Making Evidence-Based Decision Making Ecologically Rational

Abstract

This paper examines Evidence-Based Decision Making (EBDM) within the context of ecological rationality. It contrasts classical rationality, which prioritizes comprehensive and logical evidence utilization, with ecological rationality, which emphasizes practical decision making (DM) under real-world constraints. Our examination underscores the importance of adaptive heuristics, professional judgment, and the integration of experience and expertise in forming intuitive responses. It also examines the limitations of framing intuitive versus analytical thinking as a strict dichotomy and advocates for a balanced approach that considers context and practical constraints. Finally, the paper addresses the potential impacts of motivated reasoning and bias in decision-making. Concluding with practical recommendations, it guides practitioners in applying EBDM in an ecologically rational way, stressing the need to balance an emphasis on classical rationality with professional judgment, expertise, and the specificities of each decision context.