzed by qPCR. Compared with human fibroblasts, hepatocyte-specific genes expression of hiHeps was close to the level of primary human hepatocytes (Figure 2(b)). To confirm the hepatocyte-specific functions of hiHeps, immunofluorescence staining of hepatocyte-specific proteins was performed in hiHeps. The results demonstrated that ALB and ASGPR1 were expressed in hiHeps (Figure 2(c)), and they were not expressed in HFs (Figure S1). Moreover, key mature hepatocyte functions, including indocyanine green (ICG) uptake and release (Figure 2(d)), acetylated low-density lipoprotein (ac-LDL) uptake (Figure 2(e)), and glycogen storage (Figure 2(f)) were also verified in our hiHeps. The secretion of albumin and CYP2E1 activity of hiHeps were also measured using ELISA kits, and the results confirmed that hiHeps possess liver-specific functions (Figure 2(g and h)). By confirming the hepatocyte-specific functions at multiple levels, we have proved the successful generation of hiHeps. These expandable, functional hiHeps were subsequently used as seed cells for the 3D bioprinting of h3DPLs.

Generation of hiHeps with hepatocytes-specific functions: (a) HFsLT+3F gradually exhibits epithelioid clones during induction process, (b) hepatic gene expression in hiHeps, (c) mature hepatic proteins albumin and ASGPR1 expression in hiHeps was determined by immunofluorescence staining, (albumin: red; ASGPR1: red; DAPI: blue) (d) indocyanine green (ICG) uptake and release in hiHeps, (green) (e) intake of acetylated low density lipoprotein labeled with the fluorescent probe 1,1′-dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine perchlorate (DiI-ac-LDL) in hiHeps, (red) (f) glycogen storage by hiHeps was confirmed by Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) staining. (magenta), (g) albumin secretion, (h) CYP2E1 activity. Scale bars, 100 μm.
Fabrication of humanized 3D bioprinted liver (h3DPL) tissues
A gelatin and alginate-based material, modified from previous research, was used to fabricate humanized liver tissues in vitro. 26 To facilitate placement into a 48-well plate for high-throughput liver toxicity testing, the 3D bioprinted liver (h3DPL) tissues were designed cylindrically with a diameter of 10 mm and a height of 2 mm, and porous structures were fabricated to facilitate the effective exchange of substances between hiHeps and the surrounding environment. As shown in Figure 3(a), the structure of h3DPLs remained stable throughout the subsequent cultivation which confirmed the gelatin and alginate-based material was able to serve as a support system. Live/dead staining of h3DPLs demonstrated that the viability of hiHeps was maintained at a high level (Figure 3(b)). Densities of cells in h3DPLs after cultivation were counted in Figure 3(c). hiHeps continued proliferating in h3DPLs and the cell density had reached a stable number of 1.74 ± 0.06 × 106 cells/mL after 5 days of incubation. Cell viability and density in h3DPLs demonstrated that the gelatin-alginate hydrogel scaffold provided a conducive environment for hiHeps survival and proliferation.

Fabrication of humanized 3D bioprinted liver (h3DPL) tissues: (a) bright field photos during 5 days of culture of h3DPLs, (b) images of live/dead staining during 5 days of culture of h3DPLs, (Live: green; Dead: red) (c) cell proliferation curve of hiHeps in h3DPLs, (d) hepatic gene expression in hiHeps in h3DPLs and organoids. The expression levels of the indicated genes were analyzed by qPCR. Data are normalized to hiHeps in h3DPLs, (e) the albumin positive hiHep rate in organoids and h3DPLs was calculated from the fluorescence intensity of immunofluorescence staining images using ImageJ2 (Version: 2.14.0), (f) albumin expression in hiHeps in 2D and h3DPLs was determined by immunofluorescence staining, (Green) (g) albumin secretion, (h) ICG uptake and release in hiHeps in h3DPLs, (green) (i) intake of DiI-ac-LDL in hiHeps in h3DPLs, (red) Scale bars, 100 μm.
