Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Compared to alternative blast loading formulations, the Friedlander-type loading function effectively captures the attenuation characteristics inherent in explosive pressure-time histories, making it extensively adopted for validating blast loading effects on structures. This empirical model also demonstrates significant potential for enabling refined blast-resistant design methodologies in structural engineering. Furthermore, beam components have gained widespread application in protective structural systems due to their inherent energy absorption capacity and load redistribution mechanisms under blast-induced dynamic loading conditions. Considering the enhanced plastic resistance characteristics of beam components, this study investigates the variation of the dynamic coefficient of beam components under Friedlander-type blast loading. The motion differential equations for both flexible and rigid beam components at different stages are derived using the equivalent single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) method. The results of dynamic coefficient calculations under 27 typical loading conditions are presented. The displacement response of I-shaped steel beams under Friedlander-type blast loading for different conditions is simulated using the finite element software LS-DYNA. The theoretical results are then compared with finite element and code-based calculations, validating the feasibility of the proposed theory through multiple methods. The research findings indicate that the finite element method results align well with the theoretical results derived from the Friedlander-type loading model. The current blast-resistant design code is more applicable to flexible beam components, while it shows significant discrepancies for rigid beams, which could hinder blast-resistant design. Both the resistance enhancement factor and the Friedlander-type loading shape parameter reduce the dynamic coefficient, with the latter exerting a stronger influence on the dynamic coefficient than the resistance enhancement factor.

Keywords

blast loading dynamic response dynamic coefficient beam component protective structures

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Biggs

(1964) Introduction to Structural Dynamics. McGraw-Hill.

Canada Standards Association (2012) CSA/S 850-12: Design and Assessment of Buildings Subject to Blast Loads. Canadian Standards Association.

Chen

Song

Wang

(2010) Analytical solution of RC beam system under explosion loading. Engineering Mechanics 27(4): 73–78.

Chen

Luo

Guo

, et al. (2020) Responses of HFR-LWC beams under close-range blast loadings accompanying membrane action. Defence Technology 16(6): 1167–1187.

Chen

Guo

Luo

(2021) Theoretical model for HFR-LWC beam under blast loading accompanying membrane action and its experimental validation. Engineering Mechanics 38(2): 77–91.

Cheng

Yang

Guo

(2009) Analysis on an exponential attenuation factor in the modified friedlander equation by overpressure tests. Journal of Explosion and Shock Waves 29(4): 425–428.

China Architecture & Building Press (2006) GB 50038-2005: Code for Design of Civil Air Defence Basement. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.

China Architecture & Building Press (2012) GB 50009-2012: Load Code for the Design of Building Structures. China Architecture & Building Press.

Cui

Zhang

Hao

(2021) Improved analysis method for structural members subjected to blast loads considering strain hardening and softening effects. Advances in Structural Engineering 24(12): 2622–2636.

10.

Department of the Army (1990) TM5-1300: Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions. Washington: Department of the Army.

11.

Fallah

Louca

(2007) Pressure–impulse diagrams for elastic-plastic-hardening and softening single-degree-of-freedom models subjected to blast loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering 34(4): 823–842. doi: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.01.007, In press.

12.

Fang

Liu

(2010) Underground Protective Structure. China Water & Power Press.

13.

Geng

(2019) Equivalent static load dynamic coefficient for blast load. Acta Armamentarii 40(10): 2088–2095.

14.

Geng

Niu

Wang

(2021) Dynamic increase factor of an equivalent SDOF structural system for beams with different support conditions under conventional blast loading. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 147(4): 06021002.

15.

Geng

Han

Niu

(2023) Study on dynamic coefficient of beam members with linear hardening resistance model under blast load. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics , (Online first)10.7511/jslx20230314002.

16.

Geng

Han

Niu

, et al. (2024) Study on dynamic coefficient of beam members with linear hardening resistance model under blast load. Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics/Jisuan Lixue Xuebao 41(5): 886–893.

17.

Yang

Wang

(2023) Improved single degree of freedom method considering flange deformation of steel beam under blast loading. Journal of Hebei University of Engineering (Natural Science Edition) 40(2): 44–51.

18.

Lan

Feng

Huang

, et al. (2018) Blast response of continuous-density graded cellular material based on the 3D Voronoi model. Defence Technology 14(5): 433–440.

19.

Liao

Tang

, et al. (2019) Study on explosion resistance performance experiment and damage assessment model of high-strength reinforcement concrete beams. International Journal of Impact Engineering 133: 103362.

20.

Lin

Bai

Zhang

(2001) Overpressure functions of blast waves for explosions in air. Explosion and Shock Waves 21(1): 41–46.

21.

Liu

Geng

(2021) Dynamic coefficient of series chemical blast load in building structure. Journal of Vibration and Shock 40(23): 51–57.

22.

Luo

Chen

Guo

(2020) Experimental study on blast-resistances of HFR-LWC beam with membrane effect. Engineering Mechanics 37(5): 237–248.

23.

Fang

(2023) A unified performance-based blast-resistant design approach for RC beams/columns. International Journal of Impact Engineering 173: 104459.

24.

Nagata

Beppu

Ichino

, et al. (2018) Method for evaluating the displacement response of RC beams subjected to close-in explosion using modified SDOF model. Engineering Structures 157: 105–118.

25.

Nassr

Razaqpur

Tait

, et al. (2012a) Experimental performance of steel beams under blast loading. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 26(5): 600–619.

26.

Nassr

Razaqpur

Tait

, et al. (2012b) Single and multi degree of freedom analysis of steel beams under blast loading. Nuclear Engineering and Design 242: 63–77.

27.

Ning

Hong

Geng

, et al. (2024) Dynamic factor of damped beam member under exponential blast load. Journal of Vibration and Shock 43(21): 310–318.

28.

Wei

Zhang

, et al. (2023) Modification of SDOF model for reinforced concrete beams under close-in explosion. Defence Technology 20: 162–186.

29.

Xin

Wang

, et al. (2018) Empirical formula and numerical simulation of TNT explosion shock wave in free air. Missiles and Space Vehicles 3(3): 98–102. doi: 10.7654/j.issn.1004-7182.20180319.

30.

Tang

Wang

(2018) Analysis of dynamic effects on a single-story pre-stressed cable-stayed steel frame caused by sudden cable failure. Steel Construction 33(1): 6–10.

31.

Zhang

Wang

(2019) Quasi-static pressure experiment and numerical simulation of TNT internal explosion. Journal of Ordnance Equipment Engineering 40(5): 195–199.

Dynamic coefficient analysis of enhanced plastic resistance beams under Friedlander-type blast loading

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References