Effects of relative team size on teams with innovative tasks

Abstract

A large body of research accumulated on the consequences that absolute team size (i.e., team headcount) entails for the performance of teams working on innovative tasks. However, there is a dearth of research on team size in relation to a team’s assignments and objectives (i.e., relative team size). How this relative team size might influence innovation teams is therefore poorly understood. To stimulate theorizing on relative team size, we derive propositions from understaffing theory on how varying levels of relative team size affect teams with innovative tasks. We provide a more fine-grained analysis by differentiating between different dimensions of these teams’ performance (i.e., team creativity, output quality, and team efficiency) and develop an input-mediator-output model. Implications of our theoretical considerations and avenues for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Creativity innovation teams relative team size understaffing theory

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ancona

Bresman

(2013). X-teams: How to build teams that lead, innovate, and succeed. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.

Arnold

D. W.

Greenberg

C. I.

(1980). Deviate rejection within differentially manned groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43(4), 419–424.

Baer

(2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592–601.

Barker

R. G.

(1960). Ecology and motivation. In Jones

(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 1–49). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Barker

R. G.

(1968). Ecological psychology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Beal

D. J.

Cohen

R. R.

Burke

M. J.

McLendon

C. L.

(2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004.

Bechtel

R. B.

(1974). The undermanned environment: A universal theory. In Carson

D. H.

(Ed.), Man–environment interactions, Part VIII (pp. 227–244). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross.

Bedwell

W. L.

Salas

Funke

G. J.

Knott

B. A.

(2014). Team workload: A multilevel perspective. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(2), 99–123.

Biemann

Cole

M. S.

Voelpel

(2012). Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of r_wg and r_wg(j) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(1), 66–80.

10.

Blank

T. H.

Naveh

(2014). Do quality and innovation compete against or complement each other? The moderating role of an information exchange climate. Quality Management Journal, 21(2), 6–16.

11.

Blau

P. M.

(1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.

12.

Browning

T. R.

Sanders

N. R.

(2012). Can innovation be lean? California Management Review, 54(4), 5–19.

13.

Bruns

H. C.

(2013). Working alone together: Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 62–83.

14.

Bstieler

(2005). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 267–284.

15.

Campion

M. A.

Medsker

G. J.

Higgs

A. C.

(1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823–850.

16.

Campion

M. A.

Papper

E. M.

Medsker

G. J.

(1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology, 49(2), 429–452.

17.

Carling

Bloomfield

(2010). The effect of an early dismissal on player work-rate in a professional soccer match. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(1), 126–128.

18.

Chiesa

Frattini

Lazzarotti

Manzini

(2009). Performance measurement in R&D: Exploring the interplay between measurement objectives, dimensions of performance and contextual factors. R&D Management, 39(5), 487–519.

19.

Cini

M. A.

Moreland

R. L.

Levine

J. M.

(1993). Group staffing levels and responses to prospective and new group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 723–734.

20.

Clarkson

J. J.

Hirt

E. R.

Jia

Alexander

M. B.

(2010). When perception is more than reality: The effects of perceived versus actual resource depletion on self-regulatory behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(1), 29–46.

21.

Cohen

S. G.

Bailey

D. E.

(1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239–290.

22.

Cooper

R. G.

Kleinschmidt

E. J.

(1986). An investigation into the new product process: Steps, deficiencies, and impact. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(2), 71–85.

23.

Cordery

J. L.

Morrison

Wright

B. M.

Wall

T. D.

(2010). The impact of autonomy and task uncertainty on team performance: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2–3), 240–258.

24.

Cronin

M. A.

Weingart

L. R.

(2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 761–773.

25.

Curral

L. A.

Forrester

R. H.

Dawson

J. F.

West

M. A.

(2001). It’s what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 187–204.

26.

De Dreu

C. K. W.

West

M. A.

(2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.

27.

De Jong

B. A.

Elfring

T. O. M.

(2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549.

28.

Drach-Zahavy

Freund

(2007). Team effectiveness under stress: A structural contingency approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28(4), 423–450.

29.