The expression genes of h3DPLs, organoids and 2D cultured hiHeps was measured by real-time qPCR. Compared to the other two groups, the expression of mature hepatocyte-specific genes is much higher in h3DPLs (Figure 3(d)). Additionally, the percentage of cells expressing ALB in h3DPLs is also higher than in organoids (Figure 3(e)), and the cell numbers are of the same order of magnitude. Immunofluorescence staining for albumin showed that there is albumin exited in h3DPLs (Figure 3(f)). The secretion of albumin of h3DPLs and 2D-cultured hiHeps were measured using ELISA kits (Figure 3(g)). Indocyanine green (ICG) and acetylated low-density lipoprotein (ac-LDL) uptake were also maintained in h3DPLs (Figure 3(h and i)). Based on modified 3D liver bioprinting methods, we have successfully generated humanized liver tissues in vitro with good viability and mature hepatic functions similar to in vivo liver tissues. These h3DPLs will be applied for liver toxicity evaluation in the following experiments.
Acetaminophen (APAP) induced acute and chronic hepatotoxicity in h3DPLs
Acetaminophen (APAP), commonly used to treat pain and reduce fever, became widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, excessive intake often leads to APAP-induced acute liver injury and is frequently employed to study drug-induced liver injury mechanisms.39,40 As shown in Figure 4(a), APAP is converted to the hepatotoxic N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI) by CYP2E1 enzymes in liver parenchymal cells. Glutathione binds to NAPQI, forming a conjugate that produces cysteine and mercapturic acid. However, when glutathione is depleted, NAPQI damages cellular macromolecules, leading to liver cell death. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a well-known antidote for APAP-induced hepatotoxicity. It is metabolized into cysteine, which replenishes glutathione levels, preventing cell death by maintaining adequate glutathione.

hiHeps in h3DPLs respond to acute hepatotoxicity caused by acetaminophen (APAP): (a) the mechanism of acute hepatotoxicity caused by APAP and prevention by N-acetylcysteine (NAC), (b) images of live cell staining of hiHeps in 2D with different APAP treatment durations under the APAP exposure of 4mM, (Green) (c) the cell survival rate of hiHeps in 2D with different APAP treatment durations was calculated from the fluorescence intensity of live cell staining images using ImageJ2 (Version: 2.14.0) (d) CYP2E1 expression in hiHeps in h3DPLs was determined by immunofluorescence staining, (Green) (e) images of live/dead staining of hiHeps in h3DPLs with different APAP treatment durations and NAC treatment under the APAP exposure of 4mM and the NAC exposure of 5mM, (Live: green; Dead: red) (f) dose-response curves of hiHeps in 2D and h3DPLs after 48 h treatment of APAP. Dose–response curves were obtained using the four-parameter variable slope-fitting method by GraphPad Prism 9, (g) CYP2E1 activity. Scale bars, 100 μm.
To investigate the toxicity response of hiHeps, live/dead staining was conducted on 2D cultured hiHeps to measure cell death after APAP treatment. As shown in Figure 4(b), there was a significant decline in viable cells as APAP treatment duration increased, indicating APAP-induced injury to hiHeps. Quantitative analysis (Figure 4(c)) revealed that the surviving cell percentage significantly dropped after 48 h of treatment, from 93.35 ± 5.21% (24 h) to 32.76 ± 4.07% (48 h). This suggests that most APAP-induced cell death occurs after 24 h, and the damage at 48 h was extensive. Therefore, subsequent experiments used a 48-h APAP treatment duration.
Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) plays a critical role in drug-induced liver damage by metabolizing various medications and environmental toxins into reactive metabolites. To confirm the presence of CYP2E1 in h3DPLs, immunofluorescence staining and ELISA experiments were conducted (Figure 4(d and g)). These results demonstrated the presence of CYP2E1 in h3DPLs, suggesting their capability to respond to APAP-induced injury. Live/dead staining of h3DPLs after 5 days of cultivation showed that APAP is toxic to hiHeps within this model, leading to cell death (Figure 4(e)). Dose-response curves indicated increased sensitivity to APAP in h3DPLs, with an IC50 value of 1.864 mM, compared to a higher IC50 of 3.731 mM for hiHeps in traditional 2D culture (Figure 4(f)). Thus, h3DPLs represent a more sensitive model for studying APAP-induced acute liver injury.
We further evaluated the impact of adding N-acetylcysteine (NAC) on APAP-induced injury in our h3DPL model. The results demonstrated that NAC could mitigate the damage caused by APAP on hiHeps within h3DPLs. Cell viability analysis showed that concurrent treatment with NAC provided protective effects against excessive APAP-induced injury (Figure 5(a)). The protective effect was dose-dependent, with higher NAC concentrations offering greater protection, especially as the concentration of APAP increased. This indicates that NAC can effectively reduce APAP-induced toxicity in hiHeps when used in appropriate concentrations.

Prevention and drug interactions in the h3DPL hepatotoxicity model: (a) cell viability of hiHeps in h3DPLs with different NAC treatment durations under the APAP exposure of 4 mM, (b) CYP2E1 expression in hiHeps in h3DPLs with different rifampicin treatment durations. The expression levels of the indicated genes were analyzed by qPCR. Data are normalized to control (no rifampicin treatment) group, (c) cell viability of hiHeps in h3DPLs with different rifampicin treatment durations, (d) cell viability curve of hiHeps in h3DPLs with different rifampicin treatment durations, (e) cell viability of hiHeps in h3DPLs with vitamin C, vitamin E, and ethanol treatment.
The effects of rifampin on APAP-induced acute liver injury in h3DPLs was also been explored. Rifampin, an anti-tuberculosis drug and known cytochrome P450 inducer, can elevate CYP2E1 levels in liver parenchymal cells. 41 To determine whether rifampin influenced hiHeps in h3DPLs, we measured CYP2E1 gene expression using qPCR. As shown in Figure 5(b), relative mRNA levels of CYP2E1 in h3DPLs increased following rifampin treatment, with higher rifampin concentrations promoting greater CYP2E1 gene expression.
Additionally, rifampin increased the sensitivity of h3DPLs to APAP in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 5(c)). The intensification of APAP hepatotoxicity by rifampin became more pronounced with higher APAP concentrations (Figure 5(d)). The effects of ethanol, vitamin C, and vitamin E were also tested in h3DPLs, yielding results consistent with in vivo observations (Figure 5(e)). These findings indicate that hiHeps within h3DPLs can replicate the hepatotoxicity and pathophysiological processes seen in human liver cells, establishing h3DPLs as a promising in vitro model for investigating human liver toxicity.
Discussion
We successfully developed a humanized liver model using hiHeps transdifferentiated from fibroblasts, fabricated into h3DPLs via extrusion-based 3D bioprinting. Our results demonstrate that hiHeps exhibit key hepatocyte-specific functions, including the expression of mature liver markers and functional assays such as indocyanine green uptake, ac-LDL uptake, and glycogen storage, which are consistent with primary human hepatocytes.
The modified bioink of gelatin and sodium alginate ensured cell viability and functionality during 3D bioprinting. Gelatin supported cell growth, while alginate enabled precise deposition and rapid gelation, forming a porous structure for nutrient exchange. This bioink combination provided a stable scaffold, promoting hiHep proliferation and making it ideal for liver tissue bioprinting. Our evaluation of liver-specific functions in h3DPLs further confirmed their capability to replicate mature hepatocyte activity. The expression of key hepatocyte markers in h3DPLs was comparable to or better than that of liver organoids. Functional assays further support the maturation of hiHeps in the 3D-bioprinted model. These results suggest that the h3DPLs exhibit higher functionality and more closely mimic primary human liver cells than 2D cultures or other in vitro liver models.
