We perform an experimental and numerical study of ballistic impact on the German fired clay brick material VMz28. Parameters for the concrete material model applied in hydrocode simulations stem from material characterization experiments, especially planar plate impact experiments, engineering assumptions, and parameter studies. The performance of the numerical model is illustrated by a comparison of its results to ballistic data on penetration and perforation of spherical steel projectiles. Agreement is found between experiment and simulation for residual velocities and penetration depths. The experimental damage patterns are reproduced in the simulation with sufficient agreement. The application of the model to the impact of another differently shaped generic projectile reveals good predictive capabilities in a part of the impact velocity range. For the deviation found in the other part, limitations of the model concerning the full reproduction of the observed spall failure are discussed as a possible explanation. Overall, with moderate experimental effort, a numerical model with reasonably good predictive capabilities is obtained for engineering purposes.
BarkerLMHollenbachRE (1972) Laser interferometer for measuring high velocities of any reflecting surface. Journal of Applied Physics43: 4669–4675.
2.
BarkerLMSchulerKW (1974) Correction to the velocity-per-fringe relationship for the VISAR interferometer. Journal of Applied Physics45: 3692–3693.
3.
BensonDJ (1992) Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering99: 235–394.
4.
BurnettSGilbertMMolyneauxT, et al. (2007) The performance of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to low-velocity impacts: finite element analysis. International Journal of Impact Engineering34: 1433–1450.
5.
Century Dynamics (2005). AUTODYN Theory Manual, Revision 4.3. Horsham: Century Dynamics.
6.
GilbertMHobbsBMolyneauxTCK (2002) The performance of unreinforced masonry walls subjected to low-velocity impacts: experiments. International Journal of Impact Engineering27: 231–251.
7.
HeineAWickertM (2015) Scale-independent description of the rigid-body penetration of spherical projectiles into semi-infinite adobe targets. International Journal of Impact Engineering75: 27–29.
8.
HeineAWickertM (2016) Ballistic resistance of semi-infinite and finite-thickness adobe targets. In: Proceedings of the 29th international symposium on ballistics, Edinburgh, 9–13 May.
HerrmannW (1969) Constitutive equation for the dynamic compaction of ductile porous materials. Journal of Applied Physics40: 2490–2499.
11.
HoerthTBagusatFHiermaierS (2017) Hugoniot data of Seeberger sandstone up to 7 GPa. International Journal of Impact Engineering90: 122–130.
12.
JohnsonGRCookWH (1983) A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In: Proceedings of the 7th international symposium on ballistics, The Hague, 19–21 April.
13.
LässigTNguyenLMayM, et al. (2015) A non-linear orthotropic hydrocode model for ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene in impact simulations. International Journal of Impact Engineering75: 110–112.
14.
MarshSP (ed.) (1980) LASL Shock Hugoniot Data. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15.
MeyersMA (1994) Dynamic Behavior of Materials. New York: John Wiley.
16.
MilaniGLourençoPBTralliA (2009) Homogenized rigid-plastic model for masonry walls subjected to impact. International Journal of Solids and Structures46: 4133–4149.
17.
ReinhartWD (2012) Dynamic response of masonry materials. In: Proceedings of the 12th hypervelocity impact symposium, Baltimore, MD, 16–20 September.
18.
RiedelW (2009) 10 years RHT: a review of concrete modelling and hydrocode applications. In: HiermaierS (ed.) Predictive Modeling of Dynamic Processes—A Tribute to Professor Klaus Thoma. New York: Springer, pp. 143–165.
19.
RiedelWKawaiNKondoK (2009) Numerical assessment for impact strength measurements in concrete materials. International Journal of Impact Engineering36: 283–293.
20.
RiedelWStolzARollerC, et al. (2011) Impact resistant superstructure for power plants part I: box girders and concrete qualities. In: Transactions SMiRT 21, New Delhi, India, 6–11 November.
21.
RiedelWWickleinMThomaK (2008) Shock properties of conventional and high strength concrete: experimental and mesomechanical analysis. International Journal of Impact Engineering35: 155–171.
22.
RohrINahmeHThomaK (2005) Material characterization and constitutive modelling of ductile high strength steel for a wide range of strain rates. International Journal of Impact Engineering31: 401–433.
23.
SauerCBagusatFHeineA, et al. (2018) Shock response of lightweight adobe masonry. Journal of Dynamic Behavior of Materials4: 231–243.
24.
SauerCHeineARiedelW (2017a) Developing a validated hydrocode model for adobe under impact loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering104: 164–176.
25.
SauerCHeineARiedelW (2019) Comprehensive study of projectile impact on lightweight adobe masonry. International Journal of Impact Engineering125: 56–62.
26.
SauerCHeineAWeberKE, et al. (2017b) Stability of tungsten projectiles penetrating adobe masonry—combined experimental and numerical analysis. International Journal of Impact Engineering109: 67–77.
27.
SchwerLE (2008) Simple input concrete constitutive models: an illustration of brick wall & concrete cylinder perforation. In: 10th LS-DYNA users conference, Dearborn, Michigan, USA, 8–10 June.
28.
WilkinsML (1999) Computer Simulation of Dynamic Phenomena. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
29.
ZakirSMTaoSYulongL, et al. (2018) Numerical studies of penetration in light armor, concrete and brick-wall targets. Revista Matéria23: e12193.
30.
ZukasJA (2004) Introduction to Hydrocodes. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