Edmondson

A. C.

Nembhard

I. M.

(2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 123–138.

30.

Ganster

D. C.

Dwyer

D. J.

(1995). The effects of understaffing on individual and group performance in professional and trade occupations. Journal of Management, 21(2), 175–190.

31.

Ganster

D. C.

Rosen

C. C.

(2013). Work stress and employee health: A multidisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 39(5), 1085–1122.

32.

Gebert

Boerner

Kearney

(2006). Cross-functionality and innovation in new product development teams: A dilemmatic structure and its consequences for the management of diversity. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(4), 431–458.

33.

Gemser

Leenders

M. A. A. M.

(2011). Managing cross-functional cooperation for new product development success. Long Range Planning, 44(1), 26–41.

34.

Gladstein

D. L.

(1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499–517.

35.

Goh

K. T.

Goodman

P. S.

Weingart

L. R.

(2013). Team innovation processes: An examination of activity cycles in creative project teams. Small Group Research, 44(2), 159–194.

36.

Greenberg

C. I.

Wang

Y.-d.

Dossett

D. L.

(1982). Effects of work group size and task size on observers’ job characteristics ratings. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 3(1), 53–66.

37.

Griffin

M. A.

Neal

Parker

S. K.

(2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.

38.

Guimera

Uzzi

Spiro

Amaral

L. A. N.

(2005). Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science, 308(5722), 697–702.

39.

Hackman

J. R.

(1987). The design of work teams. In Lorsch

J. W.

(Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315–342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

40.

Hackman

J. R.

Oldham

G. R.

(1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250–279.

41.

Hawkins

S. A.

Hastie

(1990). Hindsight: Biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin, 107(3), 311–327.

42.

Heft

(2001). James Gibson, Roger Barker, and the legacy of William James’s radical empiricism. New York, NY: Routledge.

43.

Hoegl

(2005). Smaller teams—better teamwork: How to keep project teams small. Business Horizons, 48(3), 209–214.

44.

Hoegl

Gemuenden

H. G.

(2001). Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science, 12(4), 435–449.

45.

Hoever

I. J.

van Knippenberg

van Ginkel

W. P.

Barkema

H. G.

(2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 982–996.

46.

Hudson

C. K.

Shen

(2015). Understaffing: An under-researched phenomenon. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(3), 244–263.

47.

Hülsheger

U. R.

Anderson

Salgado

J. F.

(2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145.

48.

Ilgen

D. R.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

Johnson

Jundt

(2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 517–543.

49.

Jackson

S. E.

Joshi

Erhardt

N. L.

(2003). Recent research on team and organizational diversity: SWOT analysis and implications. Journal of Management, 29(6), 801–830.

50.

James

L. R.

Demaree

R. G.

Wolf

(1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309.

51.

Jehn

K. A.

Bezrukova

(2010). The faultline activation process and the effects of activated faultlines on coalition formation, conflict, and group outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 112(1), 24–42.

52.

Jetten

Hornsey

M. J.

(2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 461–485.

53.

Karau

S. J.

Williams

K. D.

(1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.

54.

Kearney

Gebert

(2009). Managing diversity and enhancing team outcomes: The promise of transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 77–89.

55.

Kearney

Gebert

Voelpel

S. C.

(2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598.

56.

Keller

R. T.

(2006). Transformational leadership, initiating structure, and substitutes for leadership: A longitudinal study of research and development project team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 202–210.

57.

Kessler

E. H.

(2000). Tightening the belt: Methods for reducing development costs associated with new product innovation. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(1), 59–92.

58.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Bell

B. F.

(2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In Borman

W. C.

Ilgen

D. R.

Klimoski

R. J.

(Eds.), Handbook of psychology. Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 333–375). New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.

59.

Lau

D. C.

Murnighan

J. K.

(1998). Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 325–340.

60.

Lau

D. C.

Murnighan

J. K.

(2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645–659.

61.

LePine

J. A.

Piccolo

R. F.

Jackson

C. L.

Mathieu

J. E.

Saul

J. R.

(2008). A meta-analysis of teamwork processes: Tests of a multidimensional model and relationships with team effectiveness criteria. Personnel Psychology, 61(2), 273–307.