To assess the potential of h3DPLs as a personalized liver toxicity platform, we employed APAP as a model compound to induce hepatotoxicity. The increased expression of CYP2E1 in hiHeps within the h3DPLs, compared to 2D cultures, underscores the enhanced sensitivity of this 3D model to APAP-induced liver injury. The dose-response curves further confirmed that hiHeps in h3DPLs exhibit a more pronounced sensitivity to APAP treatment, highlighting the model’s potential for detecting drug-induced liver injury. The protective effect of NAC against APAP toxicity demonstrated the model’s responsiveness to therapeutic interventions, further validating its use in drug testing applications.
Additionally, we explored the impact of rifampin, a CYP2E1 inducer, on APAP-induced hepatotoxicity. Rifampin significantly elevated CYP2E1 expression, increasing hiHep sensitivity to APAP in a concentration-dependent manner. Since rifampin also induces other cytochrome P450 enzymes involved in acetaminophen metabolism,42–45 our findings are similar to results of previous studies.46,47 Ethanol, vitamin C, and vitamin E effects in h3DPLs reflected in vivo findings. These results highlight the potential of h3DPLs to model drug-drug interactions and complex liver pathophysiology, establishing their value in liver toxicity studies.
Despite these promising results, several limitations must be addressed in future research. Incorporating non-parenchymal cells, such as stellate cells, Kupffer cells, endothelial cells, and bile duct cells, will be essential for creating a more comprehensive and physiologically relevant liver model. These cell types play critical roles in liver-specific functions and are necessary for accurately replicating the human liver microenvironment. Additionally, the introduction of vascularization, potentially through the incorporation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), would enhance the delivery of nutrients and oxygen, further improving the functionality and longevity of the bioprinted liver tissues.
Conclusion
Our study presents a robust humanized liver model utilizing hiHeps derived from human fibroblasts. h3DPLs fabricated using hiHeps and 3D bioprinting technology represent a promising platform for assessing liver toxicity in personalized medicine. The ability to generate large numbers of hiHeps in a short period, combined with the advanced functionality of the h3DPLs, positions this model as a viable alternative to traditional 2D cultures and animal models for preclinical drug testing. Further research into the incorporation of non-parenchymal cells and vascularization will be necessary to fully realize the potential of this technology for in vitro liver modeling.
Supplemental Material
sj-docx-1-tej-10.1177_20417314241313341 – Supplemental material for Advanced 3D bioprinted liver models with human-induced hepatocytes for personalized toxicity screening
Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tej-10.1177_20417314241313341 for Advanced 3D bioprinted liver models with human-induced hepatocytes for personalized toxicity screening by Yue Ma, Runbang He, Bo Deng, Miaomiao Luo, Wenjie Zhang, Lina Mao, Wenxiang Hu, Yilei Mao, Huayu Yang and Pengyu Huang in Journal of Tissue Engineering
Footnotes
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Data availability statement
All datasets generated or analyzed during the current study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information. Additional experimental details and more detailed data used or analyzed in this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Declaration of conflicting interests
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: P.H. is funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China (MOST: 2024YFA1107700), CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-058, 2022-I2M-2-003, and 2023-I2M-2-008), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (grant numbers 2021-RC310-004 and 2023-PT310-05), Tianjin Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (21JCJQJC00030), Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Basic Research Cooperation Special Project (22JCZXJC00200), and the Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission (grant number 23ZXRKSY00010). H.Y. is funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 32271470), National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding (2022-PUMCH-B-034).
Ethical approval statement
Written informed consent was obtained from all the patients prior to tissue acquisition. The study was conducted in accordance with recognized ethical guidelines and received approval from the Ethics Review Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Approval No. I-23PJ156).
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Supplemental material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
