To enhance the neutralization efficacy of explosive reactive armor (ERA) against shaped charge jets (SCJs), this study integrates experimental and numerical approaches. Modularized armor panels were analyzed to investigate their dynamic fragmentation characteristics, SCJ morphological evolution, detonation dynamics of interlayer explosives, and damage effects on target plates, ultimately deducing the diffraction mechanism within ERA detonation fields. Results demonstrate that detonation waves induce panel tearing, with ejected fragments and detonation products actively intercepting SCJs. Increasing module quantity distributes blast loading, thereby mitigating overall deformation and prolonging jet–tip interaction duration. Peak protective performance is achieved with four modules, reducing SCJ penetration depth by 43 % while increasing eroded hole length by 55.7 %. This research establishes the coupling mechanism between panel configuration and detonation fields on SCJ disruption, providing critical insights for modern ERA design optimization.
BeckerMKlavzarAWolfT, et al. (2022) Data-driven prediction of plate velocities and plate deformation of explosive reactive armor. Defence Technology18(12): 2141–2149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.07.001
2.
BesschaposchnikovYPPaiVVChernukhinVI, et al. (2021) A mathematical model of the layered plate throwing by detonation products. AIP Conference Proceedings2333: 090023. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0041899
3.
DongYLZiFYangLH, et al. (2022) Research on anti-penetration performance of composite armor of steel/composite materials. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures29(28): 7035–7050. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2021.1991061
4.
GuoZTGaoBGuoZ, et al. (2018) Dynamic constitutive relation based on JC model of Q235 steel. Explosion and Impact38(4): 804–810. https://doi.org/10.11883/bzycj-2016-0333
5.
GuoGDAlamSPeelLD (2022) An investigation of deformation and failure mechanisms of fiber-reinforced composites in layered composite armor. Composite Structures281: 115125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115125
6.
GuoCXChenYGaoYH, et al. (2023) Enhancement of the tensile strength of Titanium/Aluminum triple-layer composite panels using steel fiber. The Journal of the Minerals75(8): 2897–2908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-022-05600-w
7.
HafizogluHKonokmanHEKesemenL, et al. (2023) Effect of fragment impact on shaped charge jet formation and penetration into steel target. World Journal of Engineering20(3): 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJE-10-2021-0588
8.
HaoZWWangZJWangYF, et al. (2023) The effect of three-layer liner on the jet formation and penetration capability of shaped charge jet. Scientific Reports13(1): 13851. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-38680-y
9.
HelteALundgrenJCandleJ (2024) The interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single moving plate. Defence Technology31: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2023.07.001
10.
HuQWLiuRZhouQ, et al. (2022) Effects of microstructure on mechanical and energy release properties of Ni–Al energetic structural materials. Materials Science and Engineering: A849: 143332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2022.143332
11.
IsaacOSAlshammariOGPickeringEG, et al. (2023) Blast wave interaction with structures–An overview. International Journal of Protective Structures14(4): 584–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/20414196221118595
12.
KongCYLiYJinYY, et al. (2024) Analysis of the influence of charge liner on the penetration effect of shaped charge jet assisted window sidetracking. Geoenergy Science and Engineering243: 213300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213300
13.
LenihanDRonanWO'DonoghuePE, et al. (2019) A review of the integrity of metallic vehicle armour to projectile attack. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications233: 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464420718759704
14.
LiRJChaiYHanH, et al. (2017) Protective performance of explosive reactive armor with composite rubber armor as front or back plate. Explosion and Shock Waves37(4): 637–642. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11883/1001-1455(2017)04-0637-06
15.
LimSBaldoviPRoodC (2022) Jet grouping of linear-shaped charges and penetration performance. Applied Sciences12(24): 12768. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412768
16.
LiuYKYinJPWangZJ, et al. (2020) The EFP formation and penetration capability of double-layer shaped charge with wave shaper. Materials13(20): 4519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204519
17.
LiuZDWangSHanZQ (2024) Experiments and numerical simulations on ceramic-metal composite targets penetrated by a 7.62 mm armour-piercing projectile. Journal of Physics: Conference Series2: 052020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2891/5/052020
18.
MaGSHeGGLiuYK, et al. (2020) Study of the forming characteristics of small-caliber ammunition with circumferential MEFP. Materials13(4): 891. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13040891
19.
