This meta-analysis aims to shed light on the added value of the complex multidimensional view on motivation of Self-determination theory (SDT). We assess the unique and incremental validity of each of SDT’s types of motivation in predicting organizational behavior, and examine SDT’s core proposition that increasing self-determined types of motivation should have increasingly positive outcomes. Meta-analytic findings (124 samples) support SDT, but also adds precision to its predictions: Intrinsic motivation is the most important type of motivation for employee well-being, attitudes and behavior, yet identified regulation is more powerful in predicting performance and organizational citizenship behavior. Furthermore, introjection has both positive and negative consequences, while external regulation has limited associations with employee behavior and has well-being costs. Amotivation only has negative consequences. We address conceptual and methodological implications arising from this research and exemplify how these results may inform and clarify lingering issues in the literature on employee motivation.
AguinisH.SturmanM. C.PierceC. A. (2008). Comparison of three meta-analytic procedures for estimating moderating effects of categorical variables. Organizational Research Methods, 11(1), 9–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106292896
2.
AllanB. A.Batz-BarbarichC.SterlingH. M.TayL. (2019). Outcomes of meaningful work: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 56(3), 500–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12406
3.
AssorA.VansteenkisteM.KaplanA. (2009). Identified versus introjected approach and introjected avoidance motivations in school and in sports: The limited benefits of self-worth strivings. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 482–497.
4.
BaileyC.YeomanR.MaddenA.ThompsonM.KerridgeG. (2019). A review of the empirical literature on meaningful work: Progress and research agenda. Human Resource Development Review, 18(1), 83–113.
5.
BassB. M.AvolioB. J. (1995). Multifactor leadership questionnaire: Leader form, rater form, and scoring key for MLQ (Form 5x-Short). Mind Garden.
6.
BeggC. B.MazumdarM. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 1088–1101.
7.
BlaisM. R.LachanceL.VallerandR. J.BriereN. M.RiddleA. S. (1993). The work motivation inventory. Revue Quebecoise de Psychologie.
8.
BuchtelE. E.NgL. C. Y.NorenzayanA.HeineS. J.BiesanzJ. C.ChenS. X.BondM. H.PengQ.SuY. (2018). A sense of obligation: Cultural differences in the experience of obligation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(11), 1545–1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769610
9.
ByronK.KhazanchiS. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138(4), 809–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027652
10.
CarpiniJ. A.ParkerS. K.GriffinM. A. (2017). A look back and a leap forward: A review and synthesis of the individual work performance literature. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 825–885. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0151
11.
CarverC. S. (2006). Approach, avoidance, and the self-regulation of affect and action. Motivation and Emotion, 30(2), 105–110.
12.
CerasoliC. P.NicklinJ. M.FordM. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
13.
ChemolliE.GagnéM. (2014). Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychological Assessment, 26(2), 575–585. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036212
14.
ChirkovV.RyanR. M.KimY.KaplanU. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 97–110.
15.
CummingG.FinchS. (2005). Inference by eye confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. American Psychologist, 60(2), 170–180.
16.
DanielsM. A.RobinsonS. L. (2019). The shame of it all: A review of shame in organizational life. Journal of Management, 45(6), 2448–2473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318817604
17.
De WitteH.Van den BroeckA. (2011). Arbeid in het nieuwe millenium: Van verplichting tot ontplooiing? In AbtsK.DobbelaereK.VoyéL. (Eds.), Nieuwe tijden, nieuwe mensen. Belgen over arbeid, gezin, ethiek, religie en politiek (pp. 71–104). Lannoo. ISBN: 9789020996739. Open Access.
18.
DeciE. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0030644
19.
DeciE. L.KoestnerR.RyanR. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627
20.
DeciE. L.OlafsenA. H.RyanR. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43.
21.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
22.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
23.
DemeroutiE.BakkerA. B.NachreinerF.SchaufeliW. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
24.
DysvikA.KuvaasB. (2013). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x
25.
EggerM.SmithG.SchneiderM.MinderC. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 315(7109), 629–634.
26.
FernetC. (2011). Development and validation of the work role motivation scale for school principals (WRMS-SP). Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(2), 307–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X10385108
27.
FernetC.SenecalC.GuayF.MarshH.DowsonM. (2008). The work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST). Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 256–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707305764
28.
FerrisD. L.BrownD. J.LianH.KeepingL. M. (2009). When does self-esteem relate to deviant behavior? The role of contingencies of self-worth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1345–1353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016115
29.
FowlerS. (2014). Why motivating people doesn’t work … and what does: the new science of leading, energizing, and engaging (Vol. 36, No. 12). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
30.
GagnéM.DeciE. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.322
31.
GagnéM.ForestJ. (2008). The study of compensation systems through the lens of self-determination theory: Reconciling 35 years of debate. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012757
32.
GagnéM.ForestJ.GilbertM.-H.AubéC.MorinE.MalorniA. (2010). The motivation at work scale: Validation evidence in two languages. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355698
33.