62.

Lester

S. W.

Meglino

B. M.

Korsgaard

M. A.

(2002). The antecedents and consequences of group potency: A longitudinal investigation of newly formed work groups. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 352–368.

63.

Lewis

Belliveau

Herndon

Keller

(2007). Group cognition, membership change, and performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159–178.

64.

Xin

Pillutla

(2002). Multi-cultural leadership teams and organizational identification in international joint ventures. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(2), 320–337.

65.

Linberg

K. R.

(1999). Software developer perceptions about software project failure: A case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(2–3), 177–192.

66.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.

67.

Mathieu

J. E.

Gilson

L. L.

(2012). Criteria issues and team effectiveness. In Kozlowski

S. W. J.

(Ed.), Oxford handbook of organizational psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 910–930). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

68.

Mathieu

J. E.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Donsbach

J. S.

Alliger

G. M.

(2014). A review and integration of team composition models: Moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160.

69.

Maynard

M. T.

Mathieu

J. E.

Gilson

L. L.

O’Boyle

E. H.

Cigularov

K. P.

(2013). Drivers and outcomes of team psychological empowerment: A meta-analytic review and model test. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 101–137.

70.

Mechtel

Bäker

Brändle

Vetter

(2011). Red cards: Not such bad news for penalized guest teams. Journal of Sports Economics, 12(6), 621–646.

71.

Moreland

R. L.

Levine

J. M.

Wingert

M. L.

(1996). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. In Witte

E. H.

Davis

J. H.

(Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 11–35). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

72.

Mueller

J. S.

(2012). Why individuals in larger teams perform worse. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117(1), 111–124.

73.

Nemeth

Rogers

(1996). Dissent and the search for information. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 67–76.

74.

K. Y.

van Dyne

(2005). Antecedents and performance consequences of helping behavior in work groups – A multilevel analysis. Group & Organization Management, 30(5), 514–540.

75.

Nijstad

B. A.

Stroebe

(2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 186–213.

76.

O’Reilly

C. A.

Caldwell

D. F.

Barnett

W. P.

(1989). Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(1), 21–37.

77.

Paletz

S. B. F.

Schunn

C. D.

(2010). A social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 73–95.

78.

Paulus

P. B.

(2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237–262.

79.

Pearce

J. A.

Ravlin

E. C.

(1987). The design and activation of self-regulating work groups. Human Relations, 40(11), 751–782.

80.

Pearsall

M. J.

Ellis

A. P. J.

Evans

J. M.

(2008). Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 225–234.

81.

Peltokorpi

Hasu

(2014). How participative safety matters more in team innovation as team size increases. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 37–45.

82.

Perkins

D. V.

(1982). Individual differences and task structure in the performance of a behavior setting: An experimental evaluation of Barker’s manning theory. American Journal of Community Psychology, 10(6), 617–634.

83.

Perrewé

P. L.

Zellars

K. L.

Ferris

G. R.

Rossi

A. M.

Kacmar

C. J.

Ralston

D. A.

(2004). Neutralizing job stressors: Political skill as an antidote to the dysfunctional consequences of role conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 141–152.

84.

Ralston

Lee

Perrewé

van Deusen

Vollmer

Maignan

… Rossi

(2010). A multi-society examination of the impact of psychological resources on stressor–strain relationships. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(4), 652–670.

85.

Ramanujam

Goodman

P. S.

(2003). Latent errors and adverse organizational consequences: A conceptualization. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(7), 815–836.

86.

Reiter-Palmon

Illies

J. J.

(2004). Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 55–77.

87.

Rodríguez-Escudero

A. I.

Carbonell

Munuera-Aleman

J. L.

(2010). Positive and negative effects of team stressors on job satisfaction and new product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 856–868.

88.

Rousseau

Aube

(2010). Team self-managing behaviors and team effectiveness: The moderating effect of task routineness. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 751–781.

89.

Schippers

M. C.

Edmondson

A. C.

West

M. A.

(2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45(6), 731–769.

90.