MaMHGaoGFWangXD, et al. (2025) Penetration characteristics of Ceramic/Metal composite armor impacted by different projectiles. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance34(5): 3633–3647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-024-09412-8
20.
NiHXXuSXCaiY, et al. (2024) Study on impact resistance of square fragments penetrating into new sandwich plates for ships: theoretical derivation and experimental verification. Ocean Engineering304: 117621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117621
21.
PengXFXiangHLiangJY, et al. (2024) Simulation and experimental analysis of explosive reactive armor collateral damage. Journal of Physics: Conference Series2891: 042007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2891/4/042007
22.
ReboulNChinnayyaAPaintendreF, et al. (2025) Experimental and numerical study of the interaction between a shaped charge jet and a single ERA moving plate. Defence Technology50: 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2025.04.003
23.
ReboulNChinnayyaAPaintendreF, et al. (2025) Influence of shaped charge jet state on its interaction with ERA flying plate. Defence Technology49: 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2025.03.006
24.
SaxenaADwivediSPSrivastavaAK, et al. (2021) A computational investigation on the influence of the l/d ratio and strain rate on the deformation behavior of rolled and homogeneous armor steel in the split Hopkinson pressure bar test process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering236: 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089211036531
25.
ShanYZMengXLZhangL, et al. (2024) Research on safety technology of intelligent aviation ammunition system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series2891: 112016. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2891/11/112016
26.
SobolevVVSkobenkoOVKononenkoMM, et al. (2023) Profiled detonation waves in the technologies of explosion treatment of metals. Mechanism and Machine Theory45(11): 1349–1384. https://doi.org/10.15407/mfint.45.11.1349
27.
SongJGTaoXGYangZL (2024) Numerical simulation and experimental study on forming of pentaprism directional MEFP. Scientific Reports14(1): 17017. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67943-5
28.
TanYPHuangZXXiaoQQ, et al. (2022) Theoretical study on hole evolution of inclination finite thickness metal plate impacted by shaped charge jet. International Journal of Impact Engineering163: 104177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104177
29.
TanYPHuangZXXiaoQQ, et al. (2022) Crater expansion of jet oblique penetration into the thin metal plate. Thin-Walled Structures172: 108752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.108752
30.
WangKM (2020) Optimization of geometric perturbations on a rod moving through a high explosive target (No. LLNL-TR-811405). Lawrence Livermore National Lab3: 178–181. https://doi.org/10.2172/1633518
31.
WangQRuiGJunD. (2025) Effect of Mg(OH)2 addition on NH4H2PO4 powder in suppressing the explosion of volatile mixtures of methane and coal. Chemical Engineering Journal528: 172157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2025.172157
32.
WangZYYangLHDongYL, et al. (2024) Dynamic response of hybrid corrugated/foam sandwich structure under combined loading of blast and fragments. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures31(29): 11579–11590. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2308059
33.
WangYGZhangXJLiuPL, et al. (2024) Effect of the inlet spatial fluctuation on the gas–solid continuous rotating detonation flow field characteristics. Physics of Fluids36(7): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215308
34.
WangYZYinJPZhangXP, et al. (2024) Study on jet dynamic impact performance under the influence of standoff. Scientific Reports14(1): 31462. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83272-z
35.
WilliamsPT (2020) A simple reactive‐flow model for corner‐turning in insensitive high explosives, including failure and dead zones. I. The model. Wiley45(10): 1506–1522. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/prep.201900383
36.
XuYJWangXDXieWH, et al. (2024) Effect of structural parameters on the jet formation and penetration capability of small caliber shaped charges. Mechanics30(2): 135–143. https://doi.org/10.5755/j02.mech.32649
37.
YangYFChenXG (2017) Investigation on energy absorption efficiency of each layer in ballistic armour panel for applications in hybrid design. Composite Structures164: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.057
YuYLWuYDWangBT, et al. (2025) Review of the penetration resistance performance of lightweight ceramic composite armor under high-speed impact. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures32(9): 2056–2078. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2024.2374442
40.
ZhouPLiRJZhouD, et al. (2024) Design and experimental research of a new shaped charge liner for enhanced armor piercing and lateral damage. Shock and Vibration2024(1): 6666333. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/6666333
41.
ŻochowskiPWarchołR (2023) Experimental and numerical study on the influence of shaped charge liner cavity filing on jet penetration characteristics in steel targets. Defence Technology23: 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.09.007