GagnéM.ForestJ.VansteenkisteM.Crevier-BraudL.van den BroeckA.AspeliA. K.BelleroseJ.BenabouC.ChemolliE.GüntertS. T.HalvariH.IndiyastutiD. L.JohnsonP. A.MolstadM. H.NaudinM.NdaoA.OlafsenA. H.RousselP.WangZ.WestbyeC. (2015). The multidimensional work motivation scale: Validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.877892
34.
GerhartB.FangM. (2015). Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: Revisiting long-held beliefs. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 489–521. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111418
35.
GeyskensI.KrishnanR.SteenkampJ.-B. E. M.CunhaP. V. (2009). A review and evaluation of meta-analysis practices in management research. Journal of Management, 35(2), 393–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308328501
36.
GrantA. M. (2012). Leading with meaning: Beneficiary contact, prosocial impact, and the performance effects of transformational leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 458–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0588
37.
GrantA. M.NurmohamedS.AshfordS. J.DekasK. (2011). The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: The interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.03.004
38.
Green-DemersI.LegaultL.PelletierD.PelletierL. G. (2008). Factorial invariance of the Academic Amotivation Inventory (AAI) across gender and grade in a sample of Canadian high school students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68, 862–880.
39.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250–279.
40.
HigginsE. T. (2002). How self-regulation creates distinct values: The case of promotion and prevention decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 12(3), 177–191. https://doi.org/10.1207/153276602760335031
41.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.BureauJ. S. (2017). Testing a continuum structure of self-determined motivation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 143(12), 1346–1377. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000125
42.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.MorinA. J. S. S.ForestJ. (2018). Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. Journal of Management, 44(7), 2638–2664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653
43.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.MorinA. J. S.Van den BroeckA. (2016). Motivation profiles at work: A self-determination theory approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 95–96, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.07.004
44.
HowardJ. L.GagnéM.MorinA. J. S (2020). Putting the pieces together: Reviewing the structural conceptualization of motivation within SDT. Motivation and Emotion, 44, 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-020-09838-2
45.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
46.
IlardiB. C.LeoneD.KasserT.RyanR. M. (1993). Employee and supervisor ratings of motivation: Main effects and discrepancies associated with job satisfaction and adjustment in a factory setting. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23(21), 1789–1805.
47.
IyengarS. S.LepperM. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 349–366.
48.
JiangK.HuJ.LiuS.LepakD. P. (2015). Understanding employees’ perceptions of human resource practices: Effects of demographic dissimilarity to managers and coworkers. Human Resource Management, 56(1), 69–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21771
49.
JohnsonD. A.DickinsonA. M. (2010). Employee-of-the-month programs: Do they really work?Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 30(4), 308–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/01608061.2010.520144
50.
JungertT.Van den BroeckA.SchreursB.OstermanU. (2018). How colleagues can support each other’s needs and motivation: An intervention on employee work motivation. Applied Psychology, 67(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12110
51.
KanferR.ChenG. (2016). Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.002
52.
KanferR.FreseM.JohnsonR. E. (2017). Motivation related to work: A century of progress journal of applied psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000133
53.
KimS.ThibodeauR.JorgensenR. S. (2011). Shame, guilt, and depressive symptoms: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 137(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021466
54.
KoestnerR.LosierG. F. (2002). Distinguishing three ways of being highly motivated: A closer look at introjection, identification, and intrinsic motivation. In DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research. University of Rochester Press, 101–121.
55.
Kristof-BrownA. L.ZimmermanR. D.JohnsonE. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 281–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
56.
KruglanskiA.ShahJ. Y.FishbachA.FriedmanR.ChunW. Y.Sleeth-KepplerD. (2002). A theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092805
57.
KuhlJ. (2000). A functional-design approach to motivation and self-regulation: The dynamics of personality systems interactions. In BoekaertsM.PintrichP. R.ZeidnerM. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 111–169). Academic Press.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (2019). The development of goal setting theory: A half century retrospective. Motivation Science, 5(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/mot0000127
60.
McAuleyL.PhamB.TugwellP.MoherD. (2000). Does the inclusion of grey literature influence estimates of intervention effectiveness reported in meta-analyses?Lancet, 356(9237), 1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02786-0
MeyerJ. P.BeckerT. E.VandenbergheC. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: A conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 991–1007.
63.
NgJ. Y. Y.NtoumanisN.Thogersen-NtoumaniC.DeciE. L.RyanR. M.DudaJ. L.WilliamsG. C. (2012). Self-determination theory applied to health contexts: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(4), 325–340. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612447309
64.
PelletierL. G.TusonK. M.FortierM. S.VallerandR. J.BriéreN. M.BlaisM. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The sport motivation scale (SMS). Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35
65.
PinderC. (2008). Work motivation in organizational behavior (2nd ed.). Psychology press.
66.
PinkD. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. Riverhead Books.
67.