Schippers

M. C.

Homan

A. C.

Knippenberg

(2013). To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 6–23.

91.

Schoggen

(1989). Behavior settings: A revision and extension of Roger G. Barker’s “ecological psychology.” Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

92.

Scopelliti

Cillo

Busacca

Mazursky

(2014). How do financial constraints affect creativity? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 880–893.

93.

Scott

M. M.

(2005). A powerful theory and a paradox. Environment & Behavior, 37(3), 295–329.

94.

Sebok

(2000). Team performance in process control: Influences of interface design and staffing levels. Ergonomics, 43(8), 1210–1236.

95.

Sethi

(2009). Can quality-oriented firms develop innovative new products? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(2), 206–221.

96.

Sicotte

Bourgault

(2008). Dimensions of uncertainty and their moderating effect on new product development project performance. R&D Management, 38(5), 468–479.

97.

Sivasubramaniam

Liebowitz

S. J.

Lackman

C. L.

(2012). Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 803–820.

98.

Snijders

T. A. B.

Bosker

R. J.

(2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.

99.

Somech

Drach-Zahavy

(2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684–708.

100.

Staats

B. R.

Milkman

K. L.

Fox

C. R.

(2012). The team scaling fallacy: Underestimating the declining efficiency of larger teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118(2), 132–142.

101.

Steiner

I. D.

(1966). Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science, 11(4), 273–283.

102.

Steiner

I. D.

(1972). Group process and productivity. New York, NY: Academic Press.

103.

Sternberg

R. J.

Lubart

T. I.

(1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg

R. J.

(Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

104.

Stewart

G. L.

(2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55.

105.

Stockstrom

Herstatt

(2008). Planning and uncertainty in new product development. R&D Management, 38(5), 480–490.

106.

Stokols

(1995). The paradox of environmental psychology. American Psychologist, 50(10), 821–837.

107.

Summers

J. K.

Humphrey

S. E.

Ferris

G. R.

(2012). Team member change, flux in coordination, and performance: Effects of strategic core roles, information transfer, and cognitive ability. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 314–338.

108.

Unsworth

K. L.

Wall

T. D.

Carter

(2005). Creative requirement – A neglected construct in the study of employee creativity? Group & Organization Management, 30(5), 541–560.

109.

Van de Ven

A. H.

(1986). Central problems in the management of innovation. Management Science, 32(5), 590–607.

110.

Van den Beukel

A. L.

Molleman

(2002). Too little, too much: Downsides of multifunctionality in team-based work. Personnel Review, 31(4), 482–494.

111.

Van Knippenberg

De Dreu

C. K. W.

Homan

A. C.

(2004). Work group diversity and group performance: An integrative model and research agenda. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022.

112.

Van Knippenberg

Schippers

M. C.

(2007). Work group diversity. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 515–541.

113.

Vecchio

R. P.

Sussmann

(1981). Staffing sufficiency and job enrichment: Support for an optimal level theory. Journal of Occupational Behavior, 2(3), 177–187.

114.

Ward

T. B.

(1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27(1), 1–40.

115.

Weiss

Hoegl

Gibbert

(2014). Perceptions of material resources in innovation projects: What shapes them and how do they matter? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 278–291.

116.

West

M. A.

(1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In West

M. A.

(Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 555–579). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

117.

Wicker

A. W.

(1973). Undermanning theory and research: Implications for the study of psychological and behavioral effects of excess human populations. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 4, 185–206.

118.

Wicker

A. W.

(1979a). Ecological psychology: Some recent and prospective developments. American Psychologist, 34(9), 755–765.

119.

Wicker

A. W.

(1979b). Introduction to ecological psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

120.

Wicker

A. W.

(1987). Behavior settings reconsidered: Temporal stages, resources, internal dynamics, context. Handbook of Environmental Psychology, 1, 613–653.

121.

Wicker

A. W.

Kirmeyer

S. L.

Hanson

Alexander

(1976). Effects of manning levels on subjective experience, performance, and verbal interaction in groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 17(2), 251–274.

122.

Wuchty

Jones

B. F.

Uzzi

(2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036–1039.