PodsakoffP.MacKenzieS.LeeJ.PodsakoffN. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.
68.
PyszczynskiT.GreenbergJ.SolomonS. (2000). Toward a dialectical analysis of growth and defensive motives. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 301–305.
RossoB. D.DekasK. H.WrzesniewskiA. (2010). On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 91–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001
71.
RubinM. (2017). When does HARKing hurt? Identifying when different types of undisclosed post hoc hypothesizing harm scientific progress. Review of General Psychology, 21(4), 308–320. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000128
72.
RyanR. M.ConnellJ. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749–761. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2810024
73.
RyanR. M.DeciE. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
74.
RyanR. M.HutaV.DeciE. L. (2008). Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 139–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4
75.
SadlerP.WoodyE. (2003). Is who you are who you’re talking to? Interpersonal style and complementarity in mixed-sex interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.1.80
76.
SchmidtF. L.HunterJ. E. (2015). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. SAGE.
77.
ShawJ. D.GuptaN. (2015). Let the evidence speak again! Financial incentives are more effective than we thought. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(3), 281–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12080
78.
SheldonK. M. (2011). Integrating behavioral-motive and experiential-requirement perspectives on psychological needs: A two process model. Psychological Review, 118(4), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024758
79.
SheldonK. M.SchülerJ. (2011). Wanting, having, and needing: Integrating motive disposition theory and self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 1106–1123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024952
80.
SheldonK. M.TurbanD. B.BrownK. G.BarrickM. R.JudgeT. A. (2003). Applying self-determination theory to organizational research. In MartocchioJ. J.FerrisG. R.Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 22, pp. 357–393). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22008-9
81.
SlempG. R.FieldJ. G.ChoA. S. H. (2020). A meta-analysis of autonomous and controlled forms of teacher motivation. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 121(October 2019), 103459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103459
82.
SlempG. R.KernM. L.PatrickK. J.RyanR. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
83.
SmokrovićE.ŽvanutM. F.BajanA.RadićR.ŽvanutB. (2019). The effect of job satisfaction, absenteeism, and personal motivation on job quitting: A survey of Croatian nurses. Journal of East European Management Studies, 24(3), 398–422. https://doi.org/10.5771/0949-6181-2019-3-398
84.
StraussK.ParkerS. K.SheaD. O. (2017). When does proactivity have a cost? Motivation at work moderates the effects of proactive work behavior on employee job strain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.001
85.
TonidandelS.LeBretonJ. M. (2015). RWA web: A free, comprehensive, web-based, and user-friendly tool for relative weight analyses. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-014-9351-z
86.
Tóth-KirályI.MorinA. J. S.BőtheB.RigóA.OroszG. (2020). Toward an improved understanding of work motivation profiles. Applied Psychology, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12256
87.
TracyJ. L.RobinsR. W. (2007). Emerging insights into the nature and function of pride. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00493.x
88.
TremblayM. A.BlanchardC. M.TaylorS.PelletierL. G.VilleneuveM. (2009). Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: Its value for organizational psychology research. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 41(4), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015167
89.
Van AertR.WichertsJ.Van AssenM.MacleodM. (2019). Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis. Plos One, 14(4), 0215052.
90.
van BeekI.HuQ.SchaufeliW. B.TarisT. W.SchreursB. H. J. (2012). For fun, love, or money: What drives workaholic, engaged, and burned-out employees at work?Applied Psychology: An International Review, 61(1), 30–55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00454.x
91.
van BeekI.TarisT. W.SchaufeliW. B. (2011). Workaholic and work engaged employees: Dead ringers or worlds apart?Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 16(4), 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024392
92.
Van De VoordeK.PaauweJ.Van VeldhovenM. (2012). Employee well-being and the HRM-organizational performance relationship: A review of quantitative studies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00322.x
93.
Van den BroeckA.CarpiniJ.DiefendorffJ. (2019). Work motivation: Where do the different perspectives lead us. In RyanR. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation. John Wiley & Sons.
94.
Van den BroeckA.FerrisD. L.ChangC.-H.RosenC. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1195–1229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316632058
95.
Van den BroeckA.LensW.De WitteH.Van CoillieH. (2013). Unraveling the importance of the quantity and the quality of workers’ motivation for well-being: A person-centered perspective. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 82(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2012.11.005
96.
Van den BroeckA.SchreursB.De WitteH.VansteenkisteM.GermeysF.SchaufeliW. (2011). Understanding workaholics’ motivations: A self-determination perspective. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 60(4), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2011.00449.x
VanthournoutG.KyndtE.GijbelsD.Van den BosscheP. (2015). Understanding the direct and indirect relations between motivation to participate, goal orientation and the use of self-regulation strategies during a formal training. Zeitschrift Für Erziehungswissenschaft, 18(S1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0601-7
99.
YuS.Levesque-BristolC., & MaedaY. (2018). General need for autonomy and subjective well-being: A meta-analysis of studies in the US and East Asia. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(6), 1863–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9898-2
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